/prog/ - remote administration

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 13:35

I often find myself doing Linux tech support for various friends; since I'm behind a NAT and so are they, I can't directly ssh to their computers. I've had many ideas, such as tunnelling TCP over XMPP, or TCP over IRC (although I'm not sure what network would let me get away with this). Any better ideas?

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 14:31

hamachi

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 15:58

Would be a lot easier if you guys were using Windows. Keep Linux for servers.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 16:03

>>3
>2012
>using wintendo
omg i literally peed my pants. /g/entooman here...ur so wrong go suck a micro$ack u fucking child. i bet u like ur freedom pounded out of ur ass by a hug cock cuz ur a fag get it. nigger!

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 17:01

tor hidden services.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 19:00

Learn to fuvking port forward . Use a non standard port extrenally . Set it up once , then ssh in at your leasure .

Or just use screen sharing ... AMmyy is a tolerable free one

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 20:12

>>2
Nonfree.

>>3
Fuck off, freedom hater.

>>5
Interesting, I'll look into this.

>>6
I'm behind a really terrible NAT.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 20:27

>>7
You don't have the freedom to open a port?

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 20:36

>>8
What am I going to do, go ask the neighbours to buy a better router?

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 20:48

>>9
No, buy the better router yourself and install it. People who put up with a router that doesn't allow port forwarding aren't likely to notice a new router.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 20:58

>>9
You don't have your own access to Internet? Man, that sucks, speak about freedom.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 21:17

http://www.howtoforge.com/reverse-ssh-tunneling

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 21:17

>>7
Nonfree.
crack it. we are all pirates here.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 21:22

>>11
Most people dont. Having a real non-shared/NATed IP isnt cheap and many ISPs wont even offer it.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 21:25

>>14
Every ISP within a thousand miles of where I live will give you a non-shared IP, and they're all complete shit (no download bandwidth higher than 15Mbps, no upload higher than 1Mbps).

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 21:27

>>14
For example, my ISP asks additional $10/month for a real ip (i.e. the one required for VPN).

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 21:29

>>15
Not in Russia.

The single Moscow ISP charges money for real IP: http://www.mts.ru/internet/mobil_inet_and_tv/internet_comp/archive/real_ip/

Name: rms 2012-09-10 21:35

>>13
Free as in freedom.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 21:40

>>17
I guess they can get away with that shit in places like Russia, Iran, and North Korea.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 21:44

>>19
Nope. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP_address_shortage

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 21:52

>>20
It must suck to live in one of those shitty restrictive APNIC or RIPE NCC countries.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 21:53

IPv6 anyone?

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 21:54

>>21
Nope. You just have to crack Hamachi and avoid Lunix, cuz Lunix cannot into Internet.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 21:55

>>22
IPv6 routers aint free.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 21:59

If neither of you can get at a public ip address with port forwarding, then you have no choice but for the both of you to contact some other public server. It seems like it would be a common need, there are probably servers out there that provide this tunneling. Otherwise, you could layer it one top of a lot of things, like instant messengers, irc... Just make sure everything is encrypted.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 22:05

>>25
you could layer it one top of a lot of things, like instant messengers
as soon as m00t notices you abuse /prog/ as your VPN tunnel, he will ban the shit out of you.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 22:12

>>26

how do you like prog so far?

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 22:15

If neither of you can get at a public ip address with port forwarding, then you have no choice but for the both of you to contact some other public server. It seems like it would be a common need, there are probably servers out there that provide this tunneling.
tor hidden services do exactly this.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-11 1:42

[notice] Have tried resolving or connecting to address '[scrubbed]' at 3 different places. Giving up.
FUCK!

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-11 2:52

IPv6+DNS

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-11 3:00

I never imagined not being able to foward ports at my leisure. Are you fucking serious >>1? You must have the worst ISPs in the world. The shit ones near where I live set up IPs that are either static or have long-ass leases (mine's been unchanged for 2 years) and allow us to use any port as we please without any issues.

Enjoy your home in 'murrrka|Iran|North Korea|Russia|China

Name: >>1,29 2012-09-11 3:09

Never mind, I fixed it. It's pretty cool to be able to access any of my machines regardless of how draconian the NAT they're connected to is.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-11 3:45

Nat my dubs

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-11 6:03

iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -p tcp --dport >>33 -j REDIRECT --to-port >>22

remote administration

1 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 13:35

2 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 14:31

3 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 15:58

4 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 16:03

5 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 17:01

6 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 19:00

7 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 20:12

8 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 20:27

9 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 20:36

10 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 20:48

11 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 20:58

12 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 21:17

13 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 21:17

14 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 21:22

15 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 21:25

16 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 21:27

17 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 21:29

18 Name: rms 2012-09-10 21:35

19 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 21:40

20 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 21:44

21 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 21:52

22 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 21:53

23 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 21:54

24 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 21:55

25 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 21:59

26 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 22:05

27 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 22:12

28 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 22:15

29 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-11 1:42

30 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-11 2:52

31 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-11 3:00

32 Name: >>1,29 2012-09-11 3:09

33 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-11 3:45

34 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-11 6:03

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 13:35

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 14:31

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 15:58

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 16:03

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 17:01

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 19:00

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 20:12

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 20:27

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 20:36

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 20:48

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 20:58

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 21:17

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 21:17

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 21:22

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 21:25

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 21:27

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 21:29

Name: rms 2012-09-10 21:35

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 21:40

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 21:44

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 21:52

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 21:53

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 21:54

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 21:55

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 21:59

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 22:05

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 22:12

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 22:15

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-11 1:42

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-11 2:52

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-11 3:00

Name: >>1,29 2012-09-11 3:09

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-11 3:45

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-11 6:03