Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Java's Crypt

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-21 12:24

Javascript is surprisingly quirky for such a hyped language.  Even Python has less quirks.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-24 6:31

You're giving Jews too much credit.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-24 6:36

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-24 6:37

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-24 6:39

>>42
army service evasion
Typical cowardly kike.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-24 6:40

>>41
You dont have to give Jews anything, they take it themselves.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-24 6:41

>>44
Blacksmith. Typical non kike.
On his mother side: farmers.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-24 6:42

Here is an article in Russian, where the Jews themselves admit they are biologically different and have much higher IQ than us, goyim:
http://www.sem40.ru/rest/interesting/19053/

so there is nothing wrong with genociding the Jews, because they are different species.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-24 6:44

>>46
On his mother side: farmers.
Probably mass produced alcohol, using goyim labor. Jews love alcohol, because it helps them to expand usury practice by selling it on credit.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-24 6:52

>>47
You're a fucking mixed abortion of Caucasian Hazar Tatar Scyth Mongol and what not. And you're a muslim.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-24 6:52

>>23
Semicolons ... Go

HAHAHA

One caveat. You should never put the opening brace of a
control structure (if, for, switch, or select) on the next
line. If you do, a semicolon will be inserted before the
brace, which could cause unwanted effects. Write them like this

if i < f() {
    g()
}

not like this

if i < f()  // wrong!
{           // wrong!
    g()
}

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-24 7:04

>>49
Shalom!

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-24 9:08

>>49
Mad kike is mad.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-24 11:23

>>50
JavaScript doesn't actually insert a semicolon in that case. it pretty much only happens if you put return on a line by itself, and just putting a space after return is enough to stop it from doing that.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-24 11:39

>>53
I know, the code in question is Go, which has even more ridiculous rules for automatic surprise semicolonoscopy.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-24 15:16

>>1
JS isn't hyped. JS is forced.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-25 4:50

>>55
It is hyped, look at the node.js faggot crowd who claims that making it possible to develop shitty ``apps'' in one language for both client and server was the holy grail and the point of the whole computer science thing and, consequently, since node.js was shat out javascript became the best thing ever to happen to computers.  I'm not fucking kidding, they are saying exactly that.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-25 8:53

>>3
>>8
>>10
This will rustle your jimmies:
http://lispyscript.com/

But yeah, I always wanted:
Scheme for every browser. Midi included too!

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-25 9:01

>>57
Awful. No thought was put into this except a source transformation.

Name: redditor 2012-09-25 9:11

this.isSparta()

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-29 8:09

var x = new Boolean(false);
if (x) {
  alert('hi');  // Shows 'hi'.
}

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-02 4:34

As a web faggot programmer I write in both Python (the backend) and Javascript (frontend).  And I have concluded that javascript is a fucking ugly mess of pieces of donkey shit.  It had a chance to be a useful high-level language, and it blew it, completely and irreversibly.

Unlike Python which traded types (and, consequently, correctness and robustness) for being able to actually do shit and do it fast, and stuff some tricks into its sleeve along the way which would be impossible in statically typed languages, javascript did not get anything in return.  It kept the shitty C syntax and explicitness, verbosity of Java, and C++'s trademark inability to accomplish anything within a reasonable time frame.

Its ``prototypal'' inheritance is a ridiculous concept with zero actual value.  It needlessly confuses beginners and does not give anything to experienced programmers.  Nobody uses prototypes, there are no place for them in shitty DOM manipulation ajax scripts.  Or awesome scripts, for that matter, like that 1 kb game of chess.  Nobody uses prototypal inheritance other than to (incompletely) emulate Simula-style inheritance.

Do you know why it was implemented?  Because the creators of JS were too lazy and/or or incompetent to implement a real class system which had some benefits over existing ones, or at least was comparable and familiar.  Instead they shat out an ugly fucking hack consisting of fucking chained hash maps and called it ``prototypal inheritance'' and started hyping it like it is the best thing ever to hide the fact that it barely fucking works.

Javashit is the biggest PL disappointment in my career, I was expecting a magic wand and instead got an undergrad's toy, and I pity the fools who use it to write backends.  Python is a much saner choice, or Perl, or even fucking Ruby.  And yes, v8 is better than what Mozilla and IE had before it came along, but it compares poorly to real JIT runtimes like CPython, PyPy, Perl, JVM etc.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-02 4:50

>>23
The incompatibilities are overstated (i.e. are a matter of standards conformance—you can't blame JSES for that, no matter what language is being implemented, it's just as likely to happen.)
You don't support IE7 I take it?  Because I do, and about 25% of my JS programming time is devoted to make the frontend part work in IE fucking 7.  It can break in surprising ways and there are no useful debuggers for IE.

·Coercion is notoriously bad in dynamic languages.
Python coercion is not so fucking retarded.  It was designed, unlike javashit which was obviously stuffed with stubs and wired together without much thought until it stopped crashing.  There are virtually no useful coercion rules.  How about this:
js> [3] * 10
30
js> [1, 2, 3] * 10
NaN
js> [1, 2, 3] + [4, 5, 6]
"1,2,34,5,6"

Really, what the fuck?  What other language is this confused about what to do with its values?  Python gives intuitive, expected, and useful results for all three operations, and you enjoy your "[object Object][object Object][object Object][object Object]".  Fuck you and fuck javashit.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-02 5:38

>>31
Brendan Eich (inventor of JavaScript) - JEW
lel

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-02 9:03

2^6 GET

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-02 9:20

>>64
2 ^ 6 == 4.  You are not making any sense.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-02 9:34

>>64
I dunno either, I shall enjoy my doubles by 2/3.

Maibe he mena -(2 - 6)*-1

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-02 9:40

>>31
Walter Bright is the inventor of D, not Andrei Alexandrescu

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-02 9:54

>>62
Join the master race, and tell your users,

FUCK YOU. DOWNLOAD XXX BROWSER TODAY, WITH THE NEW SCHEME PLUGIN

1) Make it better, "You can not watch this site if you do not have the scheme plugin installed."
2)Look it my double. It comes with jimmies too.
3)It gives a browser experience like never before seen on your retina display.
4)I hurd u laik waffles. Hear iss a pankike sted.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-02 10:19

>>67
Bright isn't Jewish, so of no importance.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-02 11:38

>>62
not even FFOC fucks up that badly. it really only has two "unexpected" coercion cases: number -> string and string -> number, which only happen in the context of its separate concatenation and addition operators so there's no question as to what "1" + 2 or 1 .. 2 means. although, the BDFLs are considering removing these coercions anyway


>= {3} * 10 -- error: attempt to perform arithmetic on a table value
>= {1, 2, 3} * 10 -- ditto
>= {1, 2, 3} + {4, 5, 6} -- ditto


FFOC isn't even considered an OO language and yet it still has a mechanism to handle its self value.


x:dosomething(1, 2, 3)    -- translates to:
x.dosomething(x, 1, 2, 3) -- with `x' being evaluated only once.

x.dosomething(y, 1, 2, 3) -- Function.prototype.call, anyone?


needless to say, FFOCfags are not impressed by javashit in the least. it's only now getting shit like block scoping and correct handling of lexical scope.

i mean hell, they chose generators over full coroutines! they even used keywords! meanwhile i can go and cripple them on a per-function basis, since i can just write different wrappers over the coroutine library and insert them into function environments as needed.

js is the future

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-02 11:59

>>70
js is the future
FUTURE IS MERCILESS


@@@fffffff@CCfffLCfCCG@@@G@@GGGfffLCG@@@G@@@GCLLCLfLLCL@@C@@@@@@@@@@
@@@ffffff@GCLttfLLGCG@@@G@G@@GCLGGLCG@@G@@@@@GCGLLfttLLGG@@@@@@@@@@@
@@@fff@@@GGLfttfLLGCG@@@@@@@GGCL@@CCG@@@@@@@@GCGLLftlfLGG@@@@@@@@@@@
@@@@fff@@@GLftfLLCCGCGG@@@@@@CGC@@GG@@@@@@@GGCGCCLLftfLG@@G@@@@@@@@@
@@@@@ffL@@@GGLCLCG@@CCCG@@@@@@@GG@@@@@@@@@@GGC@@GGCCCCG@@@@@@@@@@@@@
@@@@G@ffG@@ffGGCff@GGfG@f@@@fL@GGff@ff@@@ff@GG@ffGGGGfff@@@fff@@@@@G
@@@Lff@ffG@ffGGCff@@ffffff@@fL@GGff@ff@@@ff@G@@ffGGGffff@@ffffC@@@G@
@G@ff@@@ff@ffGCGLf@Cff@@ffC@fLG@@ff@ff@@@ff@@@@ffG@ff@@@@Lff@@@@G@@@
G@@ff@@@ff@ffGG@Lf@ff@@@GffGfL@G@ff@ff@@@ff@@@Gff@@ff@f@@ff@fLGG@G@@
G@@ff@@@ff@ffG@@ff@ffC@@CffGff@G@ff@ff@@@ffL@@@ffG@ffG@@@ff@@@@CG@@G
@C@fffffff@CffffffCGfffffffGfffffff@Lfffffffffffff@ffffG@@ffff@@C@GG
GL@@fffff@@@ffffffGGGffffffGGffffff@@fffff@ffffGffG@ffff@@Gfff@@LGG@
CG@@@@@@@@GGGG@@LfGGG@@@@ff@GGG@@ff@@@@@@@@@@@@@Lf@G@@@@@@@@@@@@GC@G
L@@@G@@@@@@C@@G@ff@GGGG@LfL@@@@@@ff@@G@@@@@G@@G@@G@CGGG@@@@@@G@@@LGC
G@@@@@GG@@@GGfffff@GGGffffG@@GffffG@@@@@G@@G@@GGGGGLGCG@@@GG@@@@@GCC
G@@@LfLLL@@@C@fffGGGG@fffGCG@CfffG@@@@@@@@@@G@GGCCGLGL@@@LLLfL@@@GCC
@G@CtCft@G@@CGGGG@CCCC@@GGtCCGG@@@GG@@@@CG@G@GGGGCLGCL@@G@ttCfC@G@CG
@G@Gfl;ft@@GGLCCGCLCCCGGGCGtLG@@@@@CG@@@GGGG@@G@GGCCf@G@@tf;lfG@G@GG
@G@ffCGLL@@GGfLLCLCCGGGCG@@@@CtttfC@@@@G@GCCG@G@GCLLf@@@@LLGCff@G@C@
@G@CfLGGC@@CGC@CLLfCCGCCCC@ltCLLLCGCC@G@@GLLG@@@LfC@C@C@@CGGLfC@G@@@
@G@GCCCGG@@GLCLCCG@CtGGGCCLG,LCffLCCCGCCCC@G@@@@@CCLCLG@@GGCCCG@G@@G
CG@GLLCGC@@GGtiLffLLCLfG@G@tftLfLLfLCCG@@@CfLCLLfff;tGG@@CGCLLG@GC@@
@@@CCL@@G@@GtfCCCCCCCGG@@@LfLfLfttfftCCG@@@CGLGCCCCCftG@@G@GLCC@@@@G
L@G@CC@G@@ifLCLLLLLCG@G@GGftfftl;lltLfCGGC@GGGCLLLLLCLfi@@G@CC@G@LG@
CfG@LGC@@fltfLfLfLftLCG@@GfLLti:;;iltLLG@@@GCLffLfLtLfttf@@CGL@GfC@@
@G@@@GGGGfCfCtfliilfLLCC@@CLLli;,,illLLG@@CCLLfllilftCfCfGGG@@@@G@@@
CG@CC@@@@GfLLLllii;itLLG@GGLLtl;,:;iiLLG@@GLLt;;iillLLffGG@@@CC@GC@@
@G@C@@@GfC@GCL;i;,:ilffCGGGCtLli;;;;ittG@GCffli:,;iiLCC@CfG@@@G@@@@@
@@GG@@fftfCGCL;i;,,iitCCCGGCLfftli;:fLC@@CCCtl;,,;i;LCGCftff@@GG@@@@
@@GG@@LftffGLCt:i;;iitLCCG@GGCfLLfLf;CG@@GCLtii;;i:tLLGfftfL@@GG@@@@
@@@C@@@GCCtL@fCL;litlffLGCGCLGCCfttCCGGCCGLffltil:LCf@LtGLC@@@C@@@@@
GGG@@@@GCCftLGLCLLffLfCGGGCLGGCLLLLCGGCG@GCCfLftLLCLGLttCLG@@@@GGG@@
@GC@@@@C@GCttL@LCLLLLCLGGCfGLCGCfCGGLG@@GGGLCLLLLCL@LtfCCGC@@@@CG@@G
@@GC@C@fG@@LfLCLGffLLG@CtLGftGGCCCGGCC@@GCC@GLLffGLCLfL@@Cf@C@CG@@GG
@@@Ct@@fCG@@fLfCLG@@CCCLtCGlGGGGGCGCCGC@GC@C@C@@GLCLLl@GLLf@@fC@G@GL
@@@@CCtLt@@@GfC@CGGCfCGGt@@Ct@@Lt@@L@@L@G@G@GGGCCLLCtGGGCtLtCC@@@@LC
G@G@GtlLfC@G@fGfGGGGL;C@iC@LLG@CfG@@G@CC@@GCC@GtCGfGf@G@LfLlt@@G@GCG
G@@C@ttfCGGG@@Lf@@fCfiG@LL@CCG@@f@@CC@fLGCCG@GLf@@tL@@GGGLftt@C@@GGG
f@@@CftLLtC@@CLGG@f@ClC@CL@@LG@GtG@CC@LC@CC@l@@f@CGLC@@ClLLtfC@@@fGG
l@@@@CltLlGG@@@G@@t@@f@@GG@@LC@@fC@@C@CG@@@Ct@@t@@C@@@CGlLtlC@@@@lGC
LG@G@@ftflGL@@@C@@GG@CG@@@@@@G@@CL@@C@G@@@@Lf@@G@@C@@@fGlftf@@G@@fCC
fG@@C@CfttCfG@@t@@@L@@L@@@@@@@@@CG@@C@@@@@@f@@L@@@t@@GfCttfC@C@@GLCG
Li@@@C@LttLLG@@G@@@@@@f@@@@@@@@@CG@@C@@@@@@l@@@@@@G@@CLLttL@CG@@iLGC
LfG@@G@@ftLCC@@@@@@@@@f@@@@@@@@@CG@@G@@@@@@t@@@@@@@@@LCLff@@G@@GfLCL
CC@@@CL@Lt@GL@@@C@@@@@f@@G@@@@@@CG@@G@@@@@@f@@@@@C@@@LG@tL@LC@@@CCLf
CLfGCC@GGtCGL@@@@@@@@@L@@G@@@@@@LG@@G@@@@@@L@@@@@@@@@LGCtGG@CCGfLCff
GCLC@@GG@CCfLGC@@G@@G@G@@G@@@@@@G@@@G@@@@@@G@G@@@@@CGLfCC@CG@@CLCGfL
CGff@@CC@CCCCGL@@@G@@@@@@@@@@@@@G@@@C@@@@@@@@G@G@@@LGCCCC@CC@@tfGCLL
CGffC@C@@@LCCLG@@@@GG@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@C@@@@@@@@GG@@@@GfCCL@@@C@CffGCLC
CLLLfGGG@GL@LfC@@@@@L@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@C@@@@@@@@L@@@@@CfL@LG@GGGfLCLCCf
CCLCfC@GGGGCLfCG@GG@C@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@L@@@@@@@@C@GG@GCffCGG@@@CfCLCCLC
GGLGLLG@@@@GtGCC@fC@G@@@@@@@@@G@@@@@C@@@@@@@@G@Cf@CCCtG@@@@GLLGLGCC@
CGLGCLfL@@LGLfLL@fC@fL@@@L@@@@tGG@@@L@@@L@@@Lf@Cf@fLffGf@@LLLCGLGG@@
LGCCCLCCL@C@CftlGfC@lG@GfL@@C@tCG@@@fG@@LfC@Gt@CfGlttCGC@LCCCCCCGL@@
GGCCCCCGffCf@lGlfLC@tG@@fL@@C@LG@@@@fC@@Lf@@Ct@CLflGlCfCLLGCCCCCGG@@
@LCCGCGGGG@LCGttlCC@fC@@fL@@G@CCL@@GLG@@Lf@@Cf@CClttCfL@CGGGCCCCL@@@
@CGGCGCLG@@GLLGLf@G@G@@CC@@@C@@@G@@@CC@@@CC@@G@G@fLGfL@@@GLCGCGGC@@@
GGCCC@GGG@@@GiGGLCGGCCGGGCG@G@@@@@@LG@GGCG@GCCGGGLGGiG@@@GGG@CCCG@@L
CCfGGG@@@@@@@@@@fGG@@GGGG@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@GGGG@@GGf@@@@@@@@@@GGGfGCCL
LGfff@fGfff@ffffffffffLGffff@@ff@ff@ff@@@ffff@Gfffff@fff@ff@GfffL@fG
GLfff@ffffLCffffffffff@fffCff@ff@ff@ff@@ffff@C@fffff@ffL@ff@fffLffGG
CGfffGffff@ffL@@fff@CL@ff@@ffGff@ff@ff@@ffffGG@ff@ff@ffffffff@@@ffG@
Gfffffffff@GfL@@ffL@CfGffC@ffGfL@Gf@ff@@ffGff@Gff@ff@fffffffff@@ff@@
GffLffffffLLfffffLf@ff@ffffff@Gfffffff@fffLff@fffLffCff@@ff@ffffff@G
CffffGffffLGfffff@f@ff@@ffff@@fffffGff@ff@@fCCffffffLff@@ffGCffffGGG
GGG@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ff@@@@@@@@ff@@ffC@@@@@G@@@GGGGGG
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@G@@@@@GGGG

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-02 14:05

javascript is the best language I have ever worked with for the sole reason that it doesn't have classes. It forces you to do functional programming because if you don't your code will be a mess. 

yes I know they are adding classes in ec6, but they are the most minimal kind of classes, essentially just sugar on prototypes.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-02 14:32

>>72
javascript is the best language I have ever worked with for the sole reason that it doesn't have classes.
I'm dumbstruck by the sheer amount of Reddit in this post.

It's so retarded I... uh. It won't be easy to recover from this brain damage I just got by reading that post.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-02 14:50

DUBZ

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-02 14:51

>>74
that was a bit premature.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-03 15:03

>>73
Reddittards think that it is functional programming if you program with functions only (as opposed to classes with methods)

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-03 16:06

javascript only has closures because it can't into block scoping

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-03 16:08

>>72
Jesus FUCK I hope this guy's a troll.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-03 22:52

>>76
Reddittards think that it is functional programming if you program with functions only
I laughed pretty fucking hard.

>>78
I'm seriously starting to doubt it. The Javascript troll has been here for the last few months, but he doesn't seem to be a troll anymore. Looks like he's completely serious about that.

Fucking Poe's Law.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-03 22:59

>>79
It's always like that: first someone makes a joke, then that joke becomes a meme, and finally new people don't realise it was ever a joke.
The curse of anonymous BBSes.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List