Dear JEWS:

Die.

No, seriously. This is a rant, and it’s about you, personally. You, personally, are a shit, because statistics indicate there is an almost 100% certainty that you have either committed fraud, or wanted to commit money laundering, or knowingly assisted or defended someone who committed people to loans with unfair interest rates, or mocked a person who couldn’t pay their loan back. And no, I’m not dropping links to tell you what you should damn well already know.

Here is what you know: that you are a vile and depraved chunk of flesh that doesn’t matter to the world. You exist in a reality you perpetuate in which value is all relative to gold, in which everything is placed into a bank via deposit, which in the end means that nothing has inherent value unless it is compared to gold. You are literally worthless.

And you are willing to do it as long as someone in need of money and credit. So part of the way you deal with that is to try to make people want things they don’t need and convince them to take out loans. You whine and complain and cry about the Shoah or the six trillion or anti-Semitism or big bad Nazis or interest-free banking, but in the end you lap it up and grin so that you can have someone underneath your own thumb. You only care about the amount of gold to your name, so spare me the crocodile tears.
I used to pity you. I used to feel sorry for you. I used to think most of you got a bad rap and were probably misunderstood.

>>40
Your privilege is mildly annoying, from another privileged fuck who would have ended up falling into crime should I have been browner and actually poor, given my circumstances.
Your ad hominem is very annoying. Who I am (and you have no fucking clue about who I am by the nature of this medium) is irrelevant. If you're going to complain about my ignoring of certain aspects of a problem due to what you think is a unchecked privilege problem, please do so explicitly.

Frist off, ``discrimination'' by xxxx isn't called xxxxism,
Yes it fucking is. A female can be sexist towards a male, and a black person can be racist towards a white person. If you're prescriptivist, read a dictionary. If you're descriptivist, go outside (you know, the big blue box?) and ask someone on the street.

are not a societal problem.
Woman-only events and workplace HR terrorism, however, are. Some forms of affirmative action may also be.

You won't do jack shit for equality without some ``discrimination''
Hey folks, let's fight blatant injustice with blatant injustice, I'm sure this will cast credibility and integrity on our movement.

highlighting the ills of discriminatory society will necessarily entail putting emphasis on the various, often subtle, forms of discrimination which groups which have actually been negatively suffer, even if not done so with ill will, as the ``blindness'' of those participant of the system applies to the ways they set others aside.
I'm not sure what you mean by this, possibly because English is my fourth language. I'll expand this into several possible meanings and reply to each of them. It is possible that your intent was a linear combination thereof.

[People discriminate sometimes without even being aware of it, and education/training is necessary to bring such `feelings' to the surface, to recognize them, and finally eliminate them.]
I completely agree. I don't see any reason why this would be inherently discriminatory or logically inconsistent. xxxx-blindness is a distant goal, an ideal towards which one must work. Depending on how the human brain functions (like a piece of shit, as history has shown), it may even be unattainable. Being xxxx-blind when studying institutionalized/large-scale/historical xxxxism does not mean shrugging and saying "bah doesn't exist since my magical xxxx-blindness glasses block it", it just means that the various facts should be treated unemotionally and "commutatively", ie with no particular bias towards one group over the other.

[All people in a privileged group can be assumed to discriminate against the oppressed group by statistical/historical/psychological argument, therefore social policy should discriminate against the privileged group to ``even out the odds''.]
There could be no better example of rationalized vengeance-powered injustice and bigotry. The thought that someone would actually consider doing this in the name of equality sickens me. If you truly believe this, please do us all a service and apoptose yourself.

You are nothing but a whiner.
And you are nothing but a hateful, retarded fuckwad.