Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

linux

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-22 0:17

    what would be the equivalent of ollydbg for linux?

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-22 0:33

gdb, and lots of envy.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-22 0:46

>>2

fuck that's not the answer i wanted

fuck gdb

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-22 0:57

>>3
ollydbg and wine, then.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-22 2:03

I don't think there's any good disassembler for Linux.
Someone need to program one.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-22 2:05

objdump -d

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-22 2:05

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-22 2:58

>>5
Doesn't IDA run on Linux though?

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-22 3:07

>>1
http://hte.sourceforge.net/
Or use objdump -d like a normal person.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-22 3:10

>>4
>>9

>objdump (part of the GNU Binutils)
>(part of the GNU Binutils)
>GNU Binutils
>GNU

BLOATED AND SHTI

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-22 3:14

>>10
10-sama, GNU only wants what is best for you. Accept and love GNU with all your heart, and browse /prog/ with Emacs/W3. Only then will you have freedom.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-22 3:31

>>11

VIM VIM VIM VIM VIM VIM VIM VIM VIM VIM VIM VIM VIM

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-22 4:35

>>10
You are welcome to make your own

>>12
Stop using niggerware. Use ex-vi like a man.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-22 4:36

it looks like you cannot post with w3m here

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-22 4:44

>>14
Eh? I use lynx here. w3m should work, even ELinks

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-22 5:03

>>7
Why the fuck does this use a GUI?

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-22 5:10

>>16
gotta write fat bloated shit if ya wanna make it in da REAL WORLD

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-22 5:10

>>13
>nigger

RACIST

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-23 1:27

>>7
c++ (my favorite language, can't you tell?) b
he is a huge faggot.

Name: Cudder !MhMRSATORI!fR8duoqGZdD/iE5 2013-02-23 1:53

http://code.google.com/p/edb-debugger/
Don't like the fact that the current instruction indicator isn't a highlight bar, (nor the font rendering) but this is probably the closest you'll get.

>>3
Agreed.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-23 3:02

>>18
racist
FAGGOT

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-23 3:08

I wish there was an equivalent of ollydbg for linux. ;_;

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-23 4:58

>>22
People wonder why I don't care for proprietary software. The fact that I am forbidden to control it is why. Ollydbg is proprietary software, those who depend on it choose to live a helpless life.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-23 5:40

>>23
You're welcome to control it, however it may take control of your computer (and do whatever the fuck it wants) before you get a chance.  Say no to unauditable software.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-23 5:52

>>24
You can't control it because you don't have access to the source code. People say they can change the binary but they can only make trivial changes to it. They can't do substantial work for example, porting Ollydbg to a CPU architecture that isn't x86 and operating system that isn't Windows. People can't study the internals of the program in order to transplant that design into other software.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-23 7:32

>>25
Given enough time I suppose you could decompile it to a platform-independent language and port that to another architecture.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-23 7:45

>>26
Decompiled binary code is not source code, you cannot study how it works. Studying source code with any commentary is difficult as it is, studying the code of a binary program is impractical and is normally done as a last resort.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-23 8:05

>>27
I'm just saying it's possible, not that it's worth it. Using a time-money equivalence, you're probably better off paying an urban thug to break into the developer's home and steal the source code.

Name: Cudder !MhMRSATORI!fR8duoqGZdD/iE5 2013-02-23 8:40

>>27
Reading decompiler output is easier than one really long column of asm.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-23 15:33

linux is not good for programming. it's for wasting your life because you have nothing better to do.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-23 15:45

>>30
Oh yeah, obscure companies (that you've never heard of) such as Samsung, Sony and Google wasting thousands upon thousands of their money and time for the fun of it.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List