>>36
New information. You never claimed that autism is a disability.
My asserting the idea that autism is a disability, I am basically admitting that I am inferior to the writer of
>>36.
Simplest theory consistent with terms:
1. You believe one who has a disability is inferior to one who does not have a disability.
2. You believe you are not disabled.
3. You believe I am disabled, due to 4, and 5 both being true.
4. You believe I am autistic.
5. You believe what I have written in
>>34 asserts that autism is a disability.
Points 2,3,4,5 are not interesting enough to warrant discussion.
Point 1 proves objectionably that you are a fuck face, and will be fucked in the face by 6 face fuckers at 6 in the fucking morning. Good day.