/prog/ - why aren't you using bigloo?

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-20 2:50

http://www-sop.inria.fr/mimosa/fp/Bigloo/

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-20 3:36

.fr
Le Reddit, please!

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-20 9:08

>>2
va te goinfrer de hamburgers, ``américain''

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-20 11:36

>>3
``états-unien´´

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-20 11:54

>>3
Fuck off, Yannick.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-20 12:03

>>5
va donc te faire enculer, pédé

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-20 12:08

Yannick = Shlomo same

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-20 15:00

I just took a bigpoo!

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-20 15:33

Why does the French language have to be ugly as a kike?

It's like a gay nigger from Portugal started gargling cum and posting on Reddit. That's how French came to be.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-20 18:41

>>9
French is exactly this. Now some retarded saxons try to speak it and you've got english, this creole of french (french was a creole of latin).

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-20 18:43

>>10
U MENA British.

American is the best language in the world.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-20 19:21

>>11
Yeah, Americans deliberately mutated English to remove Francophone influences while still keeping words like ``résumé.''
Go Buckeyes.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-20 19:58

>>10
What did they do before they had no language?

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-20 20:00

>>13
Eat snails and shitpost on Reddit.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-20 20:10

le bumpé

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-20 21:28

Bigloo enables full connections between Scheme and C programs
Where do I start? My cock is throbbing right now and there's going to be lots of problems if I don't take care of that soon.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-20 21:47

>>16
Hopefully it doesn't inherit scheme's eval, for scheme's eval is fucking shit.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-20 22:05

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Name: >>1 2012-11-20 22:22

my fibs profiling shows that native bigloo is as fast as native ocaml, ten times slower than gcc -O3 c, five times slower than javac java, three times faster than compiled ghc haskell, 5 times faster than interpreted lua, 11 times faster than spider monkey javascript, 10 times faster than interpreted python.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-20 22:36

>>19
You obviously don't know Haskell.
I've written fibs in Haskell that easily outperformed GMP's mpz_fib_ui.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-20 22:39

>>20
You obviously don't understand my intentions in running an equivalent program on many implementations to get a feel for relative speed?

Name: >>21 2012-11-20 23:22

>>20
And I find this suspicious. Are you sure it wasn't due to constant folding?

>>23-
check my dubs.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-21 5:37

>>22
Yes, I'm sure it wasn't due to constant folding. The program I used to benchmark it doesn't know which fib it's going to have to calculate until run time.
time ./fib 10000000 > /dev/null

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-21 9:18

>>19
11 times faster than spider monkey javascript
Well, the Javashit kike will probably pull some stupid ``argument'' (read: trolling) out of his ass.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-21 9:53

>>24
It's not V8, so who cares?

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-21 12:07

>>23
Interesting. Then all I can think would be the algorithmic complexity or maybe you're using one of those parallelizing haskell compilers I've been hearing about, or maybe GMP just sucks ass.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-21 13:22

>>26
A parallelizing compiler might have made it easier, but yeah, using parallelism was the only way I could figure out to beat GMP.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 0:21

>>27
neat.

why aren't you using bigloo?

1 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-20 2:50

2 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-20 3:36

3 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-20 9:08

4 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-20 11:36

5 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-20 11:54

6 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-20 12:03

7 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-20 12:08

8 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-20 15:00

9 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-20 15:33

10 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-20 18:41

11 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-20 18:43

12 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-20 19:21

13 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-20 19:58

14 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-20 20:00

15 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-20 20:10

16 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-20 21:28

17 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-20 21:47

18 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-20 22:05

19 Name: >>1 2012-11-20 22:22

20 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-20 22:36

21 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-20 22:39

22 Name: >>21 2012-11-20 23:22

23 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-21 5:37

24 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-21 9:18

25 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-21 9:53

26 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-21 12:07

27 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-21 13:22

28 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 0:21