/prog/ - I love continuous integration

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-06 22:12

Is like programming....

IN THE FUTURE!

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-07 4:16

continuity is not a necessary condition for integrability

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-07 6:13

klowikg what op is talking about is not a necessary condition for posting in a thread

/prog/'s 3rd rule

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-07 6:14

>>3
s/klowikg/knowing/;

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-07 11:47

>>4
nice new meme :)

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-07 13:18

>>5
It'd be a shame if anything happened to it.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-07 14:53

>>6
Shalom!

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-07 15:59

>>7
Salam alalalalaykuboom!

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-07 20:53

.o88b. .d88b. .o88b. db dD db db db db db .d8888. d8P Y8 .8P Y8. d8P Y8 88 ,8P' 88 88 88 88 88 88' YP 8P 88 88 8P 88,8P 88 88 88 88 88 `8bo. 8b 88 88 8b 88`8b 88 88 88 88 88 `Y8b. Y8b d8 `8b d8' Y8b d8 88 `88. 88b d88 88booo. 88b d88 db 8D `Y88P' `Y88P' `Y88P' YP YD ~Y8888P' Y88888P ~Y8888P' `8888Y'

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-08 7:18

Cargo cult agility is the cancer of contemporary software development.

>>2
But is it sufficient?

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-08 8:30

>>10
Not every project needs TDD. Big ones definitively do. Unless you give a shit about code quality or your whole team is comprised of EXPERT PROGRAMMERS.

Continuous integration is not a 'cult'. Is just a tool that helps teams doing TDD to relieve the overhead of testing.

But TDD is a cult.

I can think of worse cults, like the LISP cult. Y'know, because LISP IS SHIT.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-08 9:10

>>11
Lisp can be compiled to better code than your Javascript shit will ever be.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-08 9:30

>>10
Every continuous function is integrable, so it is sufficient.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-08 10:08

>>1
define "continuous"

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-08 10:16

>>11
getting naked with your team mates is bad for your teeth

I love continuous integration

1 Name: Anonymous 2013-02-06 22:12

2 Name: Anonymous 2013-02-07 4:16

3 Name: Anonymous 2013-02-07 6:13

4 Name: Anonymous 2013-02-07 6:14

5 Name: Anonymous 2013-02-07 11:47

6 Name: Anonymous 2013-02-07 13:18

7 Name: Anonymous 2013-02-07 14:53

8 Name: Anonymous 2013-02-07 15:59

9 Name: Anonymous 2013-02-07 20:53

10 Name: Anonymous 2013-02-08 7:18

11 Name: Anonymous 2013-02-08 8:30

12 Name: Anonymous 2013-02-08 9:10

13 Name: Anonymous 2013-02-08 9:30

14 Name: Anonymous 2013-02-08 10:08

15 Name: Anonymous 2013-02-08 10:16