Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Facebook Algorithm

Name: Anonymous 2012-05-12 15:54

What was that algorithm that Mark Zuckerberg's friend gave him when creating Facebook?

It's a pretty damn simple website, what algorithm could he possibly have needed from a math major?

Name: Anonymous 2012-05-12 17:06

Well the problem lies into having only two choices,
the pics are selected randomly, so hypothetically if an ugly girl
is always in competition with some other uglier girl,
chances are she's gonna top the list.Whether a prettier girl
will rank lower.
The simpler solution is to test each contestant linear to other
but that would be O^2

Name: Anonymous 2012-05-12 17:42

>>2
so he used the fibonacci buttface sort?

Name: Anonymous 2012-05-12 18:07

Eduardo wasn't a business major, not some math genius that came up with a special alg on the spot, it was just the ELO chess rating function adapted for hotness instead of chess ability.

Name: Anonymous 2012-05-14 12:52

>>2
You can create a well-ordering of girls judged by their looks if you compare every girl to some other girl just once, which is n–1 where n is the number of girls on campus.  It is impractical because if you split the work between a number of assistants, local cycles in your ordering are likely to be created (notion of transitivity of the ``more ugly'' relation is sometimes lost between males, and even more so between females), which will force you to take a statistical approach which we will describe in our next paper.

If you cover only a small part of the n2 comparisons (of every girl to every other girl), you still get pretty accurate results, and the probability that your current ordering is the natural well-ordering approaches 1 asymptotically.

Please note that doing so and publishing results of your experiment will make it impossible for you to ever get laid unless you become a billionaire, so carefully weight what you are ready to give up for science.

Name: Anonymous 2012-05-23 23:09

So it was just largely exaggerated for the film then?

Name: Anonymous 2012-05-23 23:42

>>6

it was just >>4. But whether or not one thinks that is as cool as depicted in the movie is a matter of how into such things one is.

Name: Anonymous 2012-05-24 0:49

>>4 had it right, in the second half of his post. Its just an ELO formula.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elo_rating_system#Mathematical_details

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-7sRMoSkgfB0/TrdQUVOVBlI/AAAAAAAAAiA/CZQBHTWavrg/s1600/600full-the-social-network-screenshot.jpg

Seems legit. God damn they did so many things right in that movie. You will never see a more realistic "hacking" scene in any other movie. Ever.

Name: Anonymous 2012-05-24 1:19

>>5
Great show anon.

Name: Anonymous 2012-05-24 1:58

>>5
What a lie, I bet you're shoulder deep in collegiate twat.
IM ONTO YOU

Name: Anonymous 2012-05-24 3:26

>they watched the facebook movie
HAHAHAHA_FAGGOT.jpg

Name: Anonymous 2012-05-24 4:11

>>1
Back to the imageboards with you, faggot.

Name: Anonymous 2012-05-24 4:11

>>12
That was supposed to be directed at >>11.

Name: Anonymous 2012-05-24 4:40

>>8

yeah, and it was popular to. It was interesting to see people's reactions to it. They didn't seem to get it, probably because they didn't know the terms being thrown around, like ``emacs,'' and ``perl script.'' Some got the impression that being a nerdy programmer results in becoming a billionoir, which is a bit far from reality for most of us.

Name: Anonymous 2012-05-24 14:57

>>8

Ea = 1 + 10(Rb - Ra/400)
Eb =

Damn, that's some complicated shit.

Name: bampu pantsu 2012-05-29 4:55

bampu pantsu

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List