/prog/ - I'll bet

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-09 10:41

That /prog/ is anal enough about programming languages to devise a successor to C that isn't a piece of shit like C++.

inb4 lisp

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-09 10:49

Lisp is the predecessor, successor, and replacement of C.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-09 10:51

Does it actually need a successor? I'm pretty happy with C99, and I don't get things they added in C11.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-09 11:26

>>1

C with a macro system powerful enough to implement C++, but not implement C++ because C++ is crap. Then leave it to popular libraries to provide domain specific language extensions.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-09 11:26

The D Programming Language

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-09 11:31

>>3
C11 threading looks promising.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-09 11:39

WHAT CAN * DO THAT LISP CAN'T???

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-09 12:16

>>7
lisp cannot change the use of () for []

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-09 12:31

>>8

(set-macro-character #\[

                           #'(lambda (stream char)

                               (declare (ignore char))

                               (read-delimited-list #\] stream t)))

(set-macro-character #\]

                     #'(lambda (stream char)

                         (declare (ignore stream char))

                         (error "NullPointerException"))

                     nil)

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-09 13:21

>>9
Lispers can't use [x y z] as (list x y z) despite the fact that list is the fourth most common symbol.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-09 13:57

Go.

huehuehue

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-09 14:15

I would fucking kill for a compiled oop language that isn't c++

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-09 14:16

Objective- C

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-09 14:26

OOP is syntax sugar filled cake for crufteating K&R acolytes who need to have their anuses compiled in order to dump their kernel in the morning

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 4:27

http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/big-picture.html
also, Lisp or Haskell.
Personal fav C

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 5:17

BitC or Limbo.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 6:32

I really wanted to to move on to D or Go but they failed us.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 12:30

Lisp
GC is shit.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-11 11:11

>>12
You're in luck, D is both compiled and OOP.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-11 16:42

>>12
You're in luck, Objective-C is both compiled and OOP.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-11 17:21

>>12
You're in luck, Lisp is both compiled and OOP.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-11 17:59

>>12
You're in luck, Python is both compiled and OOP.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-11 18:06

>>12
You're in luck, MY ANUS is both compiled and OOP.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-11 18:21

>>19
>>20
>>21
>>22
>>23
The best posts on /prog/!

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-11 19:32

>>12
You're in luck, Java is both compiled and OOP.

_--pedantic
(Bytecode yes, but compiled. You never said compiled to native machine instructions)

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-11 22:41

>>25
educate yourself please.

I'll bet

1 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-09 10:41

2 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-09 10:49

3 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-09 10:51

4 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-09 11:26

5 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-09 11:26

6 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-09 11:31

7 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-09 11:39

8 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-09 12:16

9 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-09 12:31

10 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-09 13:21

11 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-09 13:57

12 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-09 14:15

13 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-09 14:16

14 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-09 14:26

15 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 4:27

16 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 5:17

17 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 6:32

18 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 12:30

19 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-11 11:11

20 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-11 16:42

21 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-11 17:21

22 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-11 17:59

23 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-11 18:06

24 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-11 18:21

25 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-11 19:32

26 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-11 22:41

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-09 10:41

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-09 10:49

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-09 10:51

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-09 11:26

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-09 11:26

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-09 11:31

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-09 11:39

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-09 12:16

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-09 12:31

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-09 13:21

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-09 13:57

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-09 14:15

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-09 14:16

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-09 14:26

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 4:27

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 5:17

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 6:32

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 12:30

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-11 11:11

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-11 16:42

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-11 17:21

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-11 17:59

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-11 18:06

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-11 18:21

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-11 19:32

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-11 22:41