First post here

I was told that this board is exclusionary to womyn so I have come here to join your "boys club".  I notice that you say a lot of sexist things so from now on, you better watch it.  Stop assuming that a person who is a programmer can't be of other genders.

check your privilege

You forgot the part where silly boys don't hit on you.

>>1
It is not exclusionary to women; however, it is exclusionary to humourless illogical pieces of shit (if you believe in "privilege", that includes you).

goto hell;

Are you shitting me ? We are mostly talking about programming languages and anii haxing. Even womens have anus, do they ?

We don't assume programming is for only men. We  believe in two functional genders. All others are non-productive.

>>7
die cis scum

EUKARYOTES ONLY

OP- Ive generally noticed that womiyn cannot program for shit because they think it is a ``priviledge" and are waiting for their BOYS-CLUB-GET-IN-FOR-FREE-CARD. What they dont realise is that programming is hard, by hard I dont mean the cock you gobble down every day, I mean it requires work. You wouldnt know what work is, so let me explain. You know that child support check you get every month? Someone had to do work in order for you to get that money. I know you think men are obligated to just give you money, but they actually had to do boring shit for 8 hours in order to pay for a ride on your joy hole. So welcome to the BOYS CLUB, I sure hope you do enjoy all the PRIVILEDGES that you will receive for your SERVICES.

Erhm dudes, YHBT.

These threads are lame and pointless. New topic: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7cS_4T-y5P0

>>12
Another troll.

>>10
You know that child support check you get every month?
frankly, if you don't get a vasectomy, you deserved it.

>>10
I disagree, programming is alot like gobbling cocks.

>>13
How am I trolling? I'm just attempting to steer this thread away from more pseudo-feminist rubbish. Children getting stuck in claw games seems like a much better topic.

>>16
This is a shitthread. Let it rest in peace and please use the sage functionality when sending off-topic posts.

>>17
There is no need for sage when it's the only active thread.

sage is for faggots

>>18
It's not the only active thread. Back to the imageboards, please.

damn I'm writing this lisp program and the parens nesting is deeper than the nigger cock in OP's ass

>>4
That was a very poorly argued for a defender of 'logic'. (it's shit like that uneven invocation of logic which belies privilege.) See also: every Hacker News discussion involving a call out to the programming community's attitudes towards women. Suddenly, only peer reviewed journals are deemed acceptable in an argument, disregarding all the shitty, handwavy whining and life advice given by VCs or other butthurt 'hackers' and 'entrepreneurs' which was taken on face value an hour ago.

No, IHNBT. You only get to say that when you aren't that retarded in reality.

Also, bump, neckbeards.

>>22
Let me guess, logic is a social construct and therefore subjective?

I said it once and I'll say it once more; since privilege is an artificial notion (a predicate for classifying things in real life, if you may), its value (in this case, in the context of gender equality -- unless you're one of the retards who think feminism is only about women) can be brought into question.  Let's do that.

Since humans are dumb and they are liable to translate privilege into a us-vs-them situation (reason why many feminist writers seem to think the ,,privileged class'' has monopoly on privilege), and us-vs-them scenarios are an excellent basis for sexist idiocy, I posit that privilege is a shitty notion.

>>24
What femenists don't understand is that leadership, protection, provision and control are behaviours that are inherently part of men's biology. While it's not wrong for women to hold positions of power and leader over other men and women, the inherent biological makeup of women means they'll serve a different role in social dynamics. The different biological makeup leads these two classes to behave in different ways that can be described as masculine behaviours and feminine behaviours and these classes of traits are an observed part of nature.

>>25
Why are you quoting me?  Anyway, the problem with your post is that you imply that all men and all women act like that, which is false.  I am not particularly strong on leadership, protection, provision or control, and I'm sure there's plenty of examples of women who are control-freak protective leaders.  Gender equality says it's bad to tell people what they should be doing according to their gender (because that would be illogical), so your reasoning can, at best, be used to explain certain statistical trends (I'm not a psychology graduate so I can't tell if your reasoning is correct).  Note that this does not mean there aren't certain people who end up being forced doing things they don't want because of nitwits around them who enforce their gender roles upon them (e.g. if a woman is not in a leadership position, it may be because her peers consider leadership to be a masculine trait, not just because her biology prevents her from wanting that; or a man who has to get married and have kids because of the pressure from his Indian family).

My dog has no vagina.
How does he rant?
Terrible!

Stop assuming that a person/perdaughter who is a programmer can't be of other species e. g. nigger

I was told that this board is exclusionary to prokaryotes so I have come here to join your "eukaryotes club".  I notice that you say a lot of specist things so from now on, you better watch it.  Stop assuming that a living being who is a programmer can't be of other species.

lisa needs brackets

>>29
I was told that this board is exclusionary to AIs so I have come here to join your "living beings club".  I notice that you say a lot of artificial intelligentist things so from now on, you better watch it.  Stop assuming that an entity who is a programmer can't be of other animacy.

>>29
I hope the bunch of Electric Eyes that are surrounding you move closer in.

>>31
I was told that this board is exclusionary to phantasms so I have come here to join your "natural entities club".  I notice that you say a lot of narualist things so from now on, you better watch it.  Stop assuming that an entity who is a programmer can't be supernatural.

YOUKAI-FREE ZONE

>>1
SICP is for boys, HTMLDog is for girls.

I'm fucking sick of guys trying to pass off as girls irl. It's just fucking creepy, gay, and stupid.'
>wear awful makeup to try to hide manface
>long thin spindly gross bleached manhair
>typical slut bitch style way of dress which wears AWFULLY on their manbody
>coarse deep manvoice
>has penis
>insists on being considered female
>flips a shit when people rightfully call them a gay faggot
And this is invariably the case with all HRT taking ``trans'' pieces of shit and they're all such stuck up anal bitchfags who are annoying and discomforting to ever be around and also not in any way girly, you're not fooling anyone but closet gays and idiots.

But the creepiest thing is the thought of them getting into girls bathrooms and girls locker rooms and et cetera. Which is no doubt why they even do it. Sounds like the perfect route for a pedo, molest kids with enthusiastic support from every clueless libdrone within pissing distance from your fucking gigantic meat syringe, no wonder so many faggots do this shit these days.

>>36
B-B-But I am a gi~rl!

>>36
Your post gave me a boner

>>25
>What femenists don't understand is that leadership, protection, provision and control are behaviours that are inherently part of men's biology. While it's not wrong for women to hold positions of power and leader over other men and women, the inherent biological makeup of women means they'll serve a different role in social dynamics.
not in Sweden. Womyean hold the majority of power in Sweden and are trying to erase gender roles entirely
http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2012/04/hen_sweden_s_new_gender_neutral_pronoun_causes_controversy_.html

>>39
repost, I keep forgetting how the quoting works here:

What femenists don't understand is that leadership, protection, provision and control are behaviours that are inherently part of men's biology. While it's not wrong for women to hold positions of power and leader over other men and women, the inherent biological makeup of women means they'll serve a different role in social dynamics.
not in Sweden. Womyean hold the majority of power in Sweden and are trying to erase gender roles entirely