Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

numbers dont exist

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-25 23:20

have you ever seen a "number"? neither have i. therefore they don't exist.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-26 0:11

Here's one: 1

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-26 0:48

have you seen the jew spammer's brain? neither have i. therefore it doesn't exist.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-26 3:29

>>1
Nobody ever said it existed. Mathematics are a concept.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-26 3:31

I have seen numerals, which are not numbers themselves but are signs of things unseen. They are symbols which participate in the form of the number.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-26 4:47

numbers are like niggers
there are too any of them

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-26 7:47

Jewish zionist infinitary set theory Java:

public class One {
   public static void main(String args[]) {
      int one = 1;
   }
}


Good halal ``in Lisp'' according to the Prophet Muhammad (peace be unto him):
1


[spoiler]Kill this thread you idiots, this is like candy for the antisemitic spammer[/spammer]

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-26 11:33

>>1
I did: 123 is a number.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-26 11:36

>>8
No, it's three numbers.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-26 11:39

>>9
three digits, which form a number.

form IS content; code IS data.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-26 11:42

>>7
Shalom!

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-26 11:44

no digits:

no number.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-26 12:11

I've never seen a Monad

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-26 12:16

You are a solipsist.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-26 12:38

>>14
code is data = solipsism?

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-26 15:21

some numbers that exists:
phi
pi
e

the funny thing is that they can't be exactly defined as exactly defined numbers.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-26 15:27

>>16
They're well defined. What makes you think they're undefined? Because they're irrational?

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-26 15:43

So many trolls.
So little sunlight.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-26 16:45

>>17
they are defined as numbers that can't be defined completely as quantities; we only have approximations. maybe we should use numerical systems based on trascendental 'numbers'.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-26 16:51

>>19
We have exact equations to compute them, your shitty computer just can't handle it.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-26 16:56

>>19
You're a fool.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-26 16:57

>>16
I thought exact values where numbers, and therefor didn't exists ?

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-26 17:01

>>4
Nobody says God exist: it's a concept!

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-26 17:06

ever seen "pi"? neither have i. therefore it doesn't exist.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-26 17:11

So who here has seen the other side of the moon?
I bet the moon is hemispherical.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-26 17:19

>>19
Numbers don't have to represent ``quantities''. Temperature isn't a quantity, but you can still measure it and make calculations based on that measurement. You could invent your own temperature system where sqrt 2 is the freezing point and pi is the boiling point. Your calculations won't round out nicely on paper but they'd be every bit as valid as if you used celsius or fahrenheit. The numbers we use are arbitrary. We base measurements on integers because they're convenient. We use base-10 so we can count the digits on our fingers. We use binary in computing because it's easy to represent with electronic signals. They're all arbitrary. Base-e occurs in nature, hence the natural logarithm, it's not arbitrary at all. Neither are pi and phi, they're real ratios that occur frequently in nature, every bit as real as 1/2 or even 1. You can have pi apples just as easily as you can have 1/2 an apple. 1/2 is abstract in it's own sense. Nothing in the physical world is ever exactly one half. You can halve an apple but those halves aren't exactly equivalent. You can have half a dollar, but that's just an arbitrary value we attach to it. We could have just as easily called it pi dollars. 1/2 is real to you because it's such a common part of your vocabulary, but in the grand scheme of the universe it's no more or less real or relevant as any irrational number.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-26 17:21

>>26
Shalom, hymie!

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-26 18:04

>>27
I'm not even circumcised, Omar. I'd tell you to kill yourself, but you're probably planning to blow yourself up already. Allah akbar!

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-26 18:11

>>28
I'm not even circumcised
In France, I’m Russian, and in Russia, I’m a Jew. In France, a Jew is someone who wears a yarmulke, goes to synagogue. If you don’t do these things, you are some other kind of person. But I’ll tell you: My social circle in France, the people I hang out with, is becoming more and more Jewish. There’s some kind of self-selection going on. You gravitate to your own. -- Pavel Lungin, Russian-Jewish filmmaker

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-26 18:56

>>26
Yes, I'd like to purchase 2pi bananas, please.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-26 20:48

"what good is your proof, when irrational numbers do not even exist?" --kronecker on proof of trascendence of pi

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List