/prog/ - ANTI IF CAMPAIGN

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 0:26

The goal of the Anti-IF Campaign is to raise awareness of effective use of the Object-Oriented Paradigm, first of all removing bad, dangerous IFs.

http://www.antiifcampaign.com/

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 0:31

Shalom!

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 0:47

Smells like band-aids.

Name: Cudder !MhMRSATORI!fR8duoqGZdD/iE5 2012-10-05 1:06

Also known as the Anti-Efficiency Campaign.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 1:20

Craig Larman
Sounds like kikes are trying to sell some new hyped shit.

OOP is full of kikes, like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Stepanov and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bertrand_Meyer

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 1:21

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Craig_Larman
Practices for Scaling Lean & Agile Development: Large, Multisite, and Offshore Product Development with Large-Scale Scrum

that is a large number of buzzwords for single title.

Name: Cudder !MhMRSATORI!fR8duoqGZdD/iE5 2012-10-05 1:25

And now for a message from the other extreme...

http://programming-motherfucker.com/

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 3:23

>>4,7
Even in C there are situations where I'd rather add a function pointer than litter control statements all over the place. The key is knowing what approach works best for a given situation.

http://programming-motherfucker.com/
Unfortunately there are just too ignorant developers in the world. It seems to be too much even to ask for ones that are at least conscious of their own creeping idiocy.

>>6
Obviously designed to appeal to non-technical managers. It's really frightening to me how people think putting people without a programming background in charge of software developers is anything but a horrible idea.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 3:27

Object-Orientation is Computational Marxism

The Myths of Object-Orientation: http://www.springerlink.com/content/n7143830149p6861/

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 3:29

>>9
Only by keeping the object-oriented faith can we ensure full-spectrum object-oriented dominance for the next forty years in the project for a new object-oriented century!

Oy vey!

Name: Cudder !MhMRSATORI!fR8duoqGZdD/iE5 2012-10-05 4:00

>>9
USD $29.95
Fucking bastards!

/r/ PDF MIRROR PLZ!!!111

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 4:10

The goal of the Anti-virtual Campaign is to raise awareness of effective use of INLINING MOTHERFUCKER and BRANCH PREDICTION, first of all removing bad, dangerous virtual functions.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 4:12

>>11
Spasibo! https://2ch.so/sci/arch/src/mith.pdf

Name: Cudder !wWUoyFhd1c!fR8duoqGZdD/iE5 2012-10-05 4:43

>>13
Мусор.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 5:09

>>14
I'm not sure how I should interpret this.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 5:22

Listen, I came here to talk to some native English speakers, but I've just realized everyone in here is a damned Russian. What the hell should I do now?

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 5:29

>>16
apologize.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 5:35

>>16
XAXAXAXAXAXAXAXAXAXAXA

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 6:39

>>16
but I've just realized everyone in here is a damned Russian
Проснулся, лолка.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 8:26

>>1
That site is a mess.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 9:50

>>1
what the heck, is that a real thing?

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 10:09

>>21
Yeah, but it's very misleading. They're saying ``don't use ifs for checking types, use polymorphism instead''.

Well, obviously, faggots.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 11:20

>>1
Fuck you, I use C.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 11:24

>>23
implying that people don't use polymorphism in C.
It sucks being a Russian, doesn't it?

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 11:24

>>23
Then use function pointers.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 11:31

>>1
How in the fuck did they figure dynamic type checking is safe? It's per definition unknown, which per definition is fucking bad.

Sounds like the only reason to use it is because it's a feature in the language. Anti-pattern right there.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 11:52

>>24
le implying epic meme reddito/b/ro XDDDDD

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 11:52

>>2
Can you stop with that stupid fucking shalom bullshit.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 12:02

>>28
Shalom!

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 12:04

>>16
I've just realized everyone in here is a damned Russian.
most of them are Jewish Russian.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 15:40

>>28
Shalom, Benjamin!

ANTI IF CAMPAIGN

1 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 0:26

2 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 0:31

3 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 0:47

4 Name: Cudder !MhMRSATORI!fR8duoqGZdD/iE5 2012-10-05 1:06

5 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 1:20

6 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 1:21

7 Name: Cudder !MhMRSATORI!fR8duoqGZdD/iE5 2012-10-05 1:25

8 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 3:23

9 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 3:27

10 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 3:29

11 Name: Cudder !MhMRSATORI!fR8duoqGZdD/iE5 2012-10-05 4:00

12 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 4:10

13 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 4:12

14 Name: Cudder !wWUoyFhd1c!fR8duoqGZdD/iE5 2012-10-05 4:43

15 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 5:09

16 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 5:22

17 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 5:29

18 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 5:35

19 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 6:39

20 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 8:26

21 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 9:50

22 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 10:09

23 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 11:20

24 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 11:24

25 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 11:24

26 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 11:31

27 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 11:52

28 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 11:52

29 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 12:02

30 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 12:04

31 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 15:40

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 0:26

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 0:31

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 0:47

Name: Cudder !MhMRSATORI!fR8duoqGZdD/iE5 2012-10-05 1:06

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 1:20

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 1:21

Name: Cudder !MhMRSATORI!fR8duoqGZdD/iE5 2012-10-05 1:25

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 3:23

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 3:27

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 3:29

Name: Cudder !MhMRSATORI!fR8duoqGZdD/iE5 2012-10-05 4:00

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 4:10

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 4:12

Name: Cudder !wWUoyFhd1c!fR8duoqGZdD/iE5 2012-10-05 4:43

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 5:09

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 5:22

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 5:29

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 5:35

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 6:39

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 8:26

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 9:50

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 10:09

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 11:20

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 11:24

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 11:24

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 11:31

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 11:52

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 11:52

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 12:02

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 12:04

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-05 15:40