>>32
>>29 did not assert that you were a free spirit.
>>29 made wording that alluded to your bashing of people with a disability, while exploring the possibility of your intention being to assert the status of a free spirit. One who engages in such deplorable behavior with the intention of asserting they are a free spirit is not necessarily a free spirit, and by the nature of their form of expression, I would say they are not a free spirit. As they are enslaved to the act of proclaiming a false identity through acts that are destructive, both to themselves and to others. I do hope that one day you outgrow this childish behavior, so that one day you can truly check em.