Name:
Anonymous
2012-10-03 0:05
for(i=0;i<x;i++)
for(j=0;j<y;j++)
foo(i,j);
xorl %ebx, %ebx
subl $12, %esp
movl 12(%ebp), %edi
jmp .L3
.L4:
pushl %eax
pushl %eax
pushl %esi
incl %esi
pushl %ebx
call foo
addl $16, %esp
jmp .L5
.L6:
xorl %esi, %esi
.L5:
cmpl %edi, %esi
jl .L4
incl %ebx
.L3:
cmpl 8(%ebp), %ebx
jl .L6
leal -12(%ebp), %esp
for(i=0,j=0;i<x;i++) {
foo(i,j);
if(++j == y)
j = 0;
}
xorl %ebx, %ebx
movl 12(%ebp), %edi
jmp .L8
.L10:
pushl %edx
pushl %edx
pushl %ebx
incl %ebx
pushl %esi
call foo
xorl %eax, %eax
addl $16, %esp
cmpl %edi, %ebx
setne %al
incl %esi
negl %eax
andl %eax, %ebx
.L8:
cmpl 8(%ebp), %esi
jl .L10
Name:
Anonymous
2012-10-03 0:11
AT&T syntax
PIG DISGUSTING
Name:
Anonymous
2012-10-03 0:19
Sure, it's flat, but is it Abelson flat?
Name:
Anonymous
2012-10-03 0:52
DELICIOUS FLAT LOOP
the cases aren't even equivalent outside of carefully picked values for x and y
Name:
Cudder
!MhMRSATORI!fR8duoqGZdD/iE5
2012-10-03 4:44
pushl %edx
pushl %edx
pushl %ebx
incl %ebx
pushl %esi
WTF?