void I_BEFORE_E(void)
{
puts("EYE BEFORE EEH! EYE BEFORE EEH! *GETS HANDCUFFS AND CURLS UP TO"
"THE NEAREST AUTHORITY FIGURE");
}
void EXCEPT_IN_THE_SEA(void)
{
puts("'cause I lost my glasses in there");
}
enum {
SEE, EYE, EEH, NOONOO, DONKEYS
};
static int aner(c)
{
switch (c) {
case 'c':
case 'C':
return SEE;
case 'i':
case 'I':
return EYE;
case 'e':
case 'E':
return EEH;
default:
;
}
return NOONOO;
}
>>12
I didn't forget my code tags as it is not code
Name:
Anonymous2013-01-02 14:25
>>13
But you did forget your teletype tags, as it is teletype.
Name:
Anonymous2013-01-02 14:40
>>3 http://www.stallman.org/stallman-computing I do not post on 4chan. I have nothing against it, and I have occasionally answered questions for interviews for 4chan, but any account there that says it is me is an impostor.
>>24
but dogg! this means the user doesn't have the freedom to change their configurations other than by the tools the manufacturer supplies!
Name:
RMS!jQFSmKo1CU2013-01-02 16:28
I'm not even a little chubby - I'm huge!
Name:
Anonymous2013-01-02 16:32
>>25
The controller circuit can be replaced with a user-supplied one. Hm, this is giving me plenty of ideas of new features like keeping food warm after it's done cooking or automatically calculating the time it takes for the heat to penetrate (say) meat given the weight and thickness. Thanks bro.
>>29
va te faire enculer, espèce de moisissure humain, de crétin fini
Name:
Anonymous2013-01-02 17:04
>>27
No worries, RMS! Looking forward to your epic battle with the forces of darkness when you realise that washing machines are non-free and therefore cannot be used (Expected to happen about 1982).
Name:
Anonymous2013-01-02 17:09
>>31
Just because you don't care about having your privacy and freedom raped by the highest bidder (government or corporation alike) doesn't mean anyone else has to. Fuck off, freedom-hating cretin.
>>32
Yawn. Go tell some more people that being forced to share source code is freedom.
Name:
Anonymous2013-01-02 18:04
>>35
I will, thank you. Closed-source code cannot be trusted, and violates my freedom of understanding how the product I bought works, as well as potentially violates my privacy and computer's security behind my back.
>>39
Because I don't trust the government nor corporations, both of which have demonstrated that they cannot be trusted? Fuck off, freedom-hating cretin.
Name:
Anonymous2013-01-02 19:20
>>39
Because I don't put my entire life on facebook so they can sell every last detail? Because I choose not to blindly trust software providers? Because I believe in secrecy of correspondence?
No, you should be committed to an institution, you authoritarian piece of shit.
Name:
RMS!jQFSmKo1CU2013-01-02 19:20
>>40
Thank you so much for spreading the message! If only you could do such a great job of losing me all this weight and excess neck hair so that I might procreate!
Name:
Anonymous2013-01-02 19:22
>>42
Procreate? Do you believe it to be ethical to put yet another human (who is likely to be a fucking idiot, statistically speaking) on this already overpopulated world?
Name:
Anonymous2013-01-02 19:23
>>41
There's a world between not using Facebook (Which, coincidentally, I don't) and supporting the GNU/GPL evil empire.
>>43
I am allowed to procreate, as long as my spawn carries a complete set of my genetic material. As I know nothing about humanity, I assume this is possible.
Name:
Anonymous2013-01-02 19:26
>>45
Open Source is a big place. You should be more specific.
>>47
How about something like the GPL, except the right to run the code is not covered by it, so users may have to purchase a license for that; before doing so, they can consult the source code and make sure it's really what they want (e.g. security audit). It's open source, and "free" as in freedom (to a certain extent), but not "free" as in beer.
>>43
Confirmed neocon, and irrational unlearning man. Shrewed is more appropriate. The earth, with all its resources, can maintain more than 30G humans just fine. Just not Wasters like petrol corps. Geothermal as well as Liquid fluoride thorium nuclear reactors are fine for the upkeep in energy. Even a decent plan to make portable nuclear reactors and tesla coils from the too. But no, americunts are afraid ghosts attacking their computer money.
>>55
Says the man that does not believe on RFID chips, which is a coil. There are also radios, completely power by a high voltage frequency. But I guess tesla coils sounds too fancy for you.
Someone wrote a post about abandoning English letters once. It might have been kopipe but it was certainly one of the top 10 /prague/ posts I have read.
Name:
RMS!jQFSmKo1CU2013-01-03 12:22
Can you believe people still listen to the bullshit that gushes out of me?
Name:
Anonymous2013-01-03 12:39
>>62
Nobody believes in RMS any longer, giving your own work away for free is the most retarded shit you'll ever hear.
Name:
Anonymous2013-01-03 12:47
>>63
It's like being a hooker (I love hookers btw) letting your clientele slamming your anus as much as they want, then just let them leave without paying you. You're expecting them to pity pay you, of course that doesn't happen and you'll not be able to buy pretty clothes and makeup to feel good about yourself, to compensate having your anus ravaged by disgusting pigs. So all you're left with is a - for life - swollen anus-flower and a deep hatred to your pimp RMS.
Name:
Anonymous2013-01-03 12:49
But you can still make money from free software! Just look at RMS--he got two $1m+ grants and free equipment and accommodation from MIT! If he can do it, why can't you?
Name:
Anonymous2013-01-03 12:57
>>65
Because he's the pimp basking in all the hard work our swollen anuses gives him. The rich loves this kind of sentimental tragedy and see no problems rewarding the pimp to keep the shit flowing.
We wait. We are bored. No, don't protest, we are bored to death, there's no denying it. Good. A diversion comes along and what do we do? We let it go to waste... In an instant all will vanish and we'll be alone once more, in the midst of nothingness!
>>81 Bed-sharing can lead to accidental suffocation of the infant in a number of ways. Prosecutors in several states (including Minnesota, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin[3] and Utah[4][5]) have charged parents with manslaughter[3][4][5] whose children died while bed-sharing when the parents were under the influence of drugs or alcohol.