/prog/ is shit now

Typical /prog/ topics in 2010

multiple inheritance in C++
FTP or SOCKET server in python???   
jpeg image filter processing c

Typical /prog/ topics in 2012

SUSSMAN IS A JEW AND THIS BOOK IS JEWS
Common Lisp is shit
How do you display "hello world"

I believe you are overestimating /prog/ in 2010.

http://dis.4chan.org/list/prog/402

16041  Programmer needed.                             16    4 Feb 2011 17:47
16042  K and R                                        26    6 Dec [/b]2010[/b] 10:01
16043  HMA.py                                         84    6 Dec [/b]2010[/b] 10:01
16044  Inject sum SQL                                 13    4 Feb 2011 19:49
16045  Offshore Outsourcing                           28    6 Dec [/b]2010[/b] 10:01
16046  mothafugcing porgon                            8     6 Dec [/b]2010[/b] 10:02
16047  That evil J language that must not be named    19    6 Dec [/b]2010[/b] 10:02
16048  A NEW ERA                                      11    18 Feb 2011 14:20
16049  PHP                                            11    17 Feb 2011 19:49
16050  PIFTS.exe                                      13    6 Dec [/b]2010[/b] 10:02
16051  Have you read your taocp today?                29    6 Dec [/b]2010[/b] 10:02
16052  ?                                              9     3 Feb 2011 07:00
16053  Why ... Sucks                                  50    6 Dec [/b]2010[/b] 10:03
16054  U MENA HASKAL?                                 7     4 Feb 2011 18:44
16055  Shity toho thread                              48    26 Dec [/b]2010[/b] 21:54
16056  What makes a good programmer?                  33    22 Dec [/b]2010[/b] 05:57
16057  Webserver module for python?                   15    6 Dec [/b]2010[/b] 10:03
16058  fastest c/c++ compilers                        30    6 Dec [/b]2010[/b] 10:04
16059  Quotes                                         11    6 Dec [/b]2010[/b] 10:04
16060  I found a site which                           14    4 Feb 2011 18:04
16061  XOR bubble sort                                33    6 Dec [/b]2010[/b] 10:04
16062  Sussman made nondeterministic programming      5     18 Feb 2011 20:04
16063  Fored indentation wut?                         17    6 Dec [/b]2010[/b] 08:56
16064  GML                                            9     6 Dec [/b]2010[/b] 08:56
16065  Baby's first C                                 24    27 Dec [/b]2010[/b] 07:01
16066  Edwin font size                                11    6 Dec [/b]2010[/b] 08:56
16067  Why I Hate All Computer Programming Languages  37    6 Dec [/b]2010[/b] 08:56

>>2
Where do people get this idea that /prog/ was ever good?

NIGGER, NIGGER, AND MORE NIGGER!

>>3
/prog/ has always played to the most refined taste, this is nothing new

/prog/ is an acquired taste.

/prog/'s various minor ``Golden Ages'' have always been sparked by single people (Xarn, Christopher) or very small groups (#sicp, #bbcode).
If you want /prog/ to be better, make it better. People will follow suit at least for a while. Just don't expect shitposting to stop for it.

jaypee-tachi told me to come here. I like this place.

And sorry, eh, but would you mind giving us some funds for redesigning our beloved Hakurei Shrine?

/prog/ was always shit, but it used to be less shit and has had better content once in a while.

I blame moot. He needs to get off his ass and fix this place instead of using all the 100 Euro notes that canv.as brings in to wipe VacBob's HIV tainted cum off his face.

I blame Jews.

You forgot one word: ``THE FORCED INDENTATION OF CODE"

>>1
Common Lisp is shit though.

Sounds like you're some mental midget that wants to be an ENTERPRISE developer and work C++ the rest of his toilet scrubbing life.

Well... Sussman is a jew, isn't he.

Should we bring back the JEWS spam?

I'm really tired of LISP posts

I¨'m really tirde of META posts

Lisp is shit.

Everyone on every board seems to think that ``it was better before.'' Best indicator of newfaggotry trying to fit in.

>>19
It was better when we had programming contests and Xarn.

>>20
http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1334355678/40 is Xarn. You can tell because it's working, non-trivial code.

>>21
I should read threads less superficially. I'm quite happy to be wrong.

>>19
Quality has varied by time. It was not very good, then it was better, then it was worse, then it was very bad, then it was much better, then it was worse, then it was downright awful, then it was much better, then it average, then it was bad, then it was bad, then it was boring, then I stopped caring and only refreshed once or twice per day and only respond a few times per week or less.

What is clear though is that the ``quality'' right now is not at its peak and /prog/ has had much better times. I can't remember any actual era which wasn't plagued by some problems, but I do remember weeks when the quality was actually overall quite high to keep enough people engaged. Today, I think a lot of us are just bored and contribute less, maybe some other day things will change.

/prog/ isn't dead, nor alive.

>>23
b4ck 2 redddit, fagg0t lol xD

>>24
I don't even post there.
I have more interesting things to do. I'll go back right to them instead of procrastinating here.

bampu pantsu