Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Jim the bro

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-24 18:48

do you still remember jim? damn i loved this crazy mother fucker..

Name: 2013-01-24 20:12

ၣ碄鄔蔓⡅←摙捒锁阆䘀蘶薒ᚑ∅ᙴ爕玁ᄴ遦ॖ∣㙹ᘂ憔奩ᥕ灱䀓࠹礡㥉挵怷塴静⡂甹ސ↔慐䞂兓卐憖䉹Ĺŵ╓犀錧Ѱ̐ᔳ᠗䥕睕㤨㙉傗ᝣ⤵瞕鍴ᔙ䈳衃㍱ݳ䘹┓悖㜸㉉卩聦☔啱㒈艢≲蒄⍗靀蔅煱⁡၆陘䔠䈀㆖匷⥱ᅒ掄䁅ᑆ噓聒䈙各睄椠桁牣倵⡕֔᎒䡨᥄≘鈢扳衴焃ᕧ妀㍅ܥ䕐⅁㥂耐螖怅瀶㝢琱䠒㤓撅閄₇㚉䡇Ճ႒銇ぃ瀰㝒鄇霱㉨ᒇ妖園⑦™鉳扠咄⤢䆒腩昘࠱嚗г㡆İ灸ᡦᜁ喈眡䈑閒蕃儨碀شܓ㥱᎑⌖〘ቧ⤱䌨昨蝵⁄⍈噀˜ʀ堠牰͂҈ㅃʗ疐倔圕猢ᔄ䍉剑祁椦撒䁤恢ѡղ䤰␰ታ࢒㤆ᙗ餖䈘奨Ι㈄ᚑ肓㑵ֈ恴頷ᡡ衩ᅀፗ木䍀畳ᅵ逓㊆數䠲梘礖捶ؘ⠩唇昰材ጱ匧瘠䒂朁ᥨ灩䁳ࠕ鈑补祶Ғ晸╙禆煳醓で團霉匢䞗呴鍹摲甠閙栗怗銕㍒䤔䕨䉠硸剔г适礔╩て␀❠㠇坨祰留႘蕉ₒ鑴䊈䠶爨⥄鑙茈攠硩莂┡㍔物椘蜃蘵ᔕစe㑷䀈靂∡⅖၄眤襷䈣㐦偁䆗㡡腇䀅㕡␨褣%䢀圔䐢餕䐸⒔⥱腸醉䢃ᜁ㉖֒ृ顢ႁ掂ݦᚔ顑钘邂晳≖萩猱葶॔膇阱腘她銇᠄瑱塂霷瀘䡆Ȩ荥⑘ᅧ蕷剰鑙腑圷ᕔङቁ桵鐐瞄ፗ䍡挘顓⍣褃匲皓晳時肔蔩鄇嘤扑錘㖒て葑扶ᤲ⒆奃ひ堧ᅣ䠣॒ɩ啓葐Ն╤䔂褁鄔垙剒㐄䠦䙠㡣搱逄蕷獦ȱ㌓ҕظᑲ嘩剩剷鑥֒挦ㅸ挵靗酣㜱恩蘢ᒉ礁⥗㑂核ᖒ’㄰晆礡ᄓᑳթញ饢饰襃愢餄፲錧遱ᙨ憉㥖灲餗犃邃灖㤵❖墇Ŵ饷钓梑萷䍄䁆剗ㆂ╨ቒ夸⥇䀉

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-31 22:51


Cantor also developed a large portion of the general theory of cardinal numbers; he proved that there is a smallest transfinite cardinal number (ℵ0, aleph-null) and that for every cardinal number, there is a next-larger cardinal

    (ℵ1, ℵ2, ℵ3...)

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-31 23:36


The logarithm of an infinite cardinal number κ is defined as the least cardinal number μ such that κ ≤ 2μ. Logarithms of infinite cardinals are useful in some fields of mathematics, for example in the study of cardinal invariants of topological spaces, though they lack some of the properties that logarithms of positive real numbers possess.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-01 0:21


This point of view does not mean that infinity cannot be used in physics. For convenience's sake, calculations, equations, theories and approximations often use infinite series, unbounded functions, etc., and may involve infinite quantities.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-01 1:07


Zermelo set theory, which replaces the axiom schema of replacement with that of separation;

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-01 1:53


For example, Russell's paradox suggests a proof that the class of all sets which do not contain themselves is proper, and the Burali-Forti paradox suggests that the class of all ordinal numbers is proper.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-01 2:37


A proof requiring the axiom of choice may establish the existence of an object without explicitly defining the object in the language of set theory. For example, while the axiom of choice implies that there is a well-ordering of the real numbers, there are models of set theory with the axiom of choice in which no well-ordering of the reals is definable.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-01 3:23


If two small categories are weakly equivalent, then they are equivalent.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List