Dear JEWS:

Die.

No, seriously. This is a rant, and it’s about you, personally. You, personally, are a shit, because statistics indicate there is an almost 100% certainty that you have either committed fraud, or wanted to commit money laundering, or knowingly assisted or defended someone who committed people to loans with unfair interest rates, or mocked a person who couldn’t pay their loan back. And no, I’m not dropping links to tell you what you should damn well already know.

Here is what you know: that you are a vile and depraved chunk of flesh that doesn’t matter to the world. You exist in a reality you perpetuate in which value is all relative to gold, in which everything is placed into a bank via deposit, which in the end means that nothing has inherent value unless it is compared to gold. You are literally worthless.

And you are willing to do it as long as someone in need of money and credit. So part of the way you deal with that is to try to make people want things they don’t need and convince them to take out loans. You whine and complain and cry about the Shoah or the six trillion or anti-Semitism or big bad Nazis or interest-free banking, but in the end you lap it up and grin so that you can have someone underneath your own thumb. You only care about the amount of gold to your name, so spare me the crocodile tears.
I used to pity you. I used to feel sorry for you. I used to think most of you got a bad rap and were probably misunderstood.

>>42
Your words are boring. It's not commutative as soon as you weigh the historical, and current, impact and scale of various forms of discrimination. Dictionaries are years behind the state of the art of anything, and worse. Consult your run-of-the-mill dictionary on the meaning of ``Anarchy'' (Merriam-Webster online seems to acknowledge what's meant by it since the 19th century, though). That should provide some food for thought.

You know what? Fuck this, this is endless. See you next time, Krueger.

PS: how'd the beans go?

>>50
Your words are boring.
Yours are fucking enraging you retarded piece of shit.

It's not commutative as soon as you weigh the historical, and current, impact and scale of various forms of discrimination.
STATISTICS AND HISTORY CANNOT BE USED TO JUSTIFY DISCRIMINATION. FUCK, HOW FUCKING THICK ARE YOU?

Dictionaries are years behind the state of the art of anything, and worse.
In this case, the widely-used definition is still the dictionary one. Almost everyone still defines xxxxism as discrimination by xxxx, which is a subset of bigotry. Discrimination is commutative. What you are talking about, systemic/historical/societal/large-scale/statistical/etc xxxxism, is indeed not fucking commutative since we are doing a differential analysis of the situations of two or more large groups. However, one person cannot possibly commit systemic/historical/societal/large-scale/statistical/etc xxxxism against another. Redefining xxxxism while still almost everyone uses the commutative bigotry definition is a total dick move, and you fucking know it. Also, you cannot say that whites/males/heterosexuals/cis/etc. are committing systemic/historical/societal/large-scale/statistical/etc xxxxism against blacks/females/homosexuals/trans/etc. since that implies that every white/male/heterosexual/cis/etc. is guilty of xxxxism, which is obviously untrue (well, at least to everyone who does not have a tumblr account), and actually counts as discrimination. The proper phrasing is that a subset of group A is committing xxxxism against a subset of group B, which shows up in the statistical data as systemic/historical/societal/large-scale/statistical/etc xxxxism.

PS: how'd the beans go?
Pretty delicious actually. Painful afterwards.