Along those same lines, Wikia, a for-profit community-edited site also co-founded by Wales, has found that friendlier “message walls,” instead of sparse “user talk pages,” are more popular among women.
Women online: needy attention-seekers.
I’ve never been a Wikipedia editor. The community struck me as uninviting, legalistic. But now I’m reconsidering. By Torie Bosch
I really hope you don't reconsider. Stay out if your style of writing reflects your train of thought.
To be honest, as long as somewhat important articles don't get deleted either, I don't care about some (from a male perspective) weird articles like about a dress or something.
About the ``visual editor'': I'm an advocate of Web, let's say, 0.1 -- people who need shitty tools to put content online and can't handle some technicalities shouldn't be allowed to put stuff online in the first place. What? Can't use an FTP-Tool or text editor? Well, you shouldn't be spreading your primitive thought to humanity anyways. Infact, you probably shouldn't breed, either.
Clearly there's a big problem here. Only 9% of Wikipedia editors are women.
The solution to this serious injustice of modern institutionalized sexism against women is clearly to destroy the current system such that everyone is hurt by it; just like the school system. The important thing is that men need to be hurt significantly more than women, such that we have at least 50% women editing Wikipedia. Even if the overall quality goes to shit in the process, this will be a big win for womankind! Just like the school system
>>5
As much as I agree with you, I feel I have to point out the stark contrast that reality presents to this. The inept make up almost all of web content production and breeding.
On the article’s Talk page (where editors debate changes), a female user wrote: “LOL, my thoughts exactly. Will there be an article on her shoes, too?”
Name:
Anonymous2012-07-15 13:42
>>1 Along those same lines, Wikia, a for-profit community-edited site also co-founded by Wales, has found that friendlier “message walls,” instead of sparse “user talk pages,” are more popular among women.
Friendliness is for wimps. Either shape up or fuck off.
>>12
The "Sit down and shut up!" approach to education that was adapted because it better equalized the genders. It did equalize the genders at one point, by simply hurting everyone, but boys especially. Now it's gone sour and girls are overtaking boys, which of course somehow equals more equality. Then again, bitches suck at math, so that might explain it.
There's a reason engineering universities like mine still uses copious amount of practical work and interaction. Protip: it works
>>13 "Sit down and shut up!"
As opposed to what? You're in a lecture, you sit down, shut up, listen to what the professor says and take notes. I don't see how else this can be done.
practical work and interaction
Forcing social bullshit upon expert autists? Surely you jest!