/prog/ - [x language] is better than Lisp

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 7:12

Because it's easier to pick up when you're not intelligent enough to use Lisp effectively.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 7:13

Agree!

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 8:12

All languages created after 1975 (and most of those created before) are better than any Lisp.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 8:16

>>3
By the lemma in >>1, you are correct.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 8:51

>>4
No, some languages are worse than Lisp. For example, PHP, Javascript and old versions of Visual Basic... that's it. All other languages are better than Lisp.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 9:21

>>5
Nice try, cretin.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 9:33

>>5
You forgot Java, Sepples and FIOC.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 9:39

>>7
Java, Sepples and FIOC have at least some useful type system and/or useful data structures.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 9:45

>>8
Types and data are great, but they don't actually form a program.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 11:02

>>3
>>5
>>8
Shalom!

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 11:05

>>10
Jihad your al-quotes, Ahmed Ackboom.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 11:51

javascript is lisp for the future

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 12:28

>>3
Yeah, like Ruby on Rails!

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 14:05

>>12
le javascript is le future of le lisp

ROFL UR SO FUCKING EPIB OMG I SHAT MY SIDES BCUZ UR SO FUCKIN FUNNY HOLY SHIT XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD 5 FUCKING UPBOATS FOR DA BEST POST ON THE INTERREDDITS XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 17:16

>>14
https://github.com/manuel/wat-js

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 17:21

Wat is an ultra-lightweight, advanced, and practical Lisp for JavaScript, in which everything is first-class: syntax, control, and data.
HIBT?

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 17:47

>>16
This only sounds like a troll if you don't know much of Lisp or JavaScript.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 18:36

>>17
First-class syntax? In Javascript?

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-24 6:12

>>15
Not R5RS, not interested.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-24 6:46

Not Abelson R5RS, not interested.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-24 8:29

Not Symta, not interested.

[x language] is better than Lisp

1 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 7:12

2 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 7:13

3 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 8:12

4 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 8:16

5 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 8:51

6 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 9:21

7 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 9:33

8 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 9:39

9 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 9:45

10 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 11:02

11 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 11:05

12 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 11:51

13 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 12:28

14 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 14:05

15 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 17:16

16 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 17:21

17 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 17:47

18 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 18:36

19 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-24 6:12

20 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-24 6:46

21 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-24 8:29