Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Lisp vs C++

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-27 17:10

- Lisp is crap
- C++ is not crap

Conclusion: C++ is better.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-27 17:16

unless you are looking for crap

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-27 17:23

A good load of manure can be very fertile.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-27 18:49

>>3
I wouldn't want to have children with a shit.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-27 20:16

C++ is going to be made obsolete by D. D is going to shift the programming style toward languages like Scala and Ruby. C++ is a dead language that people do not know is dead yet

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-27 21:14

>>5
http://dlang.org/garbage.html
D is a fully garbage collected language.

fuck off

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-28 0:24

D

GC is shit.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-28 0:26

>>5
Like all GC languages, D will be a magnet for incompetent programmers.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-28 0:47

>>6
>>7
benchmarks dont lie
>>8
thats a half truth, it does take a lot of skill to program in C/C++, but its a wasted skill as the compiler can do most of that work for you

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-28 1:19

>>9


jmp 0x00/g/ ;; please

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-28 1:21

>>10

fuck off you idiotic sack of feces.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-28 1:34

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-28 5:42

>>9
but its a wasted skill as the compiler can do most of that work for you
But with GC, it is runtime that does the work for you. That harms the user experience, since your program will be slow as hell.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-28 6:06

>>13
You don't even need to "waste skill". Just wrap all your dynamic memory usage to classes in C++ and it's very safe, very fast, and very easy to understand. Destructor handles freeing the memoy.

Allocate from stack most of the times, and wrap your wild pointers with unique_ptr or shared_ptr/weak_ptr, and you'll be very safe with minimum manual effort required.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-28 6:17

C++ a shit

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-28 7:58

C++11 has shared pointers

they are like garbage collection

should change name to GC++

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-28 8:25

>>16
That would imply it's one better than GC.
C++ is at most 0 better than anything. C was INT_MAX before Bjarne Stringstream re-evaluated it.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-28 8:45

C was INT_MAX
LOL, C is even worse than C++.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-28 9:03

>>18
Hello, Gosling.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List