Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Infinite possibilities

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-29 18:35

The ``In Lisp" guy would cream his pants over this:

http://youtu.be/Kcyitn0LHSM?t=11m54s

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-29 19:59

Fuck off, ``finite-ist" kike.

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-30 4:22

That's how they teach infinity in universities now.

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-30 4:31

Oh no, the ``In Lisp'' guy will now start a crusade against types too.

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-30 4:48

>>4
He actually agrees with Prof. Wildberger so won't be doing that.

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-30 4:54

>>4
Lisp objects still have types, they're just dynamically typed.

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-30 5:39

>>6
Lisp is above types and sets. Lisp doesnt care.

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-30 6:23

>>7
You've obviously never implemented a Lisp then.

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-30 6:41

>>8
Minimal Lisp has single data structure - list. No need to introduce types.

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-30 9:54

>>9
With list as single data structure you will only be able to make lists of lists (´・ω・`)

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-30 10:03

(´・ω・`)

Name: Oracle Tech Support Team 2012-08-30 10:40

Everything is an Object in the Java Enterprise Platform.

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-30 12:07

>>10
A list of length x can symbolize the integer x
From there, you can implement pretty much any type.
Admittedly, that's a retarded way of doing things.

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-30 12:34

When he said "infinite sets don't exist," that was it. I closed the tab and fucked my uncle in his stoma.

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-30 14:57

aleph null
infinity plus one

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-30 15:04

>>15
Aleph is a jew letter created to fool goyim, just like the notion of infinite sets. If you have one, show me.

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-30 15:27

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-30 15:29

>>16
The set of integers.

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-30 15:53

>>18
Why is it infinite?
Sure, given an infinite amount of time, you can construct integers indefinitely, but you are not given an infinite amount of time, so it has no relation to the universe

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-30 16:21

>>19
If it's finite, then there exists an upper bound.  Find it.

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-30 16:22

>>19
What's the last integer?

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-30 16:23

>>20-21
Scary!

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-30 17:34

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-30 18:16

>>23
Who the fuck says you can't have (entropy) + 1?

Yes, I'm a kike.

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-30 19:17

>>22
Fuck off with you emphasized exclamation marks.

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-30 23:49

>>25
Fuck you, faggot!

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-31 0:38

>>24
Actually, the number you would want would be 2entropy. As for who says you can't... Go ahead and try to come up with a way to store integers that big exactly.

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-31 10:46

䠱㊆薘扡∹㘹敱ŗ☲⒂ݘ䜓␵ا㖓ᑸ酦䕇塹吢ړ✧刀䎂㔷Ԡ慱怇ܦ虠硃Ԁ螑衤吸╰銐昔┄畷⡕䅉璖褦㜗⠆)䌦晇鈲㍸蕳١c•㐥㤰☕ࠂ∴獦攠夕爱脗銘剐न牄祰憆➄䠳禓㒅坧璄眱艤桶喙夓焑覑卙ᡥ攤焦眑᎓捇ℷ饱葀倡䤄ᐈɉ戶∷ ࠐ鑦爔㈀聄ᘥ䥥ᐳ吷爤瘩⍁ᖐ奓ķ䜄咇䦔啧饦偩㌂䂈㔃鎗瀡㚑芆冇閔P蒉圇眣覐♁⥆恓䉹≒椩逆偔㔗鍅㒆䠘ဵ夒ቦ舲ŀ⍗ᆇ㍦ᖅ䉵अቈ✵脃ࡗ莙x蚀楹㘸変職敓Bΐ栁ܲ褗᎘㙱ᕶ᜔⊖҈儲܄╖ᔱ㞃墀镐ᐂ镀܆兒艱ᑢᢆᐔ祗⦖敱よ᝖ㅧᡗ⠘率ᐧ唳㎓㉔撖址撒ڔ䅸鉸憑ᙠ䆖䝒②ᒑℲ饕䐣憃蔄禁餹劑䈠鄧ঀ吩蕦靱蔄ፁ吃喓掇ᄈ啂桤杶嘃݉㘘⊖垖〃喒璔桉ᙘ٢蚑猦㥑䌄➐ᠥ̖ᤁ䠗堳蕦ᤐ道㑸ࠓ芙╂☒焘偀熈偗ᄄ吠醇᥇ք腈蚃␰ᑂᢔ唦鉶…ᚃ愣鉨፱ᤠ脂持ࡄ荄

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List