Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-

FEMINISM 4LYF

Name: FFP 2012-09-05 17:39

i find the lack of feminism discussion troubling.

WYPMP

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-05 18:03

Have you checked your CISP today?

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-05 18:57

I actually invented the anti-4th wave feminism movement and I'm surprised it caught on to the point of reaching /prog/.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-05 19:45

>>3
This might surprise you, but nobody gives a shit.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-05 20:27

>>4
you are perhaps on the wrong board/website. This is /prog

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-05 20:37

>>3
It surprises you that a misogynist meme reached a board dominated by Redditors?

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-05 20:59

SURPRISE MY ANUS

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-05 21:05

This may surprise you, but I invented male programmer privilege.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-05 21:21

>>7
Here I go~

*grabs dick*

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-05 22:05

Check my privileges ^___^

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-05 22:05

Check my dubs ^___^

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-05 23:32

I actually hate sexists who pose as feminists.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-05 23:47

>>12
This may surprise you, but I am actually a feminist posing as a sexist.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-05 23:48

>>10
Privilege escalation failed.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-06 0:13

>>13
This may surprise you, but you're actually a sexist posing as a feminazi who thinks he's a feminist posing as a realist.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-06 4:42

feminists keep trying to gain control of the patriarchy network via privilege escalation, too bad they're running hardened debian

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-06 6:30

>>12
sexists who pose as feminists
so.. feminists?

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-06 7:36

>>1
*shoves my privileges up your ass*

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-06 9:47

>>16
hardened
hehe

>>17
Generally, socialists are feminists but rarely identify as such, and the people who identify as feminists are just sexist dipshits.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-06 12:03

>>19

what def. of "feminist" are you using? some weird non-sexist one that doesn't correspond to the reality of feminists today? that's useful.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-06 12:17

What's a WYPMP?

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-06 12:24

I love to fuck my girl in dominant positions, I don't want her to work (she doesn't), and ask her for lots of sandwiches even at 2AM in the morning.

Am i a machist?

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-06 13:00

FFP is sweet as in sweet beer.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-06 13:12

>>20
I am a programmer, so I am very pedantic about definitions.  Feminism is defined as being the negation of sexism (therefore equivalent to gender-blindness).  I don't care how many sexist cretinoids decide to label themselves ``feminist'', it will never change the definition.

>>22
That doesn't mean anything.  Sexism does not concern itself with sex positions nor sandwich-making.  If she stays with you of her own free will, it's because she's okay with your ``requirements''.  But why don't you want her to work, is it just a personal preference or is it a tiny peek into your retarded worldview?

>>23
FFP is a sexist, illogical piece of shit that needs to be destroyed with fire be forced to take a formal logic class.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-06 13:24

>>24
FFP is a troll who samefags every thread he posts in and puts his name on whenever he thinks WYPMP would be a witty reply.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-06 13:45

>>25
FFP is the Lemote Faggot.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-06 13:58

>>26
Nah, I'm the Lemote faggot and also the creator of the ,,Sexist Female Programmer'' thread.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-06 14:10

>>27
Ok, sorry.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-06 14:37

>>27
You're also FFP and the samefag discussed in >>25, and the only person who posted in the ``Sexist Female Programmer'' thread.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-06 15:16

>>22
What the fuck is a machist, Senor Pedro Rodriguez?

Name: FFP 2012-09-06 15:56

sorry 'bout the trolling guys/gals.

WYPMP

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-06 17:42

FEMINISM THREAD OH YEAH HERE WE GO FIRE UP THE WARP DRIVE, JENNY, WE'RE GOING TO REALLY MAKE IT THIS TIME!

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-06 19:56

Dibs

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-06 20:14

>>31
No you're not.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-07 5:21

>>24
stop getting trolled, fucktard

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-07 11:47

>>24
Not trolling, I'd really like a source on your definition of feminism.

Name: FFP 2012-09-09 0:27

feminism is female domination

WYPMP

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-09 4:27

Feminism is the KKK, and all men are the niggers.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-09 8:43

>>36
Merriam Webster, ``feminism, n.: the theory of the political, economic, and social equality of the sexes''.  Now we need to prove that that is logically equivalent to gender-blindness.

"feminism" => "gender-blindness":  Since gender is a social construct that happens to be correlated with one's sex, and equality cannot be achieved if people are treated differently (by society) based on their sex and gender, society needs to ignore sex (and gender) when interacting with an individual.  The latter statement is the definition of gender-blindness, so we proved this part.

"gender-blindness" => "feminism":  If society disregards sex and gender when interacting with an individual, then necessarily it is treating sexes equally, which is, by the Merriam-Webster definition, feminism. ■

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-09 11:44

>>39

gender-blindness will imply gender equality, but to go the other way requires another assumptions. One can take into account the gender/sex of other individuals, but still give them the same set of political, economic, and social rights. But realistically, people will discriminate using whatever information is accessible to them, be it age, gender, race, what have you. The extra assumption needed is that if people are able to identify the sex of others, they will use it to discriminate and take away political, economic, and social rights of others. This is certainly a reasonable assumption, but one can hope that one day it wouldn't be relevant.

; tldr, gender-blindness is slightly stronger than gender equality.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-10 17:02

>>38

Every nation has its criminals. And all the criminals together form /prog/ nation. /prog/ are the nation of incorrigible criminals, awaiting execution.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List