>>4 nitpick about cargo cult ``best practices'' regarding tables, style attributes, and doctypes
no mention of invalid code such as unclosed p tags and h1 under table
Typical ``web developer'' detected.
>>22 Every HTML document must have a TITLE element in the HEAD section.
Name:
Anonymous2013-05-22 0:30
>>22,25
this kind of shockingly sexist humour, along with the irony in having a low self-esteem neckbeard proclaim a highly macho attitude, is the reason I fucking love /prog/.
>>30
When every last kike is dead and my job is done, then maybe I'll consider it.
Name:
Anonymous2013-05-22 3:17
>>31
if your mission is to kill all kikes then why don't you lead by example and start by killing yourself?
Name:
Anonymous2013-05-22 5:20
if your mission is to check all dubs then why don't you lead by example and start by checking yourself?
Name:
Anonymous2013-05-22 10:48
>>32
If kikes are supposed to be so smart then why are you so blissfully retarded?
Name:
Anonymous2013-05-22 10:49
>>34
If kikes are supposed to be so smart then why are *you* so blissfully retarded?
Name:
Anonymous2013-05-22 10:56
HTML is just as much programming as any other language. Yes, I know it's not Turing complete, neither is C! (for those too stupid to know why this is, it only has finite memory) Look kid, I know learning to program a "real" programming language (if you can call Python that) is probably the toughest intellectual challenge you've ever accomplished in your life (that *is* an insult, by the way) but the fact you think your fizzbuzz script and babbies command line first text adventure puts you above the majority of the population isn't just pathetic it's hilarious. You're nothing to me, I've mastered programing languages entirely based in paradigms you couldn't even imagine. I've developed prototypes of programming languages that fuse new ideas that have never even been considered by another person. I've exploited first class continuations to produce code so elegant you'd never be able to love another human if your puny brain was only capable of understanding it. Do you really fucking think you're in a different class than a little girl taking a web design class? I'll tell it to you straight: sorry kid, you're not. Sure, go back to posting about MUH TOURING MACHINES and patting yourself on the back when you've never used anything close to the full strength the Church-Turing thesis. Maybe you still have a chance of losing that ego and ascending, if you'd just read SICP and try to see that code and data are one maybe you'd start to realize that there's a continuum between programming a page layout machine with "markup" and programming a register machine with instructions - Turing completeness is a completely arbitrary distinction to make. Are you really that desperate to grasp oneto some kind of intelligence-by-association from grouping yourself in with the big dogs? Because all it does is make you look like an idiot who doesn't understand the most fundamental aspect of all programming.