Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

man gc

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-03 18:12



GC(5)             Linux Enterprise Programmer's Manual          GC(5)



NAME

       GC, Garbage Collector, shit



DESCRIPTION

       GC (Garbage Collector) is shit. It is used in enterprise languages

       such as Lisp and Java. It is recommended not to use such programming

       languages and use SEPPLES instead.



BUGS

       GC is shit.



SEE ALSO

       Java(5), Lisp(5), C#(5)



Linux                             2010-05-24                    GC(5)

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-03 18:16

lmao'd my ass off

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-03 18:20

man 5 java

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-03 18:40

lel

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-03 21:08

If Java had true garbage collection, most programs would delete themselves upon execution.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-04 4:12

>>1
Back to creating shit programs, faggoSegmentation fault.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-04 10:54

>>6
Wut? My C++ programs are 100% working. No memory leaks and no segmentation faults. There are tools for ensuring that.

Go back to /faggot/

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-04 11:07

>>5
GHC had an unintentional feature kinda like that once. Under certain conditions, when presented with a syntax error, it would report the error and then promptly destroy the offending source file

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-04 15:26

>>8
That's actually kind of hilarious.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-04 15:38

>>9
Your mom is actually kind of fuckable.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-04 22:52

CHECK MY DUBS

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 0:01

>>7
Fuck off and die you cock sucking faggot.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 11:15

>>12
Fuck off and die you shit programmer faggot.

I'd rather suck cock than use GC.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 11:19

¡A mí la Guardia Civil!

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 11:48

>>13
Enjoy your segfaults, ahead of time compilation and type systems, nigger fag.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 11:50

>>15
not using reference counted smart pointers

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 13:14

>>16
Fuck off and die.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 13:29

>>16
If GC is shit, then reference counting is something like carrying your dick through a mile of broken glass to finally stick it into a barrel of salt, rip your spine off your ass and bath yourself in a fuckload of elephant dung.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 14:13

>>18
Reference counting does this within context, and at the right moment. GC does not, it saves things up until the most inconvenient moment, and then starts guessing what should be done, taking amounts of time, most of which is being spent on deciding if it is the right thing to do.

GC makes an application behave unpredictable, makes debugging in this area unreproducible, and it introduces cpu load spikes.

I believe that GC is nothing more than some experimental computer science field of research, that had some friends in high places, who were able to let it into the wild and stuff out down our throats.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 14:29

>>19
Reference counting does this within context, and at the right moment.
And recursively into an unpredictable depth.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 15:03

>>20
That something can go recursive does not mean it will go recursive. Usually there are little or no orphans. Besides you do not have to use recursion to release orphans.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 15:32

>>1
why do you post the same thing on /g/, you bandwagon fag?

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 16:14

>>22
Someone posted my shit on other board? GREAT! My second meme ever!

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 16:16

>>1
hah, i like how you listed Lisp with C# and Java

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 18:49

reference counting more like "oops i forgot to decrement the refcount *leak*" and "oops i accidentally tried decrementing the refcount of a NULL pointer *crash*"

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 19:37

>>25
If you cannot cope with these basics, then either you are not a professional, or you didn't pay attention in classes.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 19:38

_{^{^>>26

or}} _{_^{^fuck}} ^you, _{^_p} l ^{^{^a}} _{_{_i}} ^_n ^{^a} _^ⁿ ^d _s i ^m _{_^p} _{_l} ^_{_e}

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 19:42

>>26
you're mad

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 19:46

>>28
Not really. I could have said that reference counting is for men, and GC for boys. But I couldn't find something witty to rhyme with toys.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 19:47

_whats going ^_{_on} ^{^_in} ^{_^here?}

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 19:48

Effects of GC.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 19:50

^{^what} about _^it?

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 19:51

^{^_do} ^_you _believe in ^rats?

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 19:51

>>32
GC is causing Cloudflare to show up instead of site.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 19:52

^>>34

thats _ludicrous _{^_its} _^{^just} ^_{_the} _{_skiddies} ^_thats messing ^_with ^{_{_^dns}} _^settings

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 19:53

^{^{^or}} not

Name: Hi prog 2012-06-06 6:12

Hi prog

man gc

1 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-03 18:12

2 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-03 18:16

3 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-03 18:20

4 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-03 18:40

5 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-03 21:08

6 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-04 4:12

7 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-04 10:54

8 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-04 11:07

9 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-04 15:26

10 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-04 15:38

11 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-04 22:52

12 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 0:01

13 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 11:15

14 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 11:19

15 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 11:48

16 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 11:50

17 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 13:14

18 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 13:29

19 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 14:13

20 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 14:29

21 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 15:03

22 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 15:32

23 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 16:14

24 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 16:16

25 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 18:49

26 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 19:37

27 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 19:38

28 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 19:42

29 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 19:46

30 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 19:47

31 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 19:48

32 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 19:50

33 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 19:51

34 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 19:51

35 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 19:52

36 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 19:53

37 Name: Hi prog 2012-06-06 6:12

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-03 18:12

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-03 18:16

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-03 18:20

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-03 18:40

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-03 21:08

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-04 4:12

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-04 10:54

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-04 11:07

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-04 15:26

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-04 15:38

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-04 22:52

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 0:01

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 11:15

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 11:19

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 11:48

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 11:50

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 13:14

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 13:29

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 14:13

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 14:29

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 15:03

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 15:32

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 16:14

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 16:16

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 18:49

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 19:37

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 19:38

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 19:42

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 19:46

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 19:47

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 19:48

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 19:50

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 19:51

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 19:51

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 19:52

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-05 19:53

Name: Hi prog 2012-06-06 6:12