Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

whats a good VCS?

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-08 13:39

cvs shit legacy
svn shit slow
git shit over engineered

i don't wnt to try them all just tell me the answer /prog/.

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-08 13:40

no good vcs thread closed

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-08 13:43

Unison: http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~bcpierce/unison/

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-08 13:45

what about mercurial/?

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e4/Mercurial_commandd_and_their_relations.png

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-08 13:48

git+github like all the cool kids

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-08 13:48

A tool like unison, together with a very easy to use snapshot/restore tool (files + database) doesn't seem like a bad combination... you could keep daily incremental backups for prosperity if you so desire but really why bother with a vcs?

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-08 13:57

Lol at first I thought you meant synopsis vcs.

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-08 13:58

Visual SourceSafe! (The one that shipped with VB6)

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-08 14:51

hg

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-08 15:26

Atari

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-08 15:33

~~~tarballs and email attachments~~~

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-08 15:34

git shit over engineered

[citation needed]

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-08 15:37

If you don't like git, use darcs.

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-08 15:40

>>9
Hg if you are doing linux kernel size of develoment
darcs if you are doing until ffmpeg size of develoment

this is not arbitrary. hg has some plugin that on top of their normal VCS add patch based pre-revision that you can rebase them without the pain of revitions. also performance close to git.

darcs (at least 2.9.1) with their cached global repo. operation that used to be slow now aren't (example annotate) and is easy to use and understand which is a plus

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-08 16:01

mercurial
ONE WORD THE FORCED INDENTATION OF THE CODE THREAD OVER

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-08 17:05

I second the darcs recommendation. If you don't need to branch that often, it's a good choice.

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-10 19:50

Lol at first I thought you meant synopsis vcs.

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-10 20:14

subversion...good enough

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-10 21:08

Passing around tarballs is better than git alternatives

deal with it, retards

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-10 21:55

Perforce is pretty good if you have the cash... and don't mind explicit checkouts

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-10 21:59

>>20
why can't you just crack it?

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-11 2:22

>>17,18,19,20,21
back to /g/

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-11 3:03

post patches in a textboard thread.
1000 commits for a project should be enough.

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-11 3:15

>>23
And 640k is enough for anybody.

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-11 3:39

>>5
github
Hosted in the US?  No thanks.

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-11 3:52

If I'm an autistic neckbeard and I'm privately implementing Love Shack OS, is there any reason I should switch from git to hg?

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-11 7:00

For more than half of the timespan of the Linux kernel's existence it did not use any revision control whatsoever.
Now every hipster coder revision controls their fibs homework.

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-11 9:20

gitonacci hubsort

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-11 9:26

>>19
I have. I use git.

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-11 12:19

Probably Mercurial OP
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -