Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Disappointment

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-07 20:18

I was really excited when I found out that they would be including inline ruby code in HTML5 (<ruby>puts "CHUNKY BACON!"</ruby>), but no browsers implement it correctly yet 0_0

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-07 20:26

Reddit might be interested in your fucking epic story, /b/ro.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-07 20:28

ruby is a shit language for faggots. fuck you OP.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-07 20:38

>>1
You had me there for a second. Consider your troll successful

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-07 21:25

why would you need that piece of shit when you could use javascript instead?

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-07 21:49

>>5
Because Ruby's type system does not require a lobotomy to be tolerated.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-07 21:58

>>5
The Javashit troll forgot how to capitalize.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-07 22:22

>>7
gb2 visual basic if you want capitalization, ``faggot''

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-07 22:28

>>8
gb2 hacker news if you want javashit, ``kike''

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-07 22:50

Give me a moment, I need pee:
.
 .
  .
   .
    .
     .
      .
       .
        .
         .
          .
           .
            .
             .
              .
....................................
......................................
.........................................

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-08 10:06

You guys will never appreciate the greatness of javascript. Play with your toy projects in lisp while real men create complex and beautiful websites in javascript(and make a fuckton of money).

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-08 10:41

>>11
now we have two javashit kikes

fuck off shlomo

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-08 10:56

For fuck's sake, when are the browser makers stop fucking around and agree on a proper VM so that we may program in decent languages.

In the mean time, we have to put up with Javashit's idiotic, useless type coercions even if we try to escape it by using languages which ``compile'' down to it.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-08 11:06

when are the browser makers stop fucking around
Never. It's too late for that.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-08 11:08

This is our only hope.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Native_Client

I don't trust Jewgle, though.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-08 11:44

>>15
executing foreign machine code locally (even when ``checked'' by their safety verifier), that's totally safe

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-08 11:57

>>16
I'm worried about security too. They claim it's going to be sandboxed, but seriously, I'm too paranoid for that.

However, that's the closest we'll ever get to a reasonable and decent ``browser programming language''

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-08 12:03

>>17
IIRC someone ported CL to Javascript.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-08 12:06

>>18
that's worse than pissing on your hand before you shake jesus's

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-08 12:24

>>15
All this stuff keeps making me think we've come full circle. We can already run machine code on our computer, why does it have to be inside a Web browser?

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-08 12:26

>>15
Sandboxing is Jewish. The Jews want to sandbox all of reality, and lock us inside of the sandbox while they roam freely outside of it.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-08 12:31

>>20
Because then users cannot be (as easily) tracked and served advertisements

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-09 2:00

>>22
Advertising is a Jewish invention.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-09 4:15

>>18,19
this shit: http://lispyscript.com/

Give me a few more years, I'll force a LISP like language on browsers as mandatory plugins. Luakit is doing fine with lua.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-09 8:03

>>24
You've got Hop and scheme2js: http://www-sop.inria.fr/indes/scheme2js/
biwascheme: http://www.biwascheme.org/
(Very nice, btw
<script src="biwascheme.js">
(display "hello, world!")
</script>
(There's also, Parenscript, but everybody knows it already).
Queinnec's paper on Continuations and Web Servers http://www.itu.dk/people/mir/teaching/amp-spring-2009/queinnec-caws.pdf is a good read and gave me some nice ideas.

I tried both compilers. They're almost ok. Documentation is scarce and I haven't managed to port my code yet. Biwascheme claims to be "Most syntax/base library of R6RS ".
Hop would be a better node.js but I'm very pessimistic.
Those academic people made an ugly website, have poor communication and so on. I see the fail coming. You need to have a friendly community of decent size and cool webapps to show on HN. Wake up!

Anyway I will never be satisfied with compiling to Java
script: I try sometimes to stick with good old non floating Arithmetic and I don't want to have Double as the only type. I'd like to be wrong about this, I don't know shit about V8 and friends

Name: 25 2012-11-09 8:05

Javascript*

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-09 8:38

>>24
Nice work. I haven't tried lispyscript yet and may have forgotten it exists if you didn't post. So, thanks.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-09 14:14

>>24,27
No, it's awful. Even just reading the home page gives me a prolapse.

Name: Parallel Lisp 2012-11-09 14:14

I just stumbled upon this
http://lparallel.org/

Quite neat.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-09 14:35

>>29
I'd like to see an Erlang implementation.

Name: 2012-11-10 6:32

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-10 7:16

>>24,37
U 2 R naught getin de pik sure.
Get rid of JS altogether. Unless you are trolling.

>>29
Nice. A shame he used wordpress. I'll warn him before I defile the site. I'd be a shame if he does nothing.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-10 8:24

>>32
Get rid of JS altogether. Unless you are trolling.

I'd like to, but how? Do you foresee the end of web browsers any time soon? Unless you are trolling.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-10 8:26

disappointment: women see me naked

Also, I didn't get dubs.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-10 8:46

>>33
Yeah, I realized my ENTERPRISE DERP after a nice shower. If not, HTML would have never been made. Tim Berners-Lee must have been high when he made it, without thinking of using troff or SGML. troof would have made the best sense.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-10 12:58

>>35
What would be the purpose of using SGML?

Seriously, retards, you always go ``XD HTML is shit but SGML is le better'' when both are equally shitty and clearly inferior to S-expressions.

I don't have anything against troff, by the way.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-11 6:52

>>36

links, the main purpose of HT ML, and silly markup that //symbols// could not satisfy Tim's **typography** hunger.
Still, gopher was way ahead of its time, and still it.

glad we concur troff was awesome. May mandoc continue to prosper.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-12 6:27

> BACON

LOL LE NARWAL EATS BACON AT MIDNIGHT

BACK TO LE REDDIT

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-12 6:43

>>36
s-exp
superior
((())))

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-12 9:18

>>38
You've obviously never read _why's poignant guide.
Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -