Privilege is an idiotic abstraction and you should go get fucked in the ass non-consensually for using it.
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-29 21:52
OH NO THE MALE PIGS ARE TRYING TO SILENCE US
I won't be attending any Linux Foundation events he's involved in organising. If I'm running any events, I won't be inviting him.
LET'S SILENCE THEM BACK! Die in a fire.
From Ted Ts'o's stuff: There is a spectrum of what can be considered "rape". One of the things which I think is dishonest is when the loosest possible definition of rape is used when creating the statistics, but when it comes down to saying how horribly women are affected by rape, the worst possible scenario is used.
I must admit, that's a good point.
Not that I'm justifying miscommunication leading to sex; but I do characterize that as being different than being raped at gunpoint.
That's when you're wrong, it is the same thing. If the person keeps saying ,,no'' and/or slaps/punches you in the face, well, it's rape. If you used violence for coercion, it's rape and assault.
But miscommunication doesn't have the same emotional impact as **rape**, so guess which term people with an agenda use?
They're the same thing. The problem is with your definition; rape is defined as non-consensual sex. There is no violent coercion criterion involved, and just because some idiotic male-hating so-called ``feminists'' decided it would be a good idea to only portray/publicize the most heinous and violent cases of rape, that doesn't change the real definition of rape, much like the fact that many people who call themselves feminists are actually sexists doesn't change the real definition either.
>>3 just because ... doesn't change the real defintion either.
Couldn't be more wrong, learn about the fluidity of language and the application of definition to the real world.
Definitions change, no matter how much you want to pretend they don't. Enjoy your delusion that only you adhere to.
>>9
Sexism is defined as discrimination based on sex or gender.
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-30 2:30
>>3 the real definition of rape
is jurisdiction dependent.
also dubs.
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-30 2:51
What the fuck am I reading!?
So basically this Ted guy points out references to the probable source of rape statistics and this Matthew guy is going on a full retard slanderfest about what he thinks he's reading between the lines. At least, half his commenters do point this out. Am I missing context?
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-30 5:58
I used to think that programmers were a ``guild'' where some degree of intelligence was required. Now, with all those hipster shit, it's filled with idiots. I consider myself a liberal, but this is too much. Just like the BI6B00B5 polemic, this is just idiotic.
I posted this to him
"I'll be interacting with him to the bare minimum that I'm compelled to as a result of my job. I won't be attending any Linux Foundation events he's involved in organising. If I'm running any events, I won't be inviting him."
Clearly you don't deserve to be called a professional, but a crybaby.
>>14 When I first read Ts’o’s comments, I couldn’t sleep for two nights. I wanted to throw up every time I thought about it. I was furious and frightened at the same time. Every time I think about this, even now, I literally have nightmares. I can’t bear the thought of working with him even over email, much less attending the same conferences. I worry that my career in Linux is over if I can’t work with him.
Wow. Seriously? But wait, there's an explanation: http://valerieaurora.org/keith.html
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-30 8:56
>>15
And then some people say that responsible sex with children is harmless. No, it's not, we get people like this Valerie rabidly attacking Linux as a result. Next time you're thinking about having a little fun with some girl, keep in mind that she might grow up to sow strife and dissent in the Free Software community, and it would be your fault.
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-30 9:05
Bitches just want all the attention all of the time. That's one of their innate behaviors. Just look at her pics. What a butch. Clearly a butthurt lesbian with daddy issues. The influx of feminists into the software world is akin to cancer growth and must be culled.
>>3 that doesn't change the real definition of rape
Yeah, the real definition of rape is non-consensual sex (even if no actual sex occured), and if it did, the female party is free to declare it non-consensual post factum
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-30 16:18
solution: don't get drunk if you can't handle it, or don't want to embarrass yourself, or don't want to get raped.
<html>
<head>
<script>
window.onload = function() {
var body = document.getElementsByTagName('body')[0];
var sexpr = body.getAttribute('data-sexpr');
body.appendChild(parse_sexpr(sexpr));
};
function parse_sexpr(sexpr) {
/* Implementation is left as an exercise to the reader. */
}
</script>
</head>
<body data-sexpr="
(p
(span
(/attr style "color: red; font-weight: bold;")
"hax my anus" ))
"></body>
</html>
The end result would obviously be a DOM tree like this:
<html>
<body>
<p>
<span style="color: red; font-weight: bold;">hax my anus</span>
</p>
</body>
</html>
function parse_sexpr(text) {
// Implementation is left as an excercise to the reader.
}
</script>
</head>
<body data-sexpr>
<span style="white-space: pre; font-family: monospace;"><span style="color: darkkhaki; font-weight: bold;">(</span><span style="color: darkred">p</span>
<span style="color: darkkhaki; font-weight: bold;">(</span><span style="color: darkred">span</span>
<span style="color: darkkhaki; font-weight: bold;">(</span><span style="color: darkred">/attr</span> style <span style="color: green">"color: red; font-weight: bold;"</span><span style="color: darkkhaki; font-weight: bold;">)</span>
<span style="color: green">"hax my anus"</span> <span style="color: darkkhaki; font-weight: bold;">))</span></span>
</body>
</html>
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-30 23:12
>>32 https://...google.../jquery.min.js
- Use of cryptography (Jewish-dominated field)
- Google (Jewish owned and operated)
- Javashit (creator Jewish)
- Jquery (creator is Jewish)