The more hardware gets faster (not better)

The worse software will get.


the only thing we can do is sabotage

>>38
I will not be part of the Bin Laden family no matter how I wish
If you name yourself "Bin Laden", then you will be a part of Bin Laden family.


Given enough energy you can transform even shit into gold, while physical matter is just 0 and 1 bits, which can take any given form.

>>38
I haven't reached that goal but I am certainly on the way there.
Hahaha.. AHAHAHAHAHA. If you only knew what I know. All our labor and sweat is without reward. We're both inevitably doomed to a meaningless end.

JEWS are a social construct.

dubs are a social construct
also, check em

check 'em

>>45
intentionally failing dubz is le epik new meme now?

>>42
Whether you believe you can or believe you can't, you're probably right - Henry Ford

>>42
Le highschooler just got done reading le camus.

why is it that only edgy young adult males believe such things?

>>47
fuck henry ford
fuck edison
tesla okay but he is a fatty hater and most likely racist

fuckin 19th and 20th century people are cunts

I am glad we live in a Modern Liberal Age

>>49
Excellent reasons there chief, I totally agree with you, random internet person over people who accomplish things.

>>49
tesla okay but he is a fatty hater
What's wrong with that? Are you a fatty?

>>47
Hope is not a strategy. Luck is not a factor. Fear is not an option. - James Cameron

I genuinely believe I'm God. According to your reasoning, I am God. Bow down to me, foolish mortal.

>>22
Alright, what would that something be? I'm all ears.

>>53
I think he's referring to subjective experience, which is beyond computation.^[1]
Too bad it's all reciprocal though; the computer thinks you're the soulless machine. Or that's what it would think if it were aware of such concepts.

^[1] Try to localize yourself in an arbitrary cellular automaton. See what I mean?

Oh cool I have the same initials as James Cameron. - Jesus Christ

>>53
a highly complex group of self-sustaining chemical reactions..?

>>52
You're missing the point which is free will. Having a will doesn't necessarily mean that one can change one's biology or overall environment. What it does mean is that we can choose goals and find ways to achieve them. I cannot grow myself a third arm, I can study biology and robotics for the goal of building a third arm. I cannot stop a two tonne car by my strength, I can train to pull a bus to a given standard. I cannot stop earthquakes from occurring but I can invest research money into geographical studies and engineering technologies so that buildings can better survive them when they occur.

>>29

Yeah, well you don't need to believe in my demigod in order to be fucked in the ass by him for eternity, but don't worry, you'll enjoy it.

>>54
>I think he's referring to subjective experience, which is beyond computation.[1]
Give a reasonable definition of subjective experience so that there may be a logical connection to computation. Then we can ask if it is beyond or not.

Too bad it's all reciprocal though; the computer thinks you're the soulless machine. Or that's what it would think if it were aware of such concepts.
At present day technology, we can understand the schematics of our machines and be reasonably certain that they are not aware of concepts. But then consider a chaotic FPGA with a microphone input that has been reassembling itself over thousands of years. Even if you had access to its schematics, its design would not be humanly comprehensible, and you would not know its designed purpose. So you could not be sure that it doesn't have a process that is equivalent to us understanding concepts.

Try to localize yourself in an arbitrary cellular automaton. See what I mean?
Quines can do it. They can do it better than I can, actually.