/prog/ - TCC > GCC

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-03 21:12

Tiny C Compiler compiles code about 9 TIMES FASTER than GCC. It also produces executables dramatically smaller than GCC does and has C script support.

For what reason do you not use TCC?

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-03 21:22

because icc is better than both

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-03 21:22

TCC is very small. About 100 KB for the x86 TCC executable and has a memory footprint small enough to be run off of a 1.44 M floppy disk.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-03 21:31

Compilation time is negligible. Nine times faster than no time at all is still only no time at all. Executable size is a very poor proxy for output quality.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-03 21:40

>>4
Output quality is the same. TCC implements all of C89/C90

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-03 22:03

not using pre-compiled headers

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-03 22:06

>>5
You're an idiot.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-04 1:32

1. TCC does not support C11.
2. Fabrice Bellard is French.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-04 1:53

Does it compile to Sparc, ARM11 or DEC? Oh wait it's still useless.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-04 2:14

It also produces executables dramatically smaller than GCC does
I doubt it. Tell Gucci to strip the output and dynamically link the C library and tcc is probably going to be worse because its code generation is pretty dumb.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-04 3:06

>>8
Nothing supports C11.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-04 4:13

Because compile time and executable size are less important than everything GCC does better. At least on modern desktop hardware. Which is what I use.

Name: VIPPER 2012-06-04 4:39

Can TCC understand static yet?
Last time i tried it didnt.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-04 4:47

TCC is not --vroom-vroom enough.

Name: Cudder !MhMRSATORI!FBeUS42x4uM+kgp 2012-06-04 5:03

>>13
http://bellard.org/tcc/tcc-doc.html#SEC6
All of C89/90 and almost all of C99.

Of course the library is not included but that's because it's just a compiler.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-04 17:39

>>11
He's still French.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-04 23:57

>>16
you're still a fat fucking americunt

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 0:14

>>17
Still better than a fat fucked Frenchman.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 0:23

>>18
Go fuck a diseased goat.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 0:32

>>19
Why would I want to do that? Is that something that you French faggots commonly do?

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 0:36

What have we concluded about tcc?

I feel like we are getting off topic.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 0:39

>>21
How so?

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 4:06

>>22
You guys are talking about the French instead of TCC's blatant superiority over GCC.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 5:13

http://bellard.org/tcc/
[Note: I am no longer working on TCC. Check the mailing list to get up to date information.]

Why are you using a obsolete compiler that was last updated in 2009?

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 6:01

>>24
It's the "Turbo C" of developed countries.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 6:54

>>23
implying I use x86
No.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 13:32

Because it generates absoletely terrible code!

Just because something is small does not make it a good piece of software. Yes, I'm looking at you, suckless.org, plan9 and the rest of you fucking faggots. Hiding the shitness of your code behind a dumb philosophy does not make anything better.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 15:32

To all the idiots claiming that TCC's output is bad. Please give me an example of when TCC would fail me. I have had absolutely no problems with it. It consistently produces tiny files that run fast and produce the exact results I expecet.

Until you can give an example, you must concede that TCC > GCC.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 15:40

Soon Clang > TCC > * > GCC

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 16:13

>>27
add Arch Linux to that list

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 16:14

>>29
Is that some CSS selector?

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 17:15

plan9
this plan9? http://code.google.com/p/plan9front/wiki/Mascot

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 17:43

>>28
Until you can give an example, you must concede that my penis is longer than yours.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 17:57

>>32
http://man.aiju.de/1/fortune

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 18:33

>>33
nice dubs

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 18:35

hell yes dsad

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 18:38

include [ds] // dasd

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 18:39

what time is love?

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 22:23

>>34
term% theo



You probably rape children in your spare time, and here you are, yellin

g at us for violating your perceived entitlement.

term%

lol what

TCC > GCC

1 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-03 21:12

2 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-03 21:22

3 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-03 21:22

4 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-03 21:31

5 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-03 21:40

6 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-03 22:03

7 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-03 22:06

8 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-04 1:32

9 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-04 1:53

10 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-04 2:14

11 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-04 3:06

12 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-04 4:13

13 Name: VIPPER 2012-06-04 4:39

14 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-04 4:47

15 Name: Cudder !MhMRSATORI!FBeUS42x4uM+kgp 2012-06-04 5:03

16 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-04 17:39

17 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-04 23:57

18 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 0:14

19 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 0:23

20 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 0:32

21 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 0:36

22 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 0:39

23 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 4:06

24 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 5:13

25 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 6:01

26 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 6:54

27 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 13:32

28 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 15:32

29 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 15:40

30 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 16:13

31 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 16:14

32 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 17:15

33 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 17:43

34 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 17:57

35 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 18:33

36 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 18:35

37 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 18:38

38 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 18:39

39 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 22:23

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-03 21:12

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-03 21:22

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-03 21:22

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-03 21:31

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-03 21:40

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-03 22:03

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-03 22:06

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-04 1:32

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-04 1:53

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-04 2:14

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-04 3:06

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-04 4:13

Name: VIPPER 2012-06-04 4:39

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-04 4:47

Name: Cudder !MhMRSATORI!FBeUS42x4uM+kgp 2012-06-04 5:03

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-04 17:39

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-04 23:57

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 0:14

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 0:23

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 0:32

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 0:36

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 0:39

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 4:06

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 5:13

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 6:01

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 6:54

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 13:32

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 15:32

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 15:40

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 16:13

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 16:14

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 17:15

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 17:43

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 17:57

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 18:33

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 18:35

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 18:38

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 18:39

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 22:23