LISP
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-18 17:43
Suddenly, Javascript for web-scripting is replaced with Common Lisp.
Think about it.
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-18 17:50
At least 90% of the web dev workforce would be without work.
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-18 17:57
>>1
Brenden Eich originally wanted to use Scheme but the Netscape people wanted a language that would be more familiar to Java users
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-18 19:22
Everyone would immediately add support for RLE transfers to their browsers and web servers, to speed up downloading megabytes of repeated ).
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-18 19:50
>>4
You must think your pretty damn clever, faggot.
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-18 20:02
>>5
>>4 is more clever than the idiot who just bumped a thread for no other purpose than [apoiler]to draw attention to the fact that YHBT
[/spoiler].
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-18 20:14
>>6
Nice apolier, faggot.
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-18 20:35
>>3
netscape people were wise.
Image if javascript has all it's IO done with call/cc, it would be even more a mess.
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-18 20:38
>>3
Nobody mentioned replacing mutation with continuations, dipshit.
Name:
9
2012-07-18 20:48
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-18 21:02
Chack um
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-18 21:27
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-18 21:42
I like this.
I should write a new browser and change current markup/style languages too.
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-18 21:48
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-18 22:13
PROTIP: JS is already Scheme
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-18 23:41
>>15
Where are my macros and first-class continuations? Oh, you meant ``dynamically typed with closures.'' PHP is dynamically typed with closures too.
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-18 23:56
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-19 0:13
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-19 2:30
>>16
>Where are my macros
just use your favorite touhouing complete macro preprocessor
>and first-class continuations
Back to the MIT Dungeon with you
! and take me with you
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-19 4:31
>>15
If JS was Scheme then it would be LISP and not be shit as opposed to NOT being LISP and thus being shit.
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-19 12:30
>>20
If JS was Scheme then it would be shit and not be crap as opposed to NOT being shit and thus being crap.
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-19 13:42
Dart VM is waaay better than JS. Too bad it'll never take off.
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-19 16:16
>>1
Scheme, I'd understand, but CL? Wtf.
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-19 16:56
>>23
Scheme is good in theory, not practice.
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-19 17:01
>>24
True, the lack of
defmacro and the distinction between
#f and
'() are indeed very annoying.