Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Javascript is the best programming language

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-30 14:05

Discuss

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-30 14:11

No

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-30 14:13

10/10 would parse again

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-30 15:15

10/10 would trace JIT compile again

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-30 16:56

like it, but not best

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-30 17:59

% node -e '(function (x) { x(x); })(function (x) { x(x); })'

[eval]:1
(function (x) { x(x); })(function (x) { x(x); })
                                  ^
RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded


NEVER FORGET

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-30 18:02

eval("document.head.innerHTML+='<script src=\"http://anus.com/hax.js\"></script>")

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-30 20:23

>>6
that will cause errors in every language

you can simulate lazy eval/infinite lists with streams

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-30 21:46

>>8
you can cut meat with nylon strings

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-30 22:16

>>9
you can back to /b/, please with your anus stretched.

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-30 23:44

>>8
WRONG.

((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))

Feel the Satori

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-31 0:29

it introduced innovative concepts like closures, callbacks, prototypes, and dynamic typing

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-31 4:14

>>12
Do you mean Lisp?

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-31 7:26

>>13
No, I think he really is that dumb (or really is trolling that seriously) and thinks javashit introduced any of that.

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-31 7:33

I sincerely hope this jabbashit love on /prog/ is a grand conspiracy of the Central FrozenVoid Agency.

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-31 8:55

>>13
*U MENA

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-31 10:35

肆墆肒㊙Ň锦㔰茳ₖ霦偓ጩ恅䑹ᕖ栘杳䤡☧卐唵㡄鑷虉㔇坢ٓᕂ聘㜑餕週鈆餢契煳ㄳ䙳鉱ٳ㡑鐈ضʂ甁阈⅂㦆桁隇瑈艡⎈獗ₗ㑶鉹❘ក̠࠷析儹र䈃攠銔ⁱ瘵╣茔ȧᑓ畠㕉摅⑁鄳⥩椤琗恷萀䝔摓砢ވ鈓鍉ጹ⚔ƃ吡㝩ᡉភ䀤ᅐᦈ刖脘儷瑠❖ᚁ塠ȑ㝅阈‘ԥ阀䥰憑牐塷⤱ʂ圅⁳ቑ቉̤㙓⦉䅥ͲΆ頷椔腕偄⊒戙吵႕螈℃Ŕ砲礢䝥虔䕉䙠攘偕⦗蒓琈褸䑄酐镧☠枑㤂Թ葑眴䄒坨琠ɴ‐̹眙卢划儒蘈蔒噘㙕慖栂䐲癕蠐题啹朂ʐ兑ΐ衷ㄤ莁卥ʃ݈ं⑕銓琀鑐蝰ݓ⦉Ԓ战茒䊙呰㌠䆗螙喀䙲呶぀艕搗㞂鉒蕉杹"靸͠⅑đ䁹挒㎃ѱ⁗逈॥㘨अ璅䀵և㥙䎄̨杶甐ᘡ啂ងɶጰ錥吀ᔇ煖⍀䑨倅獤ㆈ暑艓逐᥅镗挗⊐䐰堨慁杶Ҙ႔㐕႒蒖〒鎁☙ᦂ蘡ጉ␥⠉遴㑵梆鄒ℸ靰呑㉔ᚘፉ螁ႄ褢攈䝁剕㌰8⡕䜷䍧鞀瀥

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-31 10:39

灷薒ቃ堩怵鈦ȑݰᦓ枈墇晑虒艳䍖灃醃ݓؐ銖硙逷頕鎂㕃怗餩鐃熄͠堣╱┒匈煁䤳ҕ噦͖蘨昇钕萵▓枔砄㔇䡦光衦睘㤨倴錠‵䞀㊂ᡰ慩䍆ㅱ椖蝴卐ࠅᤙ゙ႁ愶⡥呂奂蒓疐抄㉖Ԉ薙ࠃ瞁ぷ犈㝹㉈逤䝖杷䎀㊙㞕鄶蝧ȗ閂؃ᕨ礕̀閘朸兩蠆ܔ̂排瀕捸脡塇䄦吤眶恕玆A瀁ᡉ጖ȣՂ捨霱鉷つ靆挢✤〄̄Ţƅ蠐ⁱ㝂镴癸፦膐䕓㍣ݘ鑥薙艶≐焇䡣撙ᐶ㡗―顈⁤艠㎖祴ᄓ፷塒蝅錱㌀茕㕉䑴怇उពጁᘑ㝃艣㉘€眒蠐∘〵陨⅁瘶錁噅瑔ᦗ锄鄤Ȕᠡ来申ᄣ块㜲畣␴⍉犂蚇⑓抆禐傔焅嘵蝨Ą㉔吣⌴鞔頣楰ᄵ钃ᅧ㍳㢉颓蜘㐃ጒ蒕ݕ偱ᙰЩ攀‐偃祳⒔䜹鞆蜓頰東䡦䀢䜹瞖蔉鐨天㔩靐ᔀအ陀㆘朆陒ሆㅢ㤠ᔣՓ蜲#Ă↉С嘶瞐䑵⁥ᕶ聁ऒㄦ儃瘴䦘倁楴瀠┨䝅咄襐桉ᄡ钖肒ᦓ肖ፇ䐩䂓♘㄂恘⎓鐱斗䀣㥧鄷偠蔆

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-31 10:51

憔ㄠ蠧ᐨ㑶ቕ坹➃餕ᐵĐ霂〈খ㞒憘畑㦅薃垒萩垉兘唣鍖故节䕒䍥؈妀钄牸蠈ᄙ莖摣煒㜃͉儣抑ᅒ㔸椔䤨䙇塨ؓ昁⑷ࡀ䕄㉓夈陖֘⑵ቂ则坥ѹ葉ᑡ搁桳䌶萂䀹⥃đʕ䀸ធ阙鞁
暗硱࢐愓げ偁茹❄醑ᥔ錈率Ƈ㔢芔⍣ᑀ䥶耤砡᥉吇㠈悅妓Ԩ䀕斈ᜦጂ鄤⌄堀䄲ᄢIJ᠘疇唣鐱䉰瞗⍷ࢇ阩挈㘗蘰馓耈脣饗椄挤倥ᙶᘣ☷㙉戤䙡⍃┘撕坅镵癨奉䒐圶✦䡅倧鍅螕㌹礐ᝈ冈̈敂☤聶㝐奣恲攷萒ᥡ醒ᐦ荠鉡倢墓Т舕Ց晴䐀桧餓朲嘖䅂䕗圡͔覐䘇’ؑᚕ艴䁢昣茤占چ耄䦉⁂္螈枇逑ᦅ܃垆愘⒂܇饉奧癣ဂ霓睙茒搔㔴ᘇ聆馐䁃ሢᤗ瑁防Ά蒖醘萖茉ݡぢ餷ᦑ㔀š摐合䜗㜡片ᄸ╈ᢘ奤襩嚁萠蔩ၱ莂䂂⍣㠩·ᔡ畳᝵㘰䌃䆘荁塖噑ㄹ䄃虠閔楷ᅄ 㑈ࡹ䊘㈘㚈阴坩㉙持頒墐砀⥑荢琲儐敒〢噂砲ᘰ㒗⌷❃ᎈ㡕靹䉘

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-01 16:12

I've talked to Brendan on Friday, and after that I have a personal public announcement: I'm decided to make some money with javascript.

>>6
Brendan regrets not having macros, but TCO is in the way on the upcoming spec.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-01 16:13

/b/randum

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-01 17:57

>>20

macros in a language with syntax is just going to fuck shit up. see perl 6. There's too much complexity in manipulating syntax, you have to start with almost nothing like lisp.

I guess it makes sense for creating libraries, but if I ever have to work with application code that is filled with DSL ruby bullshit, i will kill myself.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-01 18:04

>>22
js is the future of programming, what the FUCK do you have against it innovating the cs landscape?

ps. nice dubs

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-01 18:49

>>23
The number of problems I would have with js's use in the cs landscape is roughly proportional to the number of flaws in the language and exactly equal to sum yielded when one ranges over all current applications of javascript and collects the number of reasons why javascript is unsuitable for the said application.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-01 19:10

>>23
BECAUSE it isn't FUCKING LISP

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-02 1:07

I used to not get laid ever but now when I show girls a webpage I made using a little bit of CSS and jQuery I just swim in pussy. enjoy your virginity.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-02 2:44

>>26
If it's big enough for your fat ass to swim in, that pussy is nothing to brag about.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-02 2:59

>>24

everything will be rewritten in javascript in the future. it is only a matter of time. better get used to it. you probably just don't understand functional programming. you are probably just another java OOP drone who doesn't know anything about computers science.

first they said js couldn't support rich application (gmail, gmaps, asana, 280north, documentcloud)
then they said it couldn't be fast(2x as slow as java, 1/2 as much memory and code)
then they said it couldn't have threads or couldn't run on GPUs (webgl, webworkers, canvas)

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-02 3:12

>>28

2x slower than java
lol

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-02 4:06

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-02 5:46

>>28
gmail
the js version of gmail is absolute bloated, convoluted, annoying shit
i have all my accounts switched to the html-only layout for faster and fuller functionality
gmaps
again, slow and shitty as balls, google earth ran circles around it, every other mapping service STILL outperforms gmaps
asana, 280north, documentcloud
shit nobody has heard of, cares about, or uses

2x as slow as java
the only remotely true thing in your post, java is slow as shit, and javashit is as slow as constipation

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-02 11:01

>>28
you are probably just another java OOP drone
Says the le web developcloud XD drone.

I know, IHBT.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List