Name:
Anonymous
2012-10-29 19:53
Hey /prog/, we might have a janitor soon.
Opinions?
Name:
Anonymous
2012-10-30 4:05
so do we just reimplement 190 chan in coq or what?sage
Name:
Anonymous
2012-10-30 4:26
>>10
fuk mannnn
let's make a text board protocol that's independent of HTTP.
Name:
VIPPER
2012-10-30 5:52
Why wasnt this abomination of a board aborted already.
Name:
Anonymous
2012-10-30 6:11
>>43
Because there still are dubz left to get. Check 'em.
Name:
Anonymous
2012-10-30 6:45
>>44
Not for long, this board has already passed peak dubz.
Name:
Anonymous
2012-10-30 7:00
>>45
Binary dubs are still there, untapped.
Name:
Anonymous
2012-10-30 7:21
>>47
Extraction of binary dubs is unsafe and not economically viable.
Name:
Anonymous
2012-10-30 10:15
>>47,48
Binary dubs considered unscientific and ultimately destructive.
Name:
Anonymous
2012-10-30 10:19
>>49
Once the economy tanks, dubs will be the only currency of value.