Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Erik Naggum and c.l.l on Scheme

Name: Anonymous 2013-04-07 7:11

https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!msg/comp.lang.lisp/Ege9MyXRvH4/tBvxfFNbqrgJ

Its time to reinvigorate scheme.

No, it is not.  It is time to leave Scheme behind.  It used to be a language that brought many new ideas into _one_ language, but all of the good ideas have been picked up by other, better languages.  Common Lisp, Perl, Python, Ruby, and Java have all benefited from the little group of impractical purists who designed this minimalistic language experiment. Look, Tengwar is more widely used than Scheme these days.  The features unique to Scheme today are those that are universally considered bad ideas.  Worse: Perl, Python, Ruby, and Java have more of the Lisp nature than Scheme does, whether they admit to it or not, and better developed and more widely used to boot.  It is time to close the book on Scheme and let it wither and die, which it will if you leave the kind of people you have seen respond to you alone to destroy it from within.

If you still want a functional programming paradigm, there are lots and lots of more recent academic experiments that should be at least as useless as Scheme for real work, but which could be a little harder to teach, since they actually try to do _something_ and are not just trying to make a language optimized for reimplementation of itself by students.

If you are not welcome in the Scheme community, take a hint: Leave.  They do not even need to be provoked to attack individual people, as you have seen, so they are clearly bad people.  Do not try to change bad people: It makes the bad people worse and wastes your time (that is the lesson I learned from trying to deal with Scheme freaks as if they were people). Try instead to find good people who welcome the ability to think.

Ask yourself what you actually _like_ in Scheme.  Chances are you can get it, better implemented and better understood, in any number of other languages.  The only thing you probably cannot get in other languages is a full implementation of the language itself done as a student project. If you want that, just create your own language like everybody else who has ever actually tried to used Scheme does, anyway.

Name: Anonymous 2013-04-07 7:15

Incidentally, are you still raping preschool children?  Scheme is the favorite language of pedophiles, who love the pure and small, you know.

Name: Anonymous 2013-04-07 7:17

it is often said that small is beautiful.  now, anything can be beautiful
when it is small.  the ugliest person you can think of was probably a quite
pretty baby.  it doesn't take much effort to find a beautiful 16-year-old
girl, either.  in fact, our modern notions of beauty and elegance are
_defined_ in terms of size and maturity, so the chance of anything small
and immature being beautiful is vastly higher than anything big or mature.
now, despite all the marketing that seems to be aimed at telling me that I
should dump a girlfriend when she becomes 25 and get a new 16-year-old (or
even younger), I plan to stay with mine partly because of her ability to
grow older in a way I like.  consequently, I take exceptions to the
pedophilic attitudes to beauty and elegance that our societies have adopted
over the years.  this is why I don't like the "small is beautiful" model of
aesthetics.  this is why I think that almost anybody could make something
small and beautiful, but only a few can create something that grows from
small to huge and still remains beautiful.  but then again, look at
interior architecture -- with huge spaces come a need for size-reducing
ornamentation.  the scaling process _itself_ adds "junk" to what was "clean
surfaces" in a small model.  Schemers refer to Common Lisp's "warts", and
prefer to think of Scheme as "clean".  now, I wonder, would Schemers prefer
to live in small houses with nothing on their walls?  would they still
prefer this if the walls were a 100 feet high and 200 feet long, or would
they, too, desire some ornamentation that would have looked _very_ bad if
it had been on a 10 by 20 feet wall?

Name: Anonymous 2013-04-07 7:24

>>1

You are right, I like PHP. It is more lisp in nature, but actually better, because it is dynamic typed. It has a lot of features of lisp, like variables variables. And it is the fastest for web.

Name: Anonymous 2013-04-07 7:56



???????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????? ???????? ????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????? ???????????????? ???????? ????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????????????????????? ????????????????????????????????, ???????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????? ???????????????????? ???????? ???????????? ????????????????????????????????, ???? ????????????????????????????
???????????????????????????????????????????? ???????? ????????????????????????????, ????????????????????, ????????????????-???????????????????????????? ???????????????????????? ???????????????? ???????????????? ????????????????????????
???????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????? ???????? ???????????????????????????? ???????????? ????????????????????????
???????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????? ???????????? ???????????? ????????????.

???????? ???????? ???? ???????????????? ???????? ???????????????????????? ????????????, ???????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????????????? ???????????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????? ????????????
???????? ???????????????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????? ???????? ???????????? ????????????????????????????????.

Name: Anonymous 2013-04-07 13:00

>>1
Why Google Groups (especially new interface, which is uglier btw) are so agonizingly slow, lock browser and leak memory? Why they constantly produce "An error occurred while communicating with the server"?

Why clicking "Learn about the new features you’ll find" lands me on "Page not available We're sorry, but the information you've requested cannot be found. Please try searching or browsing the Help Center."?

Is it that hard to use simpler, Shiichan-like, engine or email list?

Name: Anonymous 2013-04-07 13:04

>>6
And picking "Revert to the old Google Groups" just hangs with "Updating settings..." forever.

Name: Anonymous 2013-04-07 14:02

>>6
>>7
google
I found your problem.

Name: Anonymous 2013-04-07 18:54

>>8
muh muh privacy

Name: Anonymous 2013-04-07 19:15

>>9
fuck you freedom-hating cretinoid retard

Name: Anonymous 2013-04-07 19:20

>>9 fuck off and go load a google groups page and get your browser stuck in an infinite javascript loop and overheat your e/g/in modified computer and start a fire in your room but you can't escape past your supply of energy drinks, and then proceed to burn alive along with the rest of your non-privacy respecting consumer electronics, ``please''.

Name: Anonymous 2013-04-07 19:26

>>1
Whatever bitch. Come back when you've implemented an optimizing compiler with full support for continuations.

Name: Anonymous 2013-04-07 19:26

>>10
fuck you check your cocksucking privilege ableist cretinarian bigot

Name: Anonymous 2013-04-07 19:29

>>11
>your e/g/in modified computer
>your e/g/in modified computer
>your e/g/in modified computer
LLLLLLLLEEEEEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL

Name: Anonymous 2013-04-07 19:35

>>10-11
muh muh freedom muh muh stallman

Name: Anonymous 2013-04-07 19:37

>>15
muh muh "muh muh"

Name: Anonymous 2013-04-07 20:46

>>13
fuck you crippleshit

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List