>>21
Gödel was an atheist. His incompleteness theorems don't have anything to do with anything and
>>16 is (quoting) an idiot, obviously, but he did formally reformulate the ontological argument, which has led ``sophisticated'' Christians to claim him.
What they're missing is that his effort was motivated by a desire to show it to be logical nonsense, not to prove God exists. When he found the argument was valid he became depressed, but he never converted. And why would he, after all? The ontological argument isn't an argument for the Christian god specifically.
(Why he didn't realise the premises are absurd is a different matter.)