/prog/ - GvR van Rossum a feminist

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-21 21:11

I AM A FEMINIST. There. I stood on a chair and I said it. If you wonder why, read Caitlin Moran's excellent new feminist manifesto (http://www.amazon.com/How-Be-Woman-Caitlin-Moran/dp/0062124293).

https://plus.google.com/115212051037621986145/posts/7KeWUg8oBJD

Name: FFP 2012-09-21 21:55

excellent! he better watch his male programmer privilege!

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-21 22:01

Of course he is. How do you think he came up with the Forced Indentation Of Code? Obviously his dominatrix suggested it to him.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-21 22:06

GVR confirmed for jew.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-21 22:21

That's the last straw. FIOC is dead to me, you hear?! Dead!!!

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 4:20

Guido looks at least 1/2 Jewish, works at Google and now he is a commie (feminism is a commie movement, if you dont know).

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 4:53

And I mean, come on, he's dutch...

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 9:54

GvR confirmed for retard. Fukcing FIOCista BDFL.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 10:11

Sure is Reddit in here.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 10:41

>>9
It wasn't until you came.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 10:45

>>9
Oh look at me! I'm not a redditor guise!

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 10:48

w

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 15:02

>>11
It's true. I'm not a misogynist neckbeard who thinks ``feminist'' is a dirty word. And it's because that's such a rare stance in our fucking community that Gweedo felt the need to come out in favor of feminism.
If you want to whine about feeemales and how you can never get a date, go do it on /r/programming.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 16:52

>>13
You don't understand ~~yiddish subversionism of gentile cultural values~~ feminism, and you don't understand /prog/.
Go back to /r/jidf/.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 18:00

Dear /prog/,

Look what happens when you start mocking those brainwashed retards that call themselves feminists: >>13

This shit is probably a permanent addition to /prog/ now, are you happy with yourselves?

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 18:05

>>15
I don't mind. I do find your lack of spoiler tags around /prog/ disturbing and offensive, though. Just because /prog/ can't cast people off doesn't mean you're welcome here.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 18:42

>>16
Terrible!

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 18:54

>>17
I don't see any dead dogs around.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 18:56

Fucking guido. Caitlin Moran is a moran.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 19:24

>>13
For fucks sake, /r/programming is the only decent part of Reddit left. Keep the Reddit drama within Reddit, preferably on one of the dedicated subreddits.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 19:24

our COMMUNITY

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 19:25

>>20
/r/programming is what /pr/ used to be. If you think it's decent, you don't belong anywhere on the Internet.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 19:29

>>22
Not enough loli amirite?

Also, sweet dubz, bro.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 19:48

>>23
Why are you defending a subreddit, scum?

/r/programming is about Javashit and le cloud/startups. Last time I went there, it felt like Hacker News lite.

If it's so great, why don't you go the fuck back there?

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 20:04

>>24
Some misguided sentimental attachment to this shitty place, and amazement at how much less shitty it is than how I always knew it (i.e. since a little before Frozen Void stormed the place). Also, only here can one shitpost freely, pseudo Xarnite. So hax my anus and fuck off, ``faggot''.

>>33
Nice dubz.

That, by the way, does not make for a good programming forum on itself, before you trot out some stupid fucking argument about how free-for-all anonymity makes for superior discussion liberated by the trappings of reputation. Nobody should say that shit anymore after /prog/ rotted away completely late last year.

Besides, the obnoxious pseudo hipsterism of Node, Ruby, etc. is the least of the content these days, and the useless ``methodology'' posts fall off the frontpage quickly. Amid all that crap you find genuinely good posters like the academic-in-industry guy who knows all about Agda, Haskell and category/type-theory, or the old lispers with books to their names. Those are rare, though, but at least you find them regularly, unlike, say, here.

Hacker News, on the other hand, is a frozen void of actual technical discussion.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 20:32

Also, only here can one shitpost freely, pseudo Xarnite.
Xarn actually likes shitposting.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-23 4:31

after /prog/ rotted away completely late last year.
You don't understand /prog/ and you need to go back to the /r/leprogramming that you love so dearly, ``thanks''!

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-23 6:43

>>27
Whatever you say, ``oldfag''.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-23 7:14

Nobody ``understands /prog/'' and you should all just ~~shut the fuck up~~reflect on the subject. /prog/'s content is always at its best when the people here muster enough willpower to not troll themselves by arguing with shitposts (notice how I didn't say ``arguing with shitposters'': shitposts are a distributed entity that is carried on by potentially all /prog/ posters). It's then that we have a healthy balance between the interesting content and (at times funny) shitposts. It also helps when everybody here silently agrees not to flood the place with shit.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-23 16:06

>>25
Amid all that crap you find genuinely good posters like the academic-in-industry guy who knows all about Agda, Haskell and category/type-theory, or the old lispers with books to their names.

This is true. One of my very first posts on Hacker News was something critical of Randal Schwartz, who actually replied and managed to start a nice little flame war with me.

What strikes me about /r/programming is even though you have hipster Macfag Steve Jobs-wannabe ``Ruby hackers'', they actually prove themselves to be competent programmers who actually build things that others actually want to use. The only thing that has come out of /prog/ is /prog/scrape, which is actually inferior to my own CLI /prog/ browser. I've tried sharing my code here, but everybody seems to be struggling with their CS101 SEPPLES homework too much to understand any real, working code.

Not to say there aren't smart people on /prog/. There are. I just have a certain level of respect for people who actually get things done.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-23 16:10

>>30
I've tried sharing my code here
Try harder.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-23 16:20

>>30
The only thing that has come out of /prog/ is /prog/scrape, which is actually inferior to my own CLI /prog/ browser.
You could share your custom /prog/ and let us be the judges of that.

Name: >>32 2012-09-23 16:29

*/prog/ browser

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-23 16:31

>>32-33
It's not finished. I've just clacked some Lisp functions to parse Shi^tchan's output. I still need to retrieve pages with wget. I will release it under a MIT Licence when I'm done though.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-23 16:50

>>34
My program is written in C, not Lisp, though rewriting it in Lisp sounds fun.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-23 17:29

>>35
How about both? Write it in C, but preprocess it using Lisp macros.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-23 18:51

>>36
Terrible!

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-27 1:06

neckbeard who thinks ``feminist'' is a dirty word
Except that it is, and radical jew feminists did that to feminism, so if you want to support womens' fight for voting rights call it some other name from now on.
I am not opposed to equal opportunities for women (equal meaning equal, not quota-based), I am opposed to woman-centric universe made of lies, tyranny, paranoia and annoying loudmouth ugly bitches without sex life.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-27 1:06

From that thread
Patriarchy is a bad thing because people are not equally represented at the highest levels of society, but it's also a subtle barrier for women in our daily lives. If there were more women leaders in the world, do you think there would be as much war?
What a fucking cunt

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-27 1:09

>>36
Use GNU m4

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-27 1:31

>>39
If there were more women leaders in the world, do you think there would be as much war?
No, there would be a lot more of it.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-27 3:15

If it's solely in the name of justice and equality, why don't you invite all third-world people to live in first-world countries? Why not just do away with border lines all together? Why stop at women, in first-world countries no less?

This speaking as a person living in a third-world country myself.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-27 3:28

GvR van Rossum
Guido van Rossum^{van Rossum^{van Rossum^{van Rossum^{van Rossum^{van Rossum^{van Rossum^{van Rossum^{van Rossum^{van Rossum^{van Rossum^{van Rossum^{van Rossum^{van Rossum^...}}}}}}}}}}}}}

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-27 3:33

>>43
thanks for the laugh m8

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-27 4:43

>>41
If there were more women leaders in the world, do you think there would be as much war?
No, there would be a lot more of it.
- You bitch, I bought that island first!
- Well I have slept with your prime minister!

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-27 4:48

>>45
-Well I forced the indentation of your code!

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-27 9:59

>>> from __future__ import patriarchy

  File "<stdin>", line 1

SyntaxError: the future belongs to wymminkind

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-27 12:08

SURE IS /prague/ IN HERE!

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-29 12:35

>man
>feminist
>choose one

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-29 12:36

>>49
Learn how to quote before you come here to shitpost, reddit/g/-kun.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-29 13:55

Gender is unscientific and ultimately destructive.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-29 15:27

>>51
Fuck you, gender feminist

GvR van Rossum a feminist

1 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-21 21:11

2 Name: FFP 2012-09-21 21:55

3 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-21 22:01

4 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-21 22:06

5 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-21 22:21

6 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 4:20

7 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 4:53

8 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 9:54

9 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 10:11

10 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 10:41

11 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 10:45

12 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 10:48

13 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 15:02

14 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 16:52

15 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 18:00

16 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 18:05

17 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 18:42

18 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 18:54

19 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 18:56

20 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 19:24

21 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 19:24

22 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 19:25

23 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 19:29

24 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 19:48

25 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 20:04

26 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 20:32

27 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-23 4:31

28 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-23 6:43

29 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-23 7:14

30 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-23 16:06

31 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-23 16:10

32 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-23 16:20

33 Name: >>32 2012-09-23 16:29

34 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-23 16:31

35 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-23 16:50

36 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-23 17:29

37 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-23 18:51

38 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-27 1:06

39 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-27 1:06

40 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-27 1:09

41 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-27 1:31

42 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-27 3:15

43 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-27 3:28

44 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-27 3:33

45 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-27 4:43

46 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-27 4:48

47 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-27 9:59

48 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-27 12:08

49 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-29 12:35

50 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-29 12:36

51 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-29 13:55

52 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-29 15:27

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-21 21:11

Name: FFP 2012-09-21 21:55

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-21 22:01

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-21 22:06

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-21 22:21

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 4:20

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 4:53

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 9:54

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 10:11

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 10:41

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 10:45

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 10:48

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 15:02

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 16:52

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 18:00

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 18:05

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 18:42

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 18:54

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 18:56

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 19:24

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 19:24

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 19:25

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 19:29

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 19:48

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 20:04

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-22 20:32

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-23 4:31

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-23 6:43

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-23 7:14

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-23 16:06

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-23 16:10

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-23 16:20

Name: >>32 2012-09-23 16:29

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-23 16:31

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-23 16:50

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-23 17:29

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-23 18:51

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-27 1:06

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-27 1:06

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-27 1:09

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-27 1:31

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-27 3:15

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-27 3:28

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-27 3:33

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-27 4:43

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-27 4:48

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-27 9:59

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-27 12:08

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-29 12:35

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-29 12:36

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-29 13:55

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-29 15:27