C++

I'm a profficent in C and I have a couple free weeks, is C++ worth the effort? I intend to write a small game for my daughter and I think writing it in C++, with OpenGl, at the same pace I learn would be fun and since, as I said above, I have experience in C ,so, would it require much effort?

Give me a good answer, please, I'd rather not go through over 20 posts of "sepples a shit."

it has nothing on javascript

ask margaret rouse

she speaks fluent Geek, Biz-speak, Cloud, SAPanese, VAR, BI/BA, Storage, Security, Agile, Networking, SEO and marketing. she spends her days translating these highly specialized languages into plain English.

 http://whatis.techtarget.com/contributor/Margaret-Rouse

C++ is a massive language with many powerful features but is too obtuse for my opinion. The way I learned is to buy a C++ reference book to study and extend projects written in C++. Given what I know today, I wouldn't start new projects in C++ if the audience for the code was only myself. If there were more people, then it might be worth the effort of using it. For me, I would use only a subset of the language's features and document that as part of the project's standards.

implying you will get 20 responses.

I am not sure I would learn Cpp if I already knew C. I am learning Cpp and it's awesome and you can solve problems via a standard way instead of hacking around. That is only my impression and opinion based not on experience but rather from what I hear. Everything you can do in Cpp, you can do in C.

>>5
The C preprocessor is part of C.

smartass. I am on my mobile and didn't want to press those extra buttons, so used 'p' instead of '+'.

smartassf I am on my mobile and didnat want to press those extra buttonsc so used qpq instead of q+qf

C++ is a good language for games, nothing else. Video games are the only area I can think of that can benefit from OOP and still needs decent performance.

Application programmers won't touch it. Kernel and embedded programmers won't touch it. (For good reason on both counts. Sepples is useless and should be abandoned.

We can then extend this to an equality-style relation. Two sets X and Y are said to have the same cardinality if there exists a bijection between X and Y. By the Schroeder-Bernstein theorem, this is equivalent to there being both a one-to-one mapping from X to Y and a one-to-one mapping from Y to X. We then write |X| = |Y|. The cardinal number of X itself is often defined as the least ordinal a with |a| = |X|. This is called the von Neumann cardinal assignment; for this definition to make sense, it must be proved that every set has the same cardinality as some ordinal; this statement is the well-ordering principle. It is however possible to discuss the relative cardinality of sets without explicitly assigning names to objects.

The earliest recorded idea of infinity comes from Anaximander, a pre-Socratic Greek philosopher who lived in Miletus. He used the word apeiron which means infinite or limitless.

If, on the other hand, the universe were not curved like a sphere but had a flat topology, it could be both unbounded and infinite. The curvature of the universe can be measured through multipole moments in the spectrum of the cosmic background radiation.

An enrichment of ZFC called Internal Set Theory was proposed by Edward Nelson in 1977.

In mathematics, the axiom of choice, or AC, is an axiom of set theory equivalent to the statement that "the product of a collection of non-empty sets is non-empty". More explicitly, it states that for every indexed family (S_i)_{i \in I} of nonempty sets there exists an indexed family (x_i)_{i \in I} of elements such that x_i \in S_i for every i \in I.