Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-

LOLI THREAD DELETED!

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-01 23:05

https://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1348951973 , It is no more!

Who would do such a thing?

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-01 23:09

Jews also deleted most of the of the anti-semitic threads.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-01 23:19

It's a shame the entire loli thread was deleted, there were some interesting insights on how society should deal with that mental illness.

The jew threads were spam, though.  Good riddance.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-01 23:25

>>3
Shalom, Hymie!

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-01 23:37

/prog/ is dead. We are under occupation by the /q/ews.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 0:03

>>5
Sure, /prog/ is dead. But is it Abelson dead?

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 0:18

>>6
Sure, your meme is shitty and forced, but is it as shitty and forced as my dick in your anus?

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 0:19

Sure, Lisp is godly, but is it Sussman godly?

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 1:11

>>4
Slalom, Hippie!

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 2:11

So, the fingers of the jews have reached even here.
My fellow VIPPERs, this officially marks the end of /prog/ and dis/world4ch/world2ch, it is now nothing more than a shallow husk of what it once was, with imageboard jews and reddit shabbos-goyim residing in the carcass.
It was a good run, I love all of you (except for the filthy kikes and brainwashed kike worshippers of course) and may DADDY COOL bless the rest of your days with VIP QUALITY!

As for the shitweasels who will remain, go suck off autistic niggers, get AIDS, and die.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 2:52

Moot doesn't make money from textboards. 4chan Pass is another part of the imageboard cash cow.
``All I wanna say is that they don't really care about us.''

Name: VIPPER 2012-10-02 2:54

>>10
Hey! Youre not the real VIPPER!

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 3:39

>>11
>4chan
>cash cow
pick one

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 3:53

>>10
Awesome, does this mean you're leaving?

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 4:00

Hax my zionist anus.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 4:22

http://boards.4chan.org/q/res/213976

So you just post the threads you don't like on /q/ and they delete them without even looking whether they are relevant or not? Amazing.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 4:46

>>16
Jewshit and pedoshit is not relevant, Ahmed.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 7:31

I can't believe it.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 9:54

I would argue for creating a Tor hidden-service based textboard, but then again I would have deleted the pedoposts myself.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 13:12

What's moot's address?

I need to tell my hitman where to go....

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 13:15

#define MODS "FAGS"

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 13:29

>>21
warning: 'MODS' : macro redefinition

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 13:48

>>19
How about a freenet bbs?

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 14:15

1. Do not upload, post, discuss, request, or link to, anything that violates local or United States law. This will be severely punished and strictly enforced.
Lolikon is against United States law[1], therefore discussing it is against the rules.

____________
[1] http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1466A

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 14:45

LOLICON LOLICON LOLICON
LOLICON LOLICON LOLICONLOLICON LOLICON LOLICONLOLICON LOLICON LOLICONLOLICON LOLICON LOLICONLOLICON LOLICON LOLICONLOLICON LOLICON LOLICON
LOLICON LOLICON LOLICONLOLICON LOLICON LOLICONLOLICON LOLICON LOLICON
LOLICON LOLICON LOLICON
LOLICON LOLICON LOLICON
LOLICON LOLICON LOLICON
LOLICON LOLICON LOLICON
LOLICON LOLICON LOLICON
LOLICON LOLICON LOLICON
LOLICON LOLICON LOLICON

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 14:47

why would he do that! die in a fire mods!

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 14:53

>>24
So we cant discuss antisemitism, niggers, software piracy and post Windows 8 serial keys? Is this some family safe forum for little kids?

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 15:00

>>24
No it's not, SCOTUS said it was okay, fuck off back to /q/.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 15:02

>>24
Do not (...) discuss, (...) anything that violates local or United States law.
Wow, that's shitty.  So making a thread about circumventing software patents or DRM isn't allowed?  I wonder if they deleted the leaked HDCP key -- if they did, I'm starting a tor BBS (and I'll finally be able to moderate the self-hating jew shitspammer as well as the pedoshit).

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 15:06

>>29
Shalom!

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 15:11

>>30
Slalom, Hippie!

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 15:13

>>29
No one would use it. Moderators ruin everything. Might as well go back to stackoverflow, faggot.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 15:20

>>29
Tor is silly.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 15:46

>>32
Are you one of the paedos?

>>33
Why?

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 15:54

>>34
I couldn't get it to work.
Also freenet/gnunet/darknet etc just seem a better idea.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 16:06

>>34
Are you one of the paedos?
No, but no one would use it and not only is moderation shit, you can't even ban people in onionland and they'd just keep reposting it.

Don't suffer under any delusions that your prowess as a programmer translate to being a good site admin. You'd probably be no different than Kimmo Alm.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 16:11

Not every sager is a weeaboo
Almost every weeaboo is a sager
Every weeaboo is a pedophile

/prog/ is full of pedos

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 17:16

>>35
What platform?  Here on Debian it just worked with the default configuration file.

>>36
you can't even ban people in onionland and they'd just keep reposting it
Using a hashcash-like scheme, it's possible.  It can be very easy and convenient.

Don't suffer under any delusions that your prowess as a programmer translate to being a good site admin.
How about this: the only content that gets moderated is paedophile shit, and spam.  How does that sound?

You'd probably be no different than Kimmo Alm.
Unlike him, I'm not a fucking paedophile.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 17:28

Lolies! I love them!

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 18:02

I would argue for creating a Tor hidden-service based textboard,
I mentioned the current situation here to the administrator of an existing hidden-service textboard, and this happened:
http://qm3monarchzifkwa.onion/prog/

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 18:03

>>40
Will it take off? Who knows! Probably not.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 18:51

>>39
Me too. Why does every petty tyrant local to here and /q/ hate us?

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 18:59

>>24
Any person who, in a circumstance described in subsection (d), knowingly produces, distributes, receives, or possesses with intent to distribute, a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting
Text isn't a visual depiction.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 19:04

>>40
Oh wow, make a thread that gets blocked by the spam filter, and it creates the thread, sans content, anyway. What a piece of shit.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 19:08

>>43
Do you not see text?

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 19:08

>>44
Who would make a textboard with a spam filter?
Terrible!

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 19:13

>>45
Yes, after I sent the text through my spamword evasion expert system, the post went through, but there are still three threads with nothing but my title.

>>46
Well, it blocks `kike'. I'm sure we can make an educated guess about who's really doing this.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 19:17

>>43
Any JPEG image is stored as a text inside computer memory, called ASCII.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 19:18

Oh, and as far as I can tell, it ONLY blocks `kike'.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 19:22

>>45
(f) Definitions.— For purposes of this section—
 (1) the term “visual depiction” includes undeveloped film and videotape, and data stored on a computer disk or by electronic means which is capable of conversion into a visual image, and also includes any photograph, film, video, picture, digital image or picture, computer image or picture, or computer generated image or picture, whether made or produced by electronic, mechanical, or other means;
 (2) the term “sexually explicit conduct” has the meaning given the term in section 2256 (2)(A) or 2256 (2)(B); and
 (3) the term “graphic”, when used with respect to a depiction of sexually explicit conduct, means that a viewer can observe any part of the genitals or pubic area of any depicted person or animal during any part of the time that the sexually explicit conduct is being depicted.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 19:29

>>50
Okay, okay !

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 19:37

>>47,49
probably someone who hates your retarded goyish guts

Name: kike 2012-10-02 19:48

kike

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 20:42

kike

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 20:50

LOLIES

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 20:52

Imageboard thugs can harass actual little girls for months but we ``mere goyim'' can't even have an intelligent conversation about loli and pedophilia. The mods sure have their priorities straight!

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 20:52

LOLI LOLI LOLI LOLI LOLI LOLI LOLI LOLI LOLI LOLI LOLI LOLI LOLI LOLI LOLI LOLI LOLI LOLI LOLI LOLI LOLI LOLI LOLI LOLI LOLI LOLI LOLI

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 21:04

Why haven't the imageboards been shut down yet? It's because Mootberg sells suspect IP addresses to the FBI.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 21:11

>>58
He does indeed. 4chan is an FBI front, and due to agency budget cuts and a lack of slush funds, moot was forced by his handler to sell Passes to fund the operation.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 21:54

>>50
Rasterized text is a computer generated image.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 21:58

>>44
Fixed.

>>47,49
It doesn't only block ``kike" (and doesn't always block ``kike", either). The filter list contains a horrible monstrosity of a regex that is apparently smarter than the Jewspam bot.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 22:11

LOLI LOLI LOLI LOLI LOLI LOLI LOLI LOLI LOLI LOLI LOLI LOLI LOLI LOLI LOLI LOLI LOLI LOLI LOLI LOLI LOLI LOLI LOLI LOLI LOLI LOLI LOLI

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 22:12

LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~LOLI~

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 22:13

why do you bully loli?

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 22:39

Oh /prog/riders! You do not know how great it feels to finally be honest with my family, friends, and self! I came out of the closet today and it feels great to no longer be living a dark life of lies.

My family and friends were not so happy, however, as they denounced me and shit. I’m sure they will come around though. There are millions of people like me and we become more and more accepted every day.

So, how many other Anons are pedophiles as well?

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 22:44

>>65
r u retarded?

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 22:54

>>65
Old kopipe. I saw this on /b/ like 5 years ago. Just get out.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 22:58

>>67
Go back to /b/.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 23:08

>>56
intelligent conversation about loli and pedophilia
How come whenever pedos talk about loli and pedophilia, they always consider it an ``intelligent'' conversation?

``Oh, this person gave some half assed reasoning as to why CP and pedophilia are good. Since I agree with that regardless of reasoning, and don't really understand the reasoning anyway, I'm just going to assume he's smart and that his reasoning is brilliant.''

Just because you can have a circle jerk about CP and everybody's in agreement that you should be able to fap to it doesn't make it an intelligent conversation, nor are you intelligent enough to ever take part in one.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 23:19

>>69
Back to /q/, faggot! You have no idea what you are talking about in regards to what was discussed in the last thread.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 23:20

>>65
reporting in

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-03 0:13

>>65
It's funny because it seems like you are just another gay, but after the other faggots start to sympathize with you, you reveal that you are a pedo. Well played, sir, well played. I'll give you a 9/10, so you still have room for improvement.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-03 11:37

>>72
Gays love little boys.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-03 11:42

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-03 12:48

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-04 3:24

Lilies! I love flowers!

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-04 15:59

LOLIES

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List