/prog/ - What's the best LISP

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-11 13:52

Argument or die

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-11 13:57

Ruby
/thread

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-11 14:04

Python: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1803815

Name: dat dam cosservativ 2013-03-11 14:06

obama
toolz n foolz
u dam liberalz
big fat money grubbin SCHEME

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-11 14:08

>>3
I've written the same basic algorithms in Javascript, Python, and Common Lisp to play around with them. I find the Python the best vehicle for conveying the algorithms despite being more fluent in Common Lisp.

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-11 14:23

Unfortunately, we do not have an active Semiconductor Trolling Services campaign at the moment. If you are the Semiconductor Trolling Services owner or a customer and want to add a bonus, please add it here.

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-12 2:25

>>2
>>3
ruby
python

not based on sexps
poor metaprogramming
poor performance

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-12 2:41

Turbo Pascal

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-12 3:27

>>8
turbo jews

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-12 3:46

>>8
U MENA PASKAL

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-12 4:05

Common Lisp for practicality

Name: Anonymouse 2013-03-12 4:25

hip flip mlip

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-12 4:51

>>8
Philippe Kahn (inventor of Delphi and Turbo Pascal) - JEW

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-12 5:04

Steelbank Common Lisp.
I've never actually programmed anything in Lisp and am just parroting the words of others.

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-12 5:13

C++

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-12 5:17

>>14
I'd try it out for experience if I were you. It's really just like any other language, but (in my opinion) it's easy to program with.

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-12 9:43

SBCL, or the one that you wrote yourself

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-12 10:02

Racket for its market dominance.

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-12 10:19

LISP?

In 2013?

Hah.

You know what the problem with LISP is?

No?

Well, guess what. I do.

It's called GC.

GC is shit.

Therefore LISP is shit

tldr: FCOG

/thread

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-12 10:23

>>19
Excellent reasoned, logical, sound arguments. I have no choice but to believe you.

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-12 11:38

Clojure because java interoperability.

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-12 11:44

>>21-sama here

I would like to also interject and let you know that >>18-kun has a well reasoned argument - remember its the only language that ships with both batteries!

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-12 11:50

>>3
Python has no tail recursion. Enjoy your Maximum recursion depth exceeded

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-12 11:52

>>22
You shouldn't refer to yourself as ``sama''. That's rude, oniichan.

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-12 12:21

check 'em

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-12 12:37

Symta

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-12 13:18

Someone beat me to the Culver.

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-12 21:19

up

What's the best LISP

1 Name: Anonymous 2013-03-11 13:52

2 Name: Anonymous 2013-03-11 13:57

3 Name: Anonymous 2013-03-11 14:04

4 Name: dat dam cosservativ 2013-03-11 14:06

5 Name: Anonymous 2013-03-11 14:08

6 Name: Anonymous 2013-03-11 14:23

7 Name: Anonymous 2013-03-12 2:25

8 Name: Anonymous 2013-03-12 2:41

9 Name: Anonymous 2013-03-12 3:27

10 Name: Anonymous 2013-03-12 3:46

11 Name: Anonymous 2013-03-12 4:05

12 Name: Anonymouse 2013-03-12 4:25

13 Name: Anonymous 2013-03-12 4:51

14 Name: Anonymous 2013-03-12 5:04

15 Name: Anonymous 2013-03-12 5:13

16 Name: Anonymous 2013-03-12 5:17

17 Name: Anonymous 2013-03-12 9:43

18 Name: Anonymous 2013-03-12 10:02

19 Name: Anonymous 2013-03-12 10:19

20 Name: Anonymous 2013-03-12 10:23

21 Name: Anonymous 2013-03-12 11:38

22 Name: Anonymous 2013-03-12 11:44

23 Name: Anonymous 2013-03-12 11:50

24 Name: Anonymous 2013-03-12 11:52

25 Name: Anonymous 2013-03-12 12:21

26 Name: Anonymous 2013-03-12 12:37

27 Name: Anonymous 2013-03-12 13:18

28 Name: Anonymous 2013-03-12 21:19