Hey there,
I am going to university next year and I will have to learn to program in C and I want to work in advance. I started learning it a month ago but had other stuff to do so I stopped doing it.
I had a working C-Free 5.0 and I liked it, but it got lost and now every time I try to run something in the newly installed C-Free it says 'Run program error' and I'm getting very pissed off.
Could you either help with this or recommend another good and free C compiler-environment?
Thanks.
Microsoft Visual C++ or gcc and emacs. Optionally, replace the compilers with Intel's. Anything else is garbage!
Name:
Anonymous2012-07-27 9:11
I can write a code for a calculator that can do the four basic mathematical operations. Not much more so far.
Also I tried Dev-C++ and Ch. Dev-C++ doesn't really want to work either for some reason and Ch is nothing I expected and I am too lazy right now to figure it out.
And now I am going to try your suggestion. Thanks man.
Name:
Anonymous2012-07-27 9:13
>>3 gcc
Boy you have never used anything except the default options on x86 machines have you?
>>9 >>10
You don't get it. I'll have a course of this wether I like or not.
And since I decided to grow up and get a fucking degree I will need it.
Thanks for being protectice though. Also I might start learning Assembly later to be able to program PLCs.
Name:
Anonymous2012-07-27 9:57
>>11
Then Emacs + CUA mode and gcc.
Or Kate4 and gcc if Emacs overtaxes your patience.
>>14
They will be more difficult to set up. Also, Windows implies institutionalized rape from anyone who can write spyware (which includes various governmental agencies all around the world). The source code is not available and thus cannot be audited. Lastly, the freedom to tinker is severely curtailed by both technical and legal means.
They will be more difficult to set up.
Not really. You can download Emacs and KDE Windows binaries straight from their sites.
Also, Windows implies institutionalized rape from anyone who can write spyware (which includes various governmental agencies all around the world). The source code is not available and thus cannot be audited.
I'm not a paranoid pedophile or terrorist. Thus I do not give a shit.
Lastly, the freedom to tinker is severely curtailed by both technical and legal means.
Yet your freedom to tinker with Linux's code is curtailed by not knowing how to do it (let alone being familiar with its internals). Let's be honest, have you even downloaded the code?
>>18 I'm not a paranoid pedophile or terrorist. Thus I do not give a shit. Nothing to hide argument considered harmful.
Name:
Anonymous2012-07-27 10:59
>>18 I'm not a paranoid pedophile or terrorist. Thus I do not give a shit.
George W. Bush made a similar argument when passing some laws that obviously infringed on the right to privacy. I hope you're proud of yourself. Of course, you're probably a North American under the age of thirty, so you have no idea why privacy is important. Leaving privacy vis-à-vis authorities aside, you admit that the work you create has absolutely no value since no government nor company would ever have anything to gain from looking inside your computer (because it would not be steal-worthy).
Yet your freedom to tinker with Linux's code is curtailed by not knowing how to do it (let alone being familiar with its internals). Let's be honest, have you even downloaded the code?
Yes.