/prog/ - HTML5 is a passing fad

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-17 15:42

Just like Javashit.

In the end, only ASM, C, and LISP will remain.

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-17 15:54

The entire Internet is a passing fag- I mena fad.

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-17 16:05

In all seriousness, I'm predicting that the future of the web is going to be heavily reliant on SVG-generating programs and a new generation of WYSIWYG web editors, along the lines of Adobe Flash. It's quite possible that people will stop writing HTML directly—check out the Scheme dialect used in http://www.chris-granger.com/2012/04/12/light-table---a-new-ide-concept/

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-17 16:07

>people will stop writing HTML directly

how is it there in 90s

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-17 16:11

>>4
You tell me, LISPer!

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-17 16:14

But seriously, HTML5 is a pain in the ass to fully take advantage of. If/when Adobe ditches Flash, we're going to see a lot of new design tools intended to replace it with SVG animations.

And last time I checked, people were still searching for a good unifying language so they could avoid writing HTML and JS directly. There are a lot of these, and they're all recent efforts.

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-17 16:27

raphael.js

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-17 17:16

>>6
So don't make web pages with "rich content", just use simple CSS and HTML.

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-17 17:35

>>8
Like this?
http://hotaru.thinkindifferent.net/calc.html

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-17 18:28

>>8
People will always want to cram more crap into the browser. More games these days than animation, but it's pretty much certain that there will always be change and upward-building.

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-17 19:06

In the end, only ASM, C, and Symta will remain.

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-17 19:40

aaaaaaaa

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-17 19:42

>>3
Scheme dialect used in [Light Table]
Scheme dialect
SCHEME

I would like to inform you that the language therein showcased was, in fact, Clojure, which is not a Scheme dialect in any way or form.

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-17 19:47

>>13
Oh, snap, sorry. It's been a while since I watched those.

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-17 19:49

>>13
Clojure: (+ 1 1)
Scheme: (+ 1 1)

Looks like the same language to me.

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-17 19:50

>>14
That's no excuse for being an idiot.

Name: 13 2013-03-17 19:53

>>15
3/10

>>14
Now, that's just rude.

Name: >>17 2013-03-17 19:58

Sorry, meant >>16, not >>14

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-17 21:12

>>18
You're trying too hard, ignoramus.

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-17 21:23

>>19
Explain yourself, scoundrel!

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-18 2:34

>loljure, which is not a Scheme dialect in any way or form.
eye eich en bee tea

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-18 17:17

how long until HTML 6 with integrated LISP support?

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-18 17:18

how long until LISP 6 with integrated HTML support?

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-18 17:19

how long until le processors in le javascript? leeeel /e/gin post /g/avascript is truly e/g/in ;)

HTML5 is a passing fad

1 Name: Anonymous 2013-03-17 15:42

2 Name: Anonymous 2013-03-17 15:54

3 Name: Anonymous 2013-03-17 16:05

4 Name: Anonymous 2013-03-17 16:07

5 Name: Anonymous 2013-03-17 16:11

6 Name: Anonymous 2013-03-17 16:14

7 Name: Anonymous 2013-03-17 16:27

8 Name: Anonymous 2013-03-17 17:16

9 Name: Anonymous 2013-03-17 17:35

10 Name: Anonymous 2013-03-17 18:28

11 Name: Anonymous 2013-03-17 19:06

12 Name: Anonymous 2013-03-17 19:40

13 Name: Anonymous 2013-03-17 19:42

14 Name: Anonymous 2013-03-17 19:47

15 Name: Anonymous 2013-03-17 19:49

16 Name: Anonymous 2013-03-17 19:50

17 Name: 13 2013-03-17 19:53

18 Name: >>17 2013-03-17 19:58

19 Name: Anonymous 2013-03-17 21:12

20 Name: Anonymous 2013-03-17 21:23

21 Name: Anonymous 2013-03-18 2:34

22 Name: Anonymous 2013-03-18 17:17

23 Name: Anonymous 2013-03-18 17:18

24 Name: Anonymous 2013-03-18 17:19