Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Unix will become the next MS-DOS

Name: Anonymous 2013-04-04 15:42

Name: Anonymous 2013-04-04 18:07

Unix will become the next MS-DOS
What do you imply here?

Name: Anonymous 2013-04-04 18:16

>implying I implied anything

Name: Anonymous 2013-04-04 19:16

>>2
It'll soon be obsolete.

Name: Anonymous 2013-04-04 19:21

WHY IS THIS SHTTY SITE NOT LOADING FULLY IM FUCKING MAD THE PAGE IS BROKEN AFTER THE FIRST 3 POSTS I CANT SEE IT ALL SAEFASDF FSDAFSDAFGSDA FFHBS DHFGJSGFGFDG SDDFGFD GF DFS

Name: Anonymous 2013-04-05 2:42

>>2
if it aint lisp, it is crap.

Name: Anonymous 2013-04-05 5:19

>>6
lisp isn't an OS unto itself though.
Much like Linux, which should actually be known as GNU/Linux.
where did I go wrong in life, to be posting /g/ catchphrases on /prog/ just to annoy

Name: Anonymous 2013-04-05 6:55

>>7
Yeah. And C/C++ isn't Unix.

Name: Anonymous 2013-04-05 7:35

My LISP machine runs GNU/Genera.

Name: Anonymous 2013-04-05 22:31

>>11
thanks bro

Name: Anonymous 2013-04-05 22:31

>>10
nice dubs

Name: Anonymous 2013-04-05 23:59

>>7,8
C is to Unix as Lisp is to Lisp Machines. Unix defines the original C `style' and programming environment. The core of Windows is the ultimate example of how to implement a system in C without actually following any of its core conventions (handwritten function tables vs. COM, shared objects vs. DLLs, etc).

Also, keep in mind that operating systems written in a low level language (like CP/M) were still in vogue when >>1 was recorded. The idea of having a microcomputer operating system written (almost) entirely in a high level language was a really untested concept at the time.

Name: >>12 2013-04-06 0:09

like CP/M
I mena CP/M-86.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List