Enrich

- Fork LTC and rewrite it in LISP or C
- Add things like "improved stability", "more secure", etc.
- Give it a funny name
- We from /prog/ invest on it firstly
- With all our knowledge on JEWS, we mimic all their abilities to make someone spread
- It gets famous
- It gets more valuable
- We cash out (easily and at once, by a way created earlier)

I might set up a Github if more people is interested in helping.

>>13
No offense, but you are fucking retarded.

>>10
Shalom aleichem, fellow JEW!

>>14
No offense, but you're a faggot nigger. (Not >>14-retard, by the way.)

>>14

Could you explain why, so I can be less fucking retarded, ``please''?

>>16
Not >>14, but I'll give you a reason (but I didn't really think you were being serious). It's fucking retarded because that has nothing to do with making a currency. Why in Heaven's Holy name would you reward coins based on the CPU architecture used? Why not reward coins differently based on the amount of porn on the hard drive (less coins when there is more porn, because only dorks still keep porn saved after fapping) or the number of posts you've made on /prog/?.

>>17
less coins when there is more porn, because only dorks still keep porn saved after fapping
Cloud computing faggot detected.

>>17

Bitcoin and its forks base the reward in computer power, which also "has nothing to do with making a currency" by your point of view, as far as I can tell.

However, such a method tend always to an oligopoly of those with money for more computationally powerful machines and could even be broken by quantum algorithms, such as Shor's and Grover's.

Having the reward based on architecture uniqueness, would provide a more open and secure cryptocurrency, as well as more speculation on the market on what people are using.
At a philosophical side, it could expand the horizon of computing, by introducing new ideas to people, who should have broken out of Von Neumann's architecture for quite some time.

>>19
It rewards on computing power equally. It doesn't increase the payout just because you managed to get it running on a Super Nintendo

>>20

Rewarding based on architecture uniqueness could still be computed trough a function and done equally.

Anyway, this is causing too much discussion. I'd say just to go with one of the post-quantum algorithms. Its implementation's reasons are clearer to understand, I guess.

Anyway, we need more ideas to take this even further.

Does RMS hold a trademark on "GNU"? If not, we should call it GNUcoin so that people will think that it `freer' than bitcoin and we'll get more coverage on Reddit, Slashdot, and ^_le Hacker News.

>>22
The name will never take hold until a celebrity (such as RMS) endorses it.

>>22

GNU is bloated and inelegant, the only good aspect of it is the licensing philosophy; the programs themselves are disgusting.

Anyway, naming it should be discussed much later, when we already have all of its main concepts listed and set up a repository.

So far, it is:

- Forked from Litecoin
- Written LISP or C
- More memory-hard in order to prevent GPUs' overtake
- Post-quantum cryptography (Multivariate or Lattice-based) for long term use

>>23
Good, because we've got plenty of celebrities to draw on! Nikita is quickly gaining celebrity status by being banned everywhere except here. Mentishit has been the laughing stock of the internet for two fucking decades. Then there is Leah, who I hear likes her fan base here. We've also received an email from the Sussman, and we can probably use selective quoting to make it seem like an endorsement. We've got that `anonymous chat' thread we might be able to blackmail the Omegle guy with.

>>25
kkkkkkkkkk

>Leah, who I hear likes her fan base here.
Fanbase of one person and two people who admit that Adria Richards makes her seem like a goddess in comparison.

Why Litecoin? Why not just fork Bitcoin?

>>21
Architecture uniqueness is still a retarded idea. How are you going to prove this to your peers without it being super easy to forge?

>>29>>14

>>28

Litecoin is an improved Bitcoin, ASIC-proof and with more equality between CPU and GPU (even though not enough).

Easier to fork Litecoin than to fork Bitcoin and reimplement many things Litecoin presented.

>>28
ASIC-proof
They used to say it was GPU-proof.
Go fork github.com/g000001/Uranus.

kids can't into memory-hard functions these days.

>>13
This is good. It'll be able to break the proprietary Intel/AMD monopoly.

>>34
Now all you need to do is figure out an algorithm that'll achieve that. It's not like it's NP-hard or anything.

>>35
Hackers will change the User-Agent of their CPU.

Let's make the GUI have round corners. And it should integrate with our exchange, so you can trade into and out of Bitcoin right in the GUI without having to make a stupid account and getting ``verified''.