Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Niggers considered harmful

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-05 17:43

Discuss

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-05 17:56

[quote]true[/quote]

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-05 17:59

This is now a BBCode thread.

I'm testing my sexp-code compiler, which I intend to release as some sort of userscript Real Soon Now™, and it hadn't occurred to me to test whether BBCode was ignored between code tags, though I'm sure it works like that:

[b]testan[/b]

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-05 18:01

>>3
Shit, I go through the effort of writing that crap and yet I can't manage to put the tags in the right order.

BBCode

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-05 19:48

>>3
Yes, yes.

But why did you have to write it in Javashit? As useful as it may be (for some illiterate fagstorms), I don't mind opening a terminal and executing a C program.

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-05 19:52

>>5
Of course not, I wouldn't dirty my hands with Javashit. It's actually written in Clojurescript. If I actually do come through with this, I'll release the actual Clojurescript source code, but what you would actually use in the browser is the unreadable compiled Javascript.

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-05 20:02

>>6
Oh, that's actually a good idea. Good to know. Please keep us informed.

How much of the Xarn standard is implemented, by the way? I find definitions and iterations rather pointless.

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-05 20:10

>>7
I've implemented iterations, it wasn't hard to do (syntactic sugar to be expanded while parsing) and could occasionally come handy with sup and sub. Definitions I think I'll pass. It seems really contrived and they aren't worth it to be adding state to this language.

Code would be different as well, as it's unary in /prog/, and I honestly don't know what the fuck to do about quote. I'll need help if we don't want to settle with a very limited implementation of that one.

I'll now implement verbatim in all its glory, and I think that I'll make it so code treats its body as verbatim does as well.

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-05 20:28

>>8
s/(quote /<blockquote>/g
Now find the matching ) and replace it with a <blockquote>.

I'm obviously not serious, but you know what I mean.

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-05 20:28

>>9
And I forgot to escape my (>s, but who cares.

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-05 20:33

>>9
<blockquote>How I wish it were that simple.</blockquote>

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-05 20:42

Well, found the way to quote code. It's awful, though.


>­ [­­­code](define (fact x)[/code][­­o][­code]
    (if (< x 2)
        1
        (* x (- x 1))))[­/code][­­/o]


(hopefully the soft-hyphens ``escaped'' the BBCode)

Should produce:

(define (fact x)
    (if (< x 2)
        1
        (* x (- x 1))))

That's gonna be leave a mess in my evaluator.

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-05 21:22

Any EXPERT BBCode PROGRAMMERS out there who may shed some light on how Shiitchan quotes ``work''?

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-05 21:26

I clearly can barely manage with Sexpcode.

INEXPERT BBCode PROGRAMMER

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-05 21:28

>>12
> [code](define (fact x)[/code][br][code]    (if (< x 2)[/code][br][code]        1[/code][br][code]        (* x (- x 1))))[/code]

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-05 21:32

>>15
Hmmmm... I hadn't considered [­br] because I never got it to nest. Anyway, at least it's more uniform, let's give it a try.

(define (fact x)
    (if (< x 2)
        1
        (* x (- x 1))))

Name: >>16 2013-03-05 21:33

>>15
Well, it's an option, thank you.

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-05 21:48

>>1-1000
Wait wait wait wait wait wait WAIT

DON'T FUCKING USE THE BROKEN > SHIT

Use the unary (quote "adsf fads afds fads fads fads dsafsadf")

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-05 21:51

>>18
And by this I mean "don't fucking dare to implement > in your userscript unless you're rewriting /prog/ from scratch". A very basic subset of Sexpcode is more than fine here. If you're going for the ``advanced stuff'', please rewrite a /prog/ that accepts Sexpcode natively instead.

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-05 22:01

>>18,19

I see what you mean, but to clarify, I wished to support forms like {quote {b.u.i.o THE PLEASURE OF BEING CUMMED INSIDE} {quote hax my anus}}, etcetera.

That doesn't seem very feasible, though. Fucking Shiitchan.

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-06 0:36


._._._._, .     .  .,,,.,,,.........
|| ._. |||`|: :|'|| ,__ ./|  ..,.,,/
|| | | ||| |: :| || | /./ |  \----~
|| | | ||| |: :| || |//   '\  \
|| |/ //'| |: :| || . \.   \\  \
|| / //' | |: :| || |\ |    \\  \
||  //'  | |: :| || | \ \    \\  \
|| //'   `| \_/ |'| |__\ \ ...!\  \
||//'      \   /  |_'___`')|_______')
`''         ```    `'`''`` ''`'"`'~"`

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-06 13:20

This thread isn't about niggers at all

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-06 14:10

>>20
http://wakaba.c3.cx/shii/

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-06 14:29

>>23
Yeah, I know the source is there, but I was rather unwilling to read the source of such a brittle program.

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-22 9:17

Nigger Jews confirmed for harmful.

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-22 12:03

>>12
Why not just use [br]? Also, you haven't forgotten about [rem], right?

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-22 16:47

>>21
Check my cacodubs
Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -