/prog/ - Reducers

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-05 7:38

Amazing things happen in Clojure: http://clojure.com/blog/2012/05/08/reducers-a-library-and-model-for-collection-processing.html

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-05 8:18

REDUCE MY ANUS

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-05 16:59

Video: http://vimeo.com/45561411

That's some really clever work, I'm impressed.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-05 17:37

vimeo.com
back to MySpace, please.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-06 7:25

>>4
Medium is irrelevant.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-06 7:41

Cool story bro. I'll use them the next time I use Clojure.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-06 7:41

>>1 >>3
Has he heard about http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MultiLisp ? Nothing new here. Move along.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-06 7:46

>>7
Yes, it's not new. It is something of interest to Clojure users who don't know about MultiLisp.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-06 7:55

>>3
Also, the talk is sooooo booooooring. It's like listening to some Hegelian-Marxist speech.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-06 9:22

>>7-8
Parallelism in MultiLisp is achieved using futures, which are nothing like reducers.

Futures are included in clojure too, future/delay reside in the core lirbrary with an identical to MultiLisp semantics. He certainly has never heard about it.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-06 9:57

>>10
Parallelism in MultiLisp is achieved using futures, which are nothing like reducers.
how can it be, if reducers are a dumbed down version of futures? and they still fail on usual cons-pair lists, requiring some vector or tree-like structure.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-06 10:12

if it's not a parallel graph machine, it's crap.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-06 10:20

So reducers are to parallel arrays what streams are to sequential lists, right? And Rich Hickey just discovered that binary addition has associativity and commutativity?

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-06 13:57

>>10
MultiFail
GC is shit.

Reducers

1 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-05 7:38

2 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-05 8:18

3 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-05 16:59

4 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-05 17:37

5 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-06 7:25

6 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-06 7:41

7 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-06 7:41

8 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-06 7:46

9 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-06 7:55

10 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-06 9:22

11 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-06 9:57

12 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-06 10:12

13 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-06 10:20

14 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-06 13:57

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-05 7:38

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-05 8:18

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-05 16:59

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-05 17:37

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-06 7:25

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-06 7:41

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-06 7:41

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-06 7:46

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-06 7:55

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-06 9:22

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-06 9:57

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-06 10:12

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-06 10:20

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-06 13:57