Bootstrapping interpreter
1
Name:
Anonymous
2012-09-30 13:55
Say you've implemented language X in environment Y, and then written an X interpreter in X.
2
Name:
Anonymous 2012-09-30 13:57
compile x interpreter with x
3
Name:
Anonymous 2012-09-30 14:02
>>2
There is no X compiler.
4
Name:
Anonymous 2012-09-30 14:05
You can't. You are literally asking how do you make a high level language in a high level language with compiling to assembly.
5
Name:
Anonymous 2012-09-30 14:05
6
Name:
Anonymous 2012-09-30 14:07
>>4
Yeah, heh... trolling...
7
Name:
Anonymous 2012-09-30 14:33
>>1
Port X in Y to X in X. Fin.
8
Name:
Anonymous
2012-09-30 16:27
>>1
Port X to Windows 8 and eat a big box of rusty nails
9
Name:
Anonymous
2012-09-30 16:53
*BANG* *BANG* *BANG* *BANG* X *BANG* *BANG* *BANG* *BANG* Y *BANG* *BANG* *BANG* *BANG* *BANG* *BANG* Pass *BANG* *BANG* the *BANG* *BANG* *BANG* chainsaw *BANG* *BANG* *BANG* *REWWWWWWWWWERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR* X *BANG* *BANG* *BANG* *BANG* *BANG* *BANG* Y *BANG* *BANG* *BANG* *BANG* PROFIT
10
Name:
Anonymous 2012-09-30 17:38
PON PON WEI WEI WEI PON PON PON WEI PON WEI PON
11
Name:
Anonymous
2012-09-30 21:53
reflections on trusting trust
12
Name:
Anonymous
2012-09-30 21:57
Sure, Y is removed from the equation, but is it removed from the equation like Sussman was by Abelson?