Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

javascript ``done right''

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-10 13:57

ok, since you faggots have nothing better to do than diss javascript even after i've totally destroyed your arguments, i'm giving you the opportunity to put your dad's money where your mouth is and try to convince me how it could be ``improved''

this is going to be entertaining to say the least

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-10 13:58

I thought you left months ago.
Anyway, I'll start: how about some TCO?

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-10 14:00

>>2
ES6. try again

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-10 14:05

>>3
Is that actually implemented anywhere yet?

What about some more cruft like generators and iterators? I'd sure like some more syntax that adds no expressibility.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-10 14:07

Oh yeah, and the prototype inheritance model. I'd rather not have it "walk up a chain" to find some method it should know it has immediately. That seems slow by design.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-10 14:10

>>4
the generator support is unprecedented. obviously you're too much of a mental midget to understand lazy evaluation

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-10 14:13

>>6
Closures can do everything generators can.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-10 14:23

1. Integers.
2.
             )}();
         )}();
    )}();
)}();

3. JEWS.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-10 14:25

Oh look, the Javashit kike is an epic troll! XD

Please stop bringing your imageboard customs to this textboard. You don't purposely start a ``troll'' thread in /prog/ that doesn't mention Jews or Leah.

Fuck off back to /g/.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-10 14:34

>>9
You're the only one who does this. Back to /g/ please.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-10 14:35

No modules, no integers, anal prolapse-loose type system, half-assed OOP implementation,
''        ==   '0'           //false
0         ==   ''            //true
0         ==   '0'           //true
false     ==   'false'       //false
false     ==   '0'           //true
false     ==   undefined     //false
false     ==   null          //false
null      ==   undefined     //true
" \t\r\n" ==   0             //true
, resource hog, optional usage of semicolons, ===, ambiguous syntax (new Function, seriously?), parseInt(), with, [code]hasOwnProperty()[code] (which also reminds me of the inconsistent capitalization of everything, no constants, fucked up scopes, the DOM is fucking shit, fucking C-style syntax for a ``functional'' programming language, inconsistent implementations across platforms (not even Java has fucked up this bad), pulled out of a kike's ass in less than 2 years, cruft on top of shit, hipster shit, the Javashit kike uses it.

[b][i][o][u][m][aa]Back to /g/, please.[/aa][/m][/u][/o][/i][/b]

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-10 14:36

>>11
Sorry for the unclosed tag.

No modules, no integers, anal prolapse-loose type system, half-assed OOP implementation, [code]
''        ==   '0'           //false
0         ==   ''            //true
0         ==   '0'           //true
false     ==   'false'       //false
false     ==   '0'           //true
false     ==   undefined     //false
false     ==   null          //false
null      ==   undefined     //true
" \t\r\n" ==   0             //true
, resource hog, optional usage of semicolons, ===, ambiguous syntax (new Function, seriously?), parseInt(), with, hasOwnProperty() (which also reminds me of the inconsistent capitalization of everything, no constants, fucked up scopes, the DOM is fucking shit, fucking C-style syntax for a ``functional'' programming language, inconsistent implementations across platforms (not even Java has fucked up this bad), pulled out of a kike's ass in less than 2 years, cruft on top of shit, hipster shit, the Javashit kike uses it.

Back to /g/, please.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-10 14:37

>>12
Forgot to comment out the tag. But I already made my point clear.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-10 14:38

>>11,12
I'm saving this kopipe.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-10 14:42

>>11,12
pulled out of a kike's ass in less than 2 years
um it was less than 10 days. get your facts straight

the fact that javascript could be developed that quickly is a testament to how elegant it is

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-10 14:44

>>15
What I meant is, any language that is planned for less than 2 years is shit.

Name: >>12 2013-02-10 14:45

>>16
Fuck off, you're not me.

>>15
How about you attack the argument directly instead of evading it with words such as ``elegant''? Oh, right, you ``troll'' the imageboard way. You fuck off too.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-10 14:47

>>15
Tried too hard. 1/10

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-10 14:49

>>17
sorry, i dont respond to posts containing logical fallacies

yours is an exception because it was so mind-bogglingly inane that it actually hurt to read

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-10 14:53

javascript ``in lisp''

Name: >>12 2013-02-10 14:54

>>17
fuck you fagshit

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-10 14:56

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-10 14:56

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-10 14:56

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-10 14:56

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-10 14:56

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-10 14:57

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-10 14:57

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-10 14:57

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-10 14:57

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-10 14:57

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-10 14:57

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-10 14:58

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-10 14:58

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-10 14:58

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-10 14:58

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-10 14:58

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-10 14:59

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-10 14:59

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-10 14:59


Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List