Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Paranoid hardware [PART XVII]

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-20 8:36

Any desktops/laptops/motherboards/SoCs that do not require closed-source firmware blobs out there?

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-28 6:29

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

>>160
Very funny, homofaggot.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iF4EAREKAAYFAlDdgnQACgkQGRQwWY30ng17swD8CtYGTI051+QkYknfxOR08ttY
n6NAR0qf04CU/fBsrqQA/A3qAQglDGafuiFa3mDA467guwt2C1VA5/R3xGnFftvk
=BSB+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-07 12:08

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-07 14:30

>>148,150
are you making a cubieboard laptop?

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-11 22:00

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-11 22:00

The OLPC.

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-16 3:02

>>165
Niggerware.

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-16 3:31

>>166
Yep, and we non-niggers can't buy that. Too bad, it's excellent.
- coreboot
- amazing display (between e-ink and lcd, you can read outside)
- you can charge it with absolutely anything. DC, AC, any voltage, it will charge.

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-16 4:07

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-16 5:25

>>168
The tablet isn't that good. I should have been more precise: I was referring to the XO-1.
You can only find one on ebay for twice the price.

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-16 11:31

>>167
- amazing display (between e-ink and lcd, you can read outside)
is there somewhere you can buy those for cheap? I'd like one for a DIY project

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-16 14:57

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-16 15:06

>>171
It's more expansive than the XO itself.

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-16 15:12

>>171
WOW WHAT THE FUCK. Seriously, I could buy a Kindle for 80$ and pay a neckbeard 120$ to reverse engineer the controller chip.

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-16 15:14

>>173
Try to play a video on the kindle screen.

Name: 170,173 2013-01-16 15:19

>>174
I actually just want something I can comfortably read/write text (and code) on, colour not required. IIRC the kindle screen has a really crappy refresh, but I don't really mind.

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-16 15:22

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-16 15:30

>>176
I don't want whatever is displayed to go through the kindle. I don't trust their software.

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-16 15:32

>>175
If an Eink display is good enough, you can get a 6" B&W module for about $40.

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-16 18:19

>>178
Link?

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-17 12:49

bump

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-17 16:08

>>178
Don't those require wacky custom interfaces to drive? Get ready to write some fucking low-level drivers for the GPIO pins on your dev board.

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-17 17:03

>>181
That's why you buy a controller chip with a standard bus interface and built-in waveform memory and thermal correction.

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-17 17:12

>>182
controller chip
Don't those require wacky custom interfaces protocols to drive? Get ready to write some fucking low-level drivers for the GPIO $bus_interface pins on your dev board.

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-17 17:13

>>178,182
WHERE CAN I GET THIS STUFF?

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-17 17:16

>>184
fuck off, retard

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-17 17:30

>>184
You can order it online.

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-17 18:13

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-17 18:17

>>187
duckduckgo.com
Tsk. https://www.startpage.com/

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-17 18:21

>>188
https://www.startpage.com/
What a moron, I can't believe it.

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-17 18:24

>>189
Tsk.

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-17 18:29

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-17 22:48

>>185
fuck you dipshit

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-19 23:41

restoring...

Name: LISPPER 2013-01-27 14:54

>>20
Interesting idea, maybe one could make a Lisp machine like that.

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-27 14:57

the nes dose not requir firmware 2 run

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-28 0:53

>>195
I'm pretty sure the Arduino is faster than a NES, and that's saying a lot.

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-28 2:07

>>196
Putting aside that ``the Arduino'' isn't a thing, you can't meaningfully compare different processor architectures like that.

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-28 9:27

>>197
Yes, you're right, I just meant from a general-purpose-computation point of view.

I read about people connecting their AVRs to DRAM chips but apparently the manual refresh takes up about 10% CPU power.  Maybe I could use a second AVR to do that?  Maybe I could use the second AVR as a system bus and memory cache as well.  Although 8 KiB isn't a lot.  Also, I'm not sure about the extra latency involved in memory accesses.

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-28 13:59

>>20,194-198
PIC, AVR and 6502 are in a much slower class of hardware. An FPGA would be much faster and more extensible.

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-28 14:26

>>198
Switch the design to use SRAM instead of adding a second processor for memory refresh.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List