Haskell sucks

isUpper x tells if character x is uppercase. Guess how called the function that tells if number is even. If you guessed isEven, then you're wrong because haskell was written by brainless monkeys with attention span as short as their penises. Function is called even.

So my point is thank goodness Haskell doesn't allow ? to be a part of identifier or else we'd had function isNaN?

Consistency is good. Inconsistency is bad. And so is haskell.

So is this the only default of Haskell ? Then it's a hella good langage.

Though you can define a?b = a b and then use ? as identifier part, e.g. odd? 34

>>3
default
langage
Fuck off, ``François''.

lolol, call IO functions monads, so you can claim it's "pure" FP

>>4
>>4
>>4
>>4
fucking hell. it works!