Yes, I am a weeaboo. So? I dont see any problem. I embraced my japanese soul long ago and I am happy together with my real doll (who is a cute 8yo loli!). We don't any friends in or outside of the fandom and I am pretty fat and ugly looking.
But thanks anyway asshole. Go and have sex with your girlfriend while I'll fap to my anime porn.
Why is it that the simple progression of time and popularity justifies accepting gimmicky things on those premises alone? That's quite fallacious thinking. Computing, on a fundamental level, hasn't changed much since the transistor was introduced. And I haven't seen any fundamental breakthroughs in operating systems development. I guess this is where widespread privatization is leading us in regards to R&D.
>>11
I was going to link you to /g/, but then I realized you can use ``back button'' on your web browser, or, even better, open your trusty javashit console and write history.back().
a static page shouldn't be provided because it will take more resources for JavaScript users!
You can serve the board page with <a href="/catalog">Catalog</a> and then have JavaScript rewrite the link to <a href="#" onclick="loadFancyAjaxJsonCatalog()">Catalog</a>, which will Just Work for those without JavaScript and will seamlessly use the fancy JSON catalogue for those who do have it.
Web2.0 ``gurus'' a shit.
Name:
Anonymous2012-12-16 23:32
>>20
Or you could just put the regular javascript-less catalog inside a noscript tag (or just use ordinary html but let the javascript change/overwrite it). I can't see it being a huge waste of bandwidth any more than some random Anon visiting a board and refreshing once or twice.
>>43
The basic strokes of the box model are sensible and the syntax of CSS is fine, it's just all the details that come into play with a real web design that make it so shitty. It's so flawed because they can't please everyone at once, so they settled for pissing everyone off at once.